fix: remove outdated codes that use 'AsyncCM' interface

[fregataa]

follow up #861 #850

_AsynCM interface has a docker query coroutine as an attribute and #861 allowed the coroutine to be closed.
#850 removed the _AsynCM interface but there is still remaining codes that try to call the method of the interface.
Let's remove it.

Checklist

• I think the code is well written
• Unit tests for the changes exist
• Documentation reflects the changes
• If you provide code modification, please add yourself to CONTRIBUTORS.txt
  • The format is <Name> <Surname>.
  • Please keep alphabetical order, the file is sorted by names.
• Add a new news fragment into the changes folder
  • name it <issue_id>.<type> for example (588.bug)
  • if you don't have an issue_id change it to the pr id after creating the pr
  • ensure type is one of the following:
    • .feature: Signifying a new feature.
    • .bugfix: Signifying a bug fix.
    • .doc: Signifying a documentation improvement.
    • .removal: Signifying a deprecation or removal of public API.
    • .misc: A ticket has been closed, but it is not of interest to users.
  • Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation, for example: "Fix issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files."

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.19%. Comparing base (7150ccc) to head (4baf4b2).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #874      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   81.14%   81.19%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          24       24              
  Lines        1421     1420       -1     
  Branches      253      253              
==========================================
  Hits         1153     1153              
+ Misses        175      174       -1     
  Partials       93       93              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[achimnol]

Let's add type annotation to the method so that it could be type-checked.

[achimnol]

I have revised the PR.