Update maximal-computing.md

content/toolkit/maximal-computing.md

@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ See also the open source [Cloud Carbon Footprint](https://www.cloudcarbonfootpri
 {{< hint warning >}}
 It's a good rule of thumb to switch to the most environmentally sustainable data centres you can. Of course, this is a complicated issue: as with any finite resource, when you use this clean energy, you may be preventing someone else from using it. The standard, upbeat answer is that switching to green data centres stimulates demand for more green data centres and more green energy to power and cool them. Yet the relationship between demand for green cloud services and global GHG emissions is far from straightforward. Green data centres don't pop up overnight in response to extra demand. Then there is the fact that the actual carbon intensity of a given datacentre can vary significantly based on time of day and the season of the year. Jevons' paradox might also be applicable: when technological progress increases the efficiency with which a resource is used, the rate of consumption of that resource sometimes increases, rather than decreasing. More broadly, degrowth and postgrowth may prove useful analytic lenses. On balance though, it's generally worth doing!
 
-{{< /hint warning >}}
+{{< /hint >}}
 
 **3. On what balance sheet(s) will the carbon impact appear?** Will it be your own university or research institution (Scope 2), or some third party (Scope 3)? Are you happy with the way the reporting entity measures and discloses its carbon impact?