Make driver expandable to use other PortHandler #362
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: ROBOTIS-Will <[email protected]>
|
Hey @ROBOTIS-Will (or anyone else), is there any perspective on merging this PR? |
|
Are there any updates on this? I think this could be useful to anyone who wants to use other RS485 devices on the same bus. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When having other devices on the RS485 bus or for various other reasons it might be necessary to implement an own
PortHandlerclass. In order to do that without having to modify code from the Dynamixel SDK or Dynamixel workbench, but instead just inheriting and modifying it, some methods and members need to beprotectedand/orvirtual.