feat: update the Dockerfile with emulator dependencies

[renan061]

No description provided.

[marcelstanley]

I'm assuming it would be preferrable to have a single commit for most of the changes related to the emulator and the CI. In that case, it would be helpful it the commit contained a more thorough explanation about their purpose as the commit message does not convey much about it.

Also, in order to make the changes clearer in the diff, I'd suggest either creating a separate commit for the formatting changes or reverting them altogether. This would help a lot with reviewing Dockerfile and build/docker-bake.hcl (it's a bit hard to identify the upgrades being made to the versions)

[renan061]

I'm assuming it would be preferable to have a single commit for most of the changes related to the emulator and the CI. In that case, it would be helpful it the commit contained a more thorough explanation about their purpose as the commit message does not convey much about it.

Also, in order to make the changes clearer in the diff, I'd suggest either creating a separate commit for the formatting changes or reverting them altogether. This would help a lot with reviewing Dockerfile and build/docker-bake.hcl (it's a bit hard to identify the upgrades being made to the versions)

I've update the commit message with more information.

Separating the refactor in another commit would further delay this commit.
I think we can get together in a call for me to explain stuff.

[torives]

Let's just reinstate the linux/arm64 platform now that we know that xgenext2fs has a build for it. Other than that, it looks good to me 👌🏽

[marcelstanley]

Now that we removed the documentation related to bake targets from the Dockerfile, wouldn't it make sense to add them somewhere else, @renan061 @torives:

[marcelstanley]

Let's just reinstate the linux/arm64 platform now that we know that xgenext2fs has a build for it. Other than that, it looks good to me 👌🏽

Please close #439 when this is done, @renan061

[renan061]

Fixed linux/arm64. Now working!

Regarding the documentation for targets, I edited each stage to make sure the same text is still there.
What changes is that we are not identifying which stages are targets in the Dockerfile anymore.

Because docker-bake.hcl is very explicit about which stages are targets,
I don't think we need to document it elsewhere.