-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
More BuildFiles cleaning #33858
More BuildFiles cleaning #33858
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33858/22885
|
A new Pull Request was created by @guitargeek (Jonas Rembser) for master. It involves the following packages: Calibration/TkAlCaRecoProducers @perrotta, @malbouis, @civanch, @yuanchao, @ahmad3213, @kmaeshima, @tlampen, @andrius-k, @kpedro88, @ErnestaP, @cmsbuild, @rekovic, @srimanob, @jfernan2, @mdhildreth, @slava77, @jpata, @pohsun, @rvenditti, @cecilecaillol, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-cd5f83/15340/summary.html Comparison SummaryThe workflows 140.53 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons Summary:
|
+1
|
+l1 |
+1 |
+Upgrade @guitargeek |
I don't know, you have to ask that the core group. There is also this discussion here about avoiding BuildFiles altogether: I agree that it would be nice to have this as part of the PR checks. |
Got the following error on "duplicate dictionaries": ./DataFormats/L1Trigger/src/classes_def.xml @guitargeek Could you confirm if this is ok? For the rest of tests, no problem is found. |
That's okay. You can see the error also in other PRs, so it's not related to the changes I propose here. See for example |
+1 |
Hi @civanch, is this PR okay for you? Thanks! |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Another quick BuildFile cleaning PR in the style of many before (for example #33445).
This PR cleans unnecessary includes from CMSSW BuildFiles that were recently added for 12_0_0_pre2.
PR validation:
CMSSW compiles.
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
No backport intended.