Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

release init images WITH stable tag #395

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Galaoaoa
Copy link
Contributor

Changes

Modify the Pipeline and Sync stack, 10 images will be release as the same time after merge.

e.g. latest version: 2.27.0, stable version 2.26.5, will release:
aws-for-fluent-bit:amd64-2.27.0
aws-for-fluent-bit:arm64-2.27.0
aws-for-fluent-bit:2.27.0
aws-for-fluent-bit:latest
aws-for-fluent-bit:stable

aws-for-fluent-bit:init-amd64-2.27.0
aws-for-fluent-bit:init-arm64-2.27.0
aws-for-fluent-bit:init-2.27.0
aws-for-fluent-bit:init-latest
aws-for-fluent-bit:init-stable

Important Node:
Because currently we don't have the stable version for init image. So please merge this PR after we have a stable version of Init image

@Galaoaoa Galaoaoa requested a review from a team as a code owner July 26, 2022 23:51
@zhonghui12
Copy link
Contributor

Hold this PR until init stable version is available

@@ -122,6 +122,17 @@ publish_to_docker_hub() {
if [ "$IMAGE_SHA_MATCHED" = "FALSE" ]; then
create_manifest_list ${1} "stable" ${AWS_FOR_FLUENT_BIT_STABLE_VERSION}
fi

docker pull ${1}:"$init"-stable || echo "0"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hmmm either I didn't notice this before or I no longer remember why its :"$init"-stable shouldn't it just be init-stable...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, let me recall...

I think I did this because we need to put different suffixes after "init" other than "stable".
Like here and here.

And sometimes we need to use "init stable" rather than "init-stable" like here.

Due to the different code styles and parameter passing way in this file so I chose not to hard code "init".

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @Galaoaoa for showing strong ownership and continuing to track this PR :)

I think I did this because we need to put different suffixes after "init" other than "stable".

Hmm but I don't understand why we need the "$init"... the init part never changes right? Its the bit afterwards. So I'd expect to see: init-${var}.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, we can use init instead of "$init". From the current perspective, I think we could indeed just use the init, this would be the better way :)

@@ -302,6 +327,8 @@ sync_latest_image() {
fi
create_manifest_list ${account_id}.dkr.ecr.${region}.${endpoint}/aws-for-fluent-bit "stable" ${AWS_FOR_FLUENT_BIT_STABLE_VERSION} || echo "0"

create_manifest_list_init ${account_id}.dkr.ecr.${region}.${endpoint}/aws-for-fluent-bit "init-stable" ${AWS_FOR_FLUENT_BIT_STABLE_VERSION} || echo "0"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This code has changed: #571 (comment)

@sparrc sparrc closed this Oct 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants