Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

perf: testing the newer nonlinear solve versions #1077

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 5, 2024

Conversation

avik-pal
Copy link
Member

@avik-pal avik-pal commented Oct 2, 2024

mostly to check SciML/NonlinearSolve.jl#468

I am nearly certain I need to make other changes to get this to work but lets see

@avik-pal
Copy link
Member Author

avik-pal commented Oct 2, 2024

there was probably a merge with the signature not updated. @thazhemadam can you update it on master?

@thazhemadam
Copy link
Member

Done in #1078.

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

@avik-pal it looks like it worked? Let me know if this should revert, but it looks fine to me.

@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas merged commit 2d06f1d into master Oct 5, 2024
2 checks passed
@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas deleted the ap/up_nlsolve branch October 5, 2024 16:34
@avik-pal
Copy link
Member Author

avik-pal commented Oct 5, 2024

This is using a commit which won't exist now. Let's revert for now. I want to refresh the benchmarks next week with DI's sparsity stuff

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants