Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Made UserSignup.Spec.IdentityClaims property required #405

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 29, 2024

Conversation

sbryzak
Copy link
Contributor

@sbryzak sbryzak commented Feb 26, 2024

@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ func (r AuthConfig) AuthClientConfigRaw() string {
}

func (r AuthConfig) AuthClientPublicKeysURL() string {
return commonconfig.GetString(r.c.AuthClientPublicKeysURL, "https://sso.devsandbox.dev/auth/realms/sandbox-dev/protocol/openid-connect/certs")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it a new keycloak thing? Or specific to our dev sso configuration?
We do rely on auth/realms path in a few places which is consistent with our production sso.redhat.com.
If we have a different path in dev sso then it won't work OOTB.
See https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Acodeready-toolchain%2Fregistration-service+%22auth%2Frealms%22&type=code

Copy link
Contributor

@alexeykazakov alexeykazakov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please see my comment above regarding the "auth/realm" path.

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Feb 29, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
12.5% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 29, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alexeykazakov, mfrancisc, rajivnathan, sbryzak

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [alexeykazakov,sbryzak]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 29, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 78.14%. Comparing base (18e65b6) to head (52e2e6e).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #405   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   78.14%   78.14%           
=======================================
  Files          38       38           
  Lines        3294     3294           
=======================================
  Hits         2574     2574           
  Misses        624      624           
  Partials       96       96           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 78.14% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@sbryzak sbryzak merged commit 1265c23 into codeready-toolchain:master Feb 29, 2024
11 of 12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants