fix for correctly JSON-marshalling subscription input variables within WebSocketConnectionManager #365
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue #, if available:
#352
Note:
This PR has been moved from my own fork to this.
Original PR: #351
Description of changes:
The startSubscription method in WebSocketConnectionManager now attempts to marshal subscription variables using the generated marshaller rather than just trying to call JSONObject(map) over the subscription's valueMap. More information about the bug attached in the issue.
startSubscription now adds the 'data' JSON field with a value equal to what is returned from htttpRequestBody(subscription).
httpRequestBody is a slightly modified version of the httpRequestBody method from AppSyncOfflineMutationManager. An extension has been made on the function to handle IOException's by reverting to the old way of creating the field's value (i.e. with a JSONObject(map) over the valueMap). This defense still can throw a JSONException however that is already handled by the caller function (startSubscription)
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.