arch/arm64: syscall SYS_switch_context and SYS_restore_context use tcb as parm

[lipengfei28]

sys_call2(SYS_switch_context, (uintptr_t)rtcb, (uintptr_t)tcb)
sys_call1(SYS_restore_context, (uintptr_t)next)

Summary

Update this section with information on why change is necessary,
what it exactly does and how, if new feature shows up, provide
references (dependencies, similar problems and solutions), etc.

Impact

Update this section, where applicable, on how change affects users,
build process, hardware, documentation, security, compatibility, etc.

Testing

Update this section with details on how did you verify the change,
what Host was used for build (OS, CPU, compiler, ..), what Target was
used for verification (arch, board:config, ..), etc. Providing build
and runtime logs from before and after change is highly appreciated.

[nuttxpr]

[Experimental Bot, please feedback here]

No, this PR does not meet the NuttX requirements. The provided information is essentially placeholder text copied from the template. It lacks critical details about the actual changes being made. Specifically, the following sections are incomplete:

• Summary: Completely missing the why, what, and how of the change. The two lines of code provide no context.
• Impact: All impact assessments are left as placeholders. Without knowing the change, impact cannot be assessed.
• Testing: Completely missing build host, target details, and before/after testing logs. The current "testing logs" are just function calls and not actual logs.

The submitter needs to fill out these sections completely with specific details about their change before the PR can be considered. Just including the function calls sys_call2(SYS_switch_context, ...) and sys_call1(SYS_restore_context, ...) doesn't explain anything about the purpose or effect of the change.

[xiaoxiang781216]

@pussuw could you review? I can't add you to the reviewer list, do you join github Apache group?

[pussuw]

@pussuw could you review? I can't add you to the reviewer list, do you join github Apache group?

Yes, maybe there is something I forgot to do. I'll check later today.

[pussuw]

Should arch/arm64/src/common/arm64_syscall.c be updated too ?

[pussuw]

@lipengfei28 is there something missing from this patch ?

[lipengfei28]

d arch/arm64/src/common/arm64_syscall.c be updated too ?

done

[pussuw]

LGTM