Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat(terraform): add support for TF cloudsplaining evaluated_keys #6677

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Aug 27, 2024
Merged

feat(terraform): add support for TF cloudsplaining evaluated_keys #6677

merged 11 commits into from
Aug 27, 2024

Conversation

maxamel
Copy link
Contributor

@maxamel maxamel commented Aug 22, 2024 •
edited
Loading

This PR adds support for evaluated key calculation in cloudsplaining TF, both for data and resource blocks.

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added tests that prove my feature, policy, or fix is effective and works
  • New and existing tests pass locally with my changes

@maxamel maxamel changed the title TF cloudsplaining feat(terraform): add support for TF cloudsplaining Aug 22, 2024
@maxamel maxamel changed the title feat(terraform): add support for TF cloudsplaining feat(terraform): add support for TF cloudsplaining evaluated_keys Aug 25, 2024
@maxamel maxamel marked this pull request as ready for review August 25, 2024 04:46
@maxamel maxamel merged commit 4e06148 into main Aug 27, 2024
41 checks passed
@maxamel maxamel deleted the testing_branch branch August 27, 2024 11:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@bo156 bo156 bo156 approved these changes

@itai1357 itai1357 itai1357 approved these changes

@lirshindalman lirshindalman lirshindalman approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@maxamel @bo156 @itai1357 @lirshindalman