-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GH-41302: [C#][Integration] Fix writing list and binary arrays with zero length offsets to IPC format #41303
Conversation
|
After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 5 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit bfc0dcb. There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉 The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 95 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them. |
…ero length offsets to IPC format (#41303) ### Rationale for this change Fixes the integration test failures caused by #41230 ### What changes are included in this PR? Only try to access the offset values if the array length is non-zero when writing list and binary arrays to IPC format. ### Are these changes tested? Yes, I've manually run the integration tests with C# and Java to verify they pass (when also including the changes from #41264), and also added new unit tests for this. ### Are there any user-facing changes? This may also be a bug that affects users but it isn't in a released version. * GitHub Issue: #41302 Authored-by: Adam Reeve <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Curt Hagenlocher <[email protected]>
…with zero length offsets to IPC format (apache#41303) ### Rationale for this change Fixes the integration test failures caused by apache#41230 ### What changes are included in this PR? Only try to access the offset values if the array length is non-zero when writing list and binary arrays to IPC format. ### Are these changes tested? Yes, I've manually run the integration tests with C# and Java to verify they pass (when also including the changes from apache#41264), and also added new unit tests for this. ### Are there any user-facing changes? This may also be a bug that affects users but it isn't in a released version. * GitHub Issue: apache#41302 Authored-by: Adam Reeve <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Curt Hagenlocher <[email protected]>
…with zero length offsets to IPC format (apache#41303) ### Rationale for this change Fixes the integration test failures caused by apache#41230 ### What changes are included in this PR? Only try to access the offset values if the array length is non-zero when writing list and binary arrays to IPC format. ### Are these changes tested? Yes, I've manually run the integration tests with C# and Java to verify they pass (when also including the changes from apache#41264), and also added new unit tests for this. ### Are there any user-facing changes? This may also be a bug that affects users but it isn't in a released version. * GitHub Issue: apache#41302 Authored-by: Adam Reeve <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Curt Hagenlocher <[email protected]>
…with zero length offsets to IPC format (apache#41303) ### Rationale for this change Fixes the integration test failures caused by apache#41230 ### What changes are included in this PR? Only try to access the offset values if the array length is non-zero when writing list and binary arrays to IPC format. ### Are these changes tested? Yes, I've manually run the integration tests with C# and Java to verify they pass (when also including the changes from apache#41264), and also added new unit tests for this. ### Are there any user-facing changes? This may also be a bug that affects users but it isn't in a released version. * GitHub Issue: apache#41302 Authored-by: Adam Reeve <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Curt Hagenlocher <[email protected]>
…with zero length offsets to IPC format (apache#41303) ### Rationale for this change Fixes the integration test failures caused by apache#41230 ### What changes are included in this PR? Only try to access the offset values if the array length is non-zero when writing list and binary arrays to IPC format. ### Are these changes tested? Yes, I've manually run the integration tests with C# and Java to verify they pass (when also including the changes from apache#41264), and also added new unit tests for this. ### Are there any user-facing changes? This may also be a bug that affects users but it isn't in a released version. * GitHub Issue: apache#41302 Authored-by: Adam Reeve <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Curt Hagenlocher <[email protected]>
…with zero length offsets to IPC format (apache#41303) ### Rationale for this change Fixes the integration test failures caused by apache#41230 ### What changes are included in this PR? Only try to access the offset values if the array length is non-zero when writing list and binary arrays to IPC format. ### Are these changes tested? Yes, I've manually run the integration tests with C# and Java to verify they pass (when also including the changes from apache#41264), and also added new unit tests for this. ### Are there any user-facing changes? This may also be a bug that affects users but it isn't in a released version. * GitHub Issue: apache#41302 Authored-by: Adam Reeve <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Curt Hagenlocher <[email protected]>
Rationale for this change
Fixes the integration test failures caused by #41230
What changes are included in this PR?
Only try to access the offset values if the array length is non-zero when writing list and binary arrays to IPC format.
Are these changes tested?
Yes, I've manually run the integration tests with C# and Java to verify they pass (when also including the changes from #41264), and also added new unit tests for this.
Are there any user-facing changes?
This may also be a bug that affects users but it isn't in a released version.