-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: [Validation] add required_if
rule
#9028
base: 4.6
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
*/ | ||
public function required_if($str = null, ?string $fieldWithValue = null, array $data = []): bool | ||
{ | ||
if ($fieldWithValue === null || $data === []) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When will data be filled up? Using your original example: ['identity_number' => 'required_if[is_internal,1]'
, $fieldWithValue is is_internal,1
.
* @param string|null $fieldWithValue that we should check if present | ||
* @param array<string, mixed> $data Complete list of field from the form | ||
*/ | ||
public function required_if($str = null, ?string $fieldWithValue = null, array $data = []): bool |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we need the nullability here for both $str and $fieldWithValue?
public function required_if($str = null, ?string $fieldWithValue = null, array $data = []): bool | ||
{ | ||
if ($fieldWithValue === null || $data === []) { | ||
throw new InvalidArgumentException('You must supply the parameters: field,expected_values, data.'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The message is not reflecting the correct arguments.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about this?
throw new InvalidArgumentException('You must supply the parameters: field,value1,value2,...');
throw new InvalidArgumentException('You must supply the parameters: field,expected_values, data.'); | ||
} | ||
|
||
// Separate fields and expected values |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please refrain from adding comments that just describes what the code is doing. They're superfluous.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK, noted. i will update later.
$expectedValues = $parts; // The remainder is the expected value | ||
|
||
if (trim($field) === '' || $expectedValues === []) { | ||
throw new InvalidArgumentException('You must supply the expected values of field: E.g. field,value1,value2,...'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It may be better to have a more descriptive exception message by saying which field needs to be supplied with the expected values.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
how about this one?
throw new InvalidArgumentException("You must supply the field value: {$field},value? or you can add multiple value like this {$field},value1,value2 and so on.");
* This field is required when any of the other required fields have their expected values present | ||
* in the data. | ||
* | ||
* Example (The special_option field is required when the normal_option,1,2 field has the given value.): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This error message is confusing:
The special_option field is required when the normal_option,1,2 field has the given value.
The other field is normal_option
, not normal_option,1,2
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought about that too, but the fields and values are combined in the {param} placeholder. How to extract fields and values from {param}? At least we can separate them and differentiate between fields and values then provide proper error messages. do you have any ideas?
Co-authored-by: kenjis <[email protected]>
Description
Supersedes #9018
Checklist: