-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 136
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allowing xml-internal question type. #383
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@ | ||
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*- | ||
""" | ||
Test for the xml-internal question | ||
""" | ||
from pyxform.tests_v1.pyxform_test_case import PyxformTestCase | ||
|
||
|
||
class XmlInternalTest(PyxformTestCase): | ||
def should_add_instances_for_xml_interna(self): | ||
md = """ | ||
| survey | | | | | | | ||
| | type | name | label | hint |appearance | | ||
| | xml-internal | states | | | | | ||
| | xml-internal | yes_no | | | | | ||
| choices | | | | | | | ||
| | list_name | name | label | | | | ||
| | yes_no | yes | Yes | | | | ||
| | states | VA | Virginia | | | | ||
| | states | IN | India | | | | ||
| | fruits | apple | Apple | | | | ||
| | fruits | banana | Banana | | | | ||
""" | ||
survey = self.md_to_pyxform_survey(md_raw=md) | ||
survey_xml = survey._to_pretty_xml() | ||
|
||
self.assertContains(survey_xml, '<instance id="yes_no">', 1) | ||
self.assertContains(survey_xml, '<instance id="states">', 1) | ||
self.assertContains(survey_xml, '<instance id="fruits">', 1) | ||
|
||
self.assertPyxformXform( | ||
md=md, | ||
model__contains=[ | ||
'<instance id="yes_no">', | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The two assertion blocks seem redundant to me. Perhaps it's best to go with the first variant so the count can be verified. |
||
'<instance id="states">', | ||
'<instance id="fruits">', | ||
], | ||
) | ||
|
||
def should_add_single_instance_with_choice_filter(self): | ||
md = """ | ||
| survey | | | | | | | ||
| | type | name | label | choice_filter | appearance | | ||
| | xml-internal | states | | | | | ||
| | xml-internal | yes_no | | | | | ||
| | select_one states | state | The state | state!='VA' | | | ||
| choices | | | | | | | ||
| | list_name | name | label | | | | ||
| | yes_no | yes | Yes | | | | ||
| | states | VA | Virginia | | | | ||
| | states | IN | India | | | | ||
| | fruits | apple | Apple | | | | ||
| | fruits | banana | Banana | | | | ||
""" | ||
survey = self.md_to_pyxform_survey(md_raw=md) | ||
survey_xml = survey._to_pretty_xml() | ||
|
||
self.assertContains(survey_xml, '<instance id="yes_no">', 1) | ||
self.assertContains(survey_xml, '<instance id="states">', 1) | ||
self.assertContains(survey_xml, '<instance id="fruits">', 1) | ||
|
||
self.assertPyxformXform( | ||
md=md, | ||
model__contains=[ | ||
'<instance id="yes_no">', | ||
'<instance id="states">', | ||
'<instance id="fruits">', | ||
], | ||
) | ||
|
||
def should_add_single_instance_with_select(self): | ||
md = """ | ||
| survey | | | | | | | ||
| | type | name | label | hint |appearance | | ||
| | begin_group | tablelist1 | Table_Y_N | |table-list minimal | | ||
| | select_one yes_no | options1a | Q1 | first row! | | | ||
| | select_one yes_no | options1b | Q2 | | | | ||
| | end_group | | | | | | ||
| | xml-internal | states | | | | | ||
| | select_one states | state | The state | | | | ||
| | xml-internal | yes_no | | | | | ||
| choices | | | | | | | ||
| | list_name | name | label | | | | ||
| | yes_no | yes | Yes | | | | ||
| | states | VA | Virginia | | | | ||
| | states | IN | India | | | | ||
| | fruits | apple | Apple | | | | ||
| | fruits | banana | Banana | | | | ||
""" | ||
survey = self.md_to_pyxform_survey(md_raw=md) | ||
survey_xml = survey._to_pretty_xml() | ||
|
||
self.assertContains(survey_xml, '<instance id="yes_no">', 1) | ||
self.assertContains(survey_xml, '<instance id="states">', 1) | ||
self.assertContains(survey_xml, '<instance id="fruits">', 1) | ||
|
||
self.assertPyxformXform( | ||
md=md, | ||
model__contains=[ | ||
'<instance id="yes_no">', | ||
'<instance id="states">', | ||
'<instance id="fruits">', | ||
], | ||
) |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fruits
isn't used anywhere so I wouldn't expect it be generated. I think this is existing behavior so maybe we don't need to change it here?