Skip to content

Null pointer dereference in `SparseTensorSliceDataset`

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Aug 11, 2021 in tensorflow/tensorflow • Updated Feb 1, 2023

Package

pip tensorflow (pip)

Affected versions

< 2.3.4
>= 2.4.0, < 2.4.3
= 2.5.0

Patched versions

2.3.4
2.4.3
2.5.1
pip tensorflow-cpu (pip)
< 2.3.4
>= 2.4.0, < 2.4.3
= 2.5.0
2.3.4
2.4.3
2.5.1
pip tensorflow-gpu (pip)
< 2.3.4
>= 2.4.0, < 2.4.3
= 2.5.0
2.3.4
2.4.3
2.5.1

Description

Impact

When a user does not supply arguments that determine a valid sparse tensor, tf.raw_ops.SparseTensorSliceDataset implementation can be made to dereference a null pointer:

import tensorflow as tf

tf.raw_ops.SparseTensorSliceDataset(
  indices=[[],[],[]],
  values=[1,2,3],
  dense_shape=[3,3])

The implementation has some argument validation but fails to consider the case when either indices or values are provided for an empty sparse tensor when the other is not.

If indices is empty (as in the example above), then code that performs validation (i.e., checking that the indices are monotonically increasing) results in a null pointer dereference:

    for (int64_t i = 0; i < indices->dim_size(0); ++i) {
      int64_t next_batch_index = indices->matrix<int64>()(i, 0);
      ...
    }

If indices as provided by the user is empty, then indices in the C++ code above is backed by an empty std::vector, hence calling indices->dim_size(0) results in null pointer dereferencing (same as calling std::vector::at() on an empty vector).

Patches

We have patched the issue in GitHub commit 02cc160e29d20631de3859c6653184e3f876b9d7.

The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.6.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.5.1, TensorFlow 2.4.3, and TensorFlow 2.3.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.

For more information

Please consult our security guide for more information regarding the security model and how to contact us with issues and questions.

Attribution

This vulnerability has been reported by members of the Aivul Team from Qihoo 360.

References

@mihaimaruseac mihaimaruseac published to tensorflow/tensorflow Aug 11, 2021
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Aug 12, 2021
Reviewed Aug 23, 2021
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Aug 25, 2021
Last updated Feb 1, 2023

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

EPSS score

0.044%
(13th percentile)

Weaknesses

CVE ID

CVE-2021-37647

GHSA ID

GHSA-c5x2-p679-95wc

Source code

No known source code
Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.