Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mark some Reflection procedures as unstable #22799

Merged

Conversation

dlongnecke-cray
Copy link
Contributor

@dlongnecke-cray dlongnecke-cray commented Jul 24, 2023

Mark some Reflection procedures as unstable after module review.
One routine numFields has been deprecated in favor of a
replacement named getNumFields().

Refer to: https://github.com/Cray/chapel-private/issues/5022

The Reflection procedures marked unstable by this PR are:

  • isFieldBound
  • getFieldRef
  • canResolve
  • canResolveMethod
  • canResolveTypeMethod

While here, I adjusted the prediff for TestWarnUnstableSuppression
so that any symbols mentioned besides the special symbols used
for this test are filtered out of the output.

TESTING

  • linux64, standard

Reviewed by @vasslitvinov. Thanks!

Copy link
Member

@vasslitvinov vasslitvinov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the OP, please:

  • add a reference to an issue/comment that records the design decision(s) that this PR implements
  • list the functions that this PR is marking unstable
  • mention your change to TestWarnUnstableSuppression.prediff

@dlongnecke-cray dlongnecke-cray merged commit 2dcdd4b into chapel-lang:main Jul 28, 2023
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants