-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
core/state: no need to prune block if the same #1332
core/state: no need to prune block if the same #1332
Conversation
0fefa12
to
282e7db
Compare
@brilliant-lx and please take a look at this one |
got it, thx |
eafdf1c
to
aaa29e7
Compare
The merge-base changed after approval.
LGTM, it checks the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
The merge-base changed after approval.
@jsvisa could you rebase your branch to latest develop? |
@jsvisa could you rebase your branch? or we may create a separate PR to include your change. |
Signed-off-by: Delweng <[email protected]>
This reverts commit 1bbd4b8. Signed-off-by: Delweng <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Delweng <[email protected]>
aaa29e7
to
d0539a4
Compare
@zzzckck sorry for the late reply, finished rebasing. |
Description
Don't need to run
prune-block
if specified reserve blocks are the same to items in ancientdb