-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[bitnami/common] Drop unused custom empty password validators #29432
Conversation
Hi! Thank you so much for the PRs! Just like the previous one, could you separate it into different PRs? Our automations work in a one PR per app basis |
Promote generic `common.secrets.passwords.manage` use Signed-off-by: Léo Colombaro <[email protected]>
9ca7b11
to
f98aa21
Compare
Signed-off-by: Bitnami Containers <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Bitnami Containers <[email protected]>
Let me know if anything additional need to be done in here 😊 @javsalgar |
Signed-off-by: Javier J. Salmerón García <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Bitnami Containers <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can confirm these common helpers aren't used anymore in the catalog, LGTM
…i#29432) Signed-off-by: Michael Faherty <[email protected]>
Description of the change
With the new password management common helper (
common.secrets.passwords.manage
), custom/dedicated empty password validators are not necessary anymore.In fact, most of them are already not used anymore.
The following helpers are dropped:
common.validations.values.cassandra.passwords
common.validations.values.cassandra.passwords
#29441common.validations.values.mongodb.passwords
common.validations.values.mysql.passwords
common.validations.values.mysql.passwords
#29442common.validations.values.postgresql.passwords
common.validations.values.redis.passwords
Please note that
common.validations.values.mariadb.passwords
has not been removed because still referenced a lot across the charts. Probably better to handle it in a separate PR.Benefits
Reduce the size and the complexity of the empty password validators, simplifying maintenance.
Also promote indirectly the use of
common.secrets.passwords.manage
, handling the validation.Possible drawbacks
Applicable issues
Additional information
Checklist
Chart.yaml
according to semver. This is not necessary when the changes only affect README.md files.