Updated documentation based on the new version

README.md

@@ -15,8 +15,9 @@ land category areas and changes, and map accuracy assessment.
 
 To ensure a good accuracy assessment AcATaMa provides three components: **sampling design**, used to select the
 reference sample; the **response design**, which allows the evaluation protocol, and finally, the **analysis** 
-procedures with different estimators. AcATaMa has been manually tested with multiple real examples for all user 
-cases in order to guarantee the quality of the results.
+procedures with different estimators. 
+
+<img src="docs/img/process_overview.png" height="400px" style="margin: auto;display: block;">
 
 > Read more in the documentation here: [https://smbyc.github.io/AcATaMa](https://smbyc.github.io/AcATaMa)
 
@@ -26,6 +27,11 @@ Source code, issue tracker, QA and ideas:[https://github.com/SMByC/AcATaMa](http
 The home plugin in
 plugins.qgis.org: [https://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/AcATaMa/](https://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/AcATaMa/)
 
+
+## Quality Assurance
+
+AcATaMa has been manually tested with multiple real examples for all user cases in order to guarantee the quality of the results.
+
 ## About us
 
 AcATaMa was developing, designed and implemented by the Group of Forest and Carbon Monitoring System (SMByC), operated

docs/response-design.md

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ sites (Olofsson, et al., 2014). Conceptually it is useful to separate the respon
 **A)** The evaluation protocol with the procedures used to gather information that contributes to the determination of
 the reference classification.
 
-<img src="img/response_design_part_A.webp" width="75%" style="margin: auto;display: block;">
+<img src="img/response_design_part_A.webp" width="85%" style="margin: auto;display: block;">
 
 ### Sampling unit
 
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ evaluator must select the reference classes as a labeling buttons using the “L
 The labeling protocol assigns a label from the reference classification (through labeling buttons) to the sampling unit,
 supported by the reference data and the evaluation protocol.
 
-<img src="img/response_design_evaluation.webp" width="75%" style="margin: auto;display: block;">
+<img src="img/response_design_evaluation.webp" width="85%" style="margin: auto;display: block;">
 
 ### Evaluation protocol
 

docs/thematic-map.md

@@ -4,13 +4,13 @@ layout: default
 
 # Thematic Map
 
-<img src="img/thematic_map.png" width="80%" style="margin: auto;display: block;">
-
 The thematic map is the raster layer that you want to quantify the quality of the data through the accuracy assessment 
 protocol. It must be a layer with categorical values **with byte or integer as data type** with a specific pixel-value/color 
 associated, otherwise AcATaMa will prompt the user to apply an automatic pixel-value/color, but this is temporal 
 (unless you save it, see below).
 
+<img src="img/thematic_map.png" width="80%" style="margin: auto;display: block;">
+
 There are two types of pixel-value/color associated accepted in AcATaMa (based on Qgis): *"Simgleband pseudocolor"* and 
 *"Paletted/Unique values"* (recommended). If the layer don't have the color table as a metadata inside the file, we 
 recommend set and save the pixel-value/color associated for the Thematic Map before work with it, you can save that