Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More BuildFiles cleaning #33858

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 28, 2021
Merged

More BuildFiles cleaning #33858

merged 1 commit into from
May 28, 2021

Conversation

guitargeek
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Another quick BuildFile cleaning PR in the style of many before (for example #33445).

This PR cleans unnecessary includes from CMSSW BuildFiles that were recently added for 12_0_0_pre2.

PR validation:

CMSSW compiles.

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

No backport intended.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33858/22885

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @guitargeek (Jonas Rembser) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Calibration/TkAlCaRecoProducers
L1Trigger/CSCTriggerPrimitives
L1Trigger/L1TTrackMatch
L1Trigger/Phase2L1Taus
L1Trigger/VertexFinder
RecoHGCal/TICL
RecoLocalTracker/SiStripClusterizer
RecoParticleFlow/PFClusterTools
RecoTracker/FinalTrackSelectors
SimDataFormats/Associations
SimTracker/SiStripDigitizer
Validation/HGCalValidation
Validation/RecoParticleFlow

@perrotta, @malbouis, @civanch, @yuanchao, @ahmad3213, @kmaeshima, @tlampen, @andrius-k, @kpedro88, @ErnestaP, @cmsbuild, @rekovic, @srimanob, @jfernan2, @mdhildreth, @slava77, @jpata, @pohsun, @rvenditti, @cecilecaillol, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@echabert, @felicepantaleo, @yduhm, @robervalwalsh, @Martin-Grunewald, @bsunanda, @pfs, @lgray, @threus, @mmusich, @seemasharmafnal, @mmarionncern, @sethzenz, @makortel, @JanFSchulte, @dgulhan, @valuev, @apsallid, @prolay, @dildick, @vandreev11, @pieterdavid, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere, @VinInn, @cseez, @ptcox, @tocheng, @hatakeyamak, @alesaggio, @ebrondol, @mtosi, @fabiocos, @clelange, @gbenelli, @sobhatta, @lecriste, @cbernet, @gpetruc this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-cd5f83/15340/summary.html
COMMIT: d4fef25
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-05-26-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/33858/15340/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

The workflows 140.53 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 1268 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 37
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2650486
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 3675
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 19
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2646770
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 45.703 KiB( 36 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 140.53 ): 44.531 KiB Hcal/DigiRunHarvesting
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 140.53 ): 1.172 KiB RPC/DCSInfo
  • Checked 155 log files, 37 edm output root files, 37 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

  • Technical
  • Jenkins tests pass

@cecilecaillol
Copy link
Contributor

+l1

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

+Upgrade

@guitargeek
Do we have a plan to implement a tool that will be triggered during PR test? This will reduce this fix PRs in the future.

@guitargeek
Copy link
Contributor Author

I don't know, you have to ask that the core group. There is also this discussion here about avoiding BuildFiles altogether:
cms-sw/cmsdist#5992

I agree that it would be nice to have this as part of the PR checks.

@yuanchao
Copy link
Contributor

Got the following error on "duplicate dictionaries":
'''Searching for 'classes_def.xml' in '/data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-05-26-1100/src'.

./DataFormats/L1Trigger/src/classes_def.xml
Vertex : l1t::Vertex
Vertex : vector< l1t::Vertex >'''

@guitargeek Could you confirm if this is ok? For the rest of tests, no problem is found.

@guitargeek
Copy link
Contributor Author

That's okay. You can see the error also in other PRs, so it's not related to the changes I propose here. See for example
#33859

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

That's okay. You can see the error also in other PRs, so it's not related to the changes I propose here. See for example
#33859

... and a fix is already merged with #33850, it will enter the next IB

@yuanchao
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@guitargeek
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @civanch, is this PR okay for you? Thanks!

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented May 28, 2021

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented May 28, 2021

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit de34271 into cms-sw:master May 28, 2021
@guitargeek guitargeek deleted the deps_1 branch May 28, 2021 13:05
@guitargeek guitargeek restored the deps_1 branch May 28, 2021 13:05
@guitargeek guitargeek deleted the deps_1 branch May 28, 2021 13:05
@guitargeek guitargeek mentioned this pull request Jun 20, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants