Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IssueId #222311 feat: Writing Test Cases for LoginPage Component in ALL #104

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: all-automation
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ajinkyapandetekdi
Copy link

@ajinkyapandetekdi ajinkyapandetekdi commented Jul 2, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Implemented comprehensive unit tests for the LoginPage component, covering multiple user scenarios and interactions.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed the "Learn React" link from the App component to declutter the UI.
  • Chores

    • Updated and cleaned up dependencies in package.json.
    • Enhanced ESLint configuration to include additional rules for better code quality.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 2, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce updates to ESLint configuration, dependency adjustments in package.json, and modifications to the App component and associated tests in a React application. Specifically, react-app/jest was added to ESLint extensions, and dependencies were updated for better compatibility and functionality. The App component saw the removal of the "Learn React" link, which was reflected in the test changes. Extensive tests for the LoginPage component were also added.

Changes

File Change Summary
eslintrc.json Added "react-app/jest" to the "extends" array for ESLint configuration.
package.json Added axios-mock-adapter; updated and removed duplicate versions for various eslint-* plugins; updated prettier and husky.
src/App.js Removed the a element with the text "Learn React" from the App component.
src/App.test.js Removed tests asserting the presence of "learn react" link in the rendered App component.
src/views/LoginPage/LoginPage... Added tests for the LoginPage component, covering various scenarios like empty field alerts, successful login, and API error handling.

Sequence Diagram

The changes do not introduce new features or modifications to the control flow that warrant a sequence diagram. The main updates pertain to configuration changes, dependency updates, and adjustments to existing component tests.


Tip

Early access features: enabled

We are currently testing the following features in early access:

  • OpenAI gpt-4o model for code reviews and chat: OpenAI claims that this model is better at understanding and generating code than the previous models. We seek your feedback over the next few weeks before making it generally available.

Note:

  • You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file.
  • Please join our Discord Community to provide feedback and report issues.
  • OSS projects are currently opted into early access features by default.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c29b7ca and 28813cd.

Files selected for processing (5)
  • eslintrc.json (1 hunks)
  • package.json (4 hunks)
  • src/App.js (1 hunks)
  • src/App.test.js (1 hunks)
  • src/views/LoginPage/LoginPage.test.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • eslintrc.json
  • src/App.js
  • src/App.test.js
Additional comments not posted (14)
package.json (5)

19-19: Added axios-mock-adapter to dependencies.

This addition is appropriate for mocking axios in tests.


91-91: Added @mui/styles to devDependencies.

This is consistent with the usage of MUI components.


104-104: Updated lint-staged to version 11.0.0.

This is a good practice to keep dependencies up-to-date.


96-100: Updated ESLint, Prettier, and Husky.

Ensure that the updated versions do not introduce breaking changes.


23-25: Updated ESLint plugins.

Ensure that the updated versions are compatible with the existing codebase and configuration.

src/views/LoginPage/LoginPage.test.js (9)

1-10: Mocking window.alert.

This is a good practice to avoid actual alerts during testing.


12-15: Mocking useNavigate from react-router-dom.

This allows control over navigation behavior in tests.


18-26: Test for empty fields alert.

This test correctly verifies that an alert is shown when fields are empty.


28-61: Test for successful login navigation.

This test correctly mocks the API call, fills the form, and verifies navigation and localStorage updates.


63-72: Test for displaying entered username.

This test correctly verifies that the entered username is displayed.


74-83: Test for displaying entered password.

This test correctly verifies that the entered password is displayed.


85-111: Test for API error alert.

This test correctly mocks an API error and verifies that an alert is shown.


113-143: Test for setting localStorage on form submission.

This test correctly verifies that localStorage is updated on form submission.


145-154: Test for rendering form fields.

This test correctly verifies that the form fields are rendered.

eslintrc.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -90,30 +84,31 @@
]
},
"devDependencies": {
"eslint": "^7.32.0",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why this is removed from dev dependencies?

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 28813cd and e729a19.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/views/LoginPage/LoginPage.test.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/views/LoginPage/LoginPage.test.js

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e729a19 and 3fa4325.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/views/LoginPage/LoginPage.test.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/views/LoginPage/LoginPage.test.js

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants