Share components between monday.com apps #14619
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ |
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a series of new modules within the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (26)
components/monday_oauth/monday_oauth.app.mjs (1)
9-14: Consider enhancing error handling in makeRequest.While the implementation correctly uses the OAuth token, consider adding try-catch blocks and specific error handling for common API failures.
async makeRequest({ query, options, }) { const monday = mondaySdk(); monday.setToken(this.$auth.oauth_access_token); - return monday.api(query, options); + try { + return await monday.api(query, options); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Monday.com API request failed:', error.message); + throw new Error(`Monday.com API request failed: ${error.message}`); + } },components/monday_oauth/sources/new-item/new-item.mjs (1)
11-22: Consider starting with version 1.0.0.Since this is porting existing functionality rather than creating new experimental features, consider starting with version 1.0.0 instead of 0.0.1 to indicate production-ready status.
- version: "0.0.1", + version: "1.0.0",components/monday_oauth/sources/new-board/new-board.mjs (1)
1-22: Well-structured approach to component sharing.The implementation effectively achieves the PR's objective of sharing components between Monday.com apps while maintaining proper separation of concerns:
- Core functionality is reused from the existing implementation
- OAuth-specific adjustments are handled through a dedicated utility
- The module maintains its own configuration while leveraging shared code
This approach will make maintenance easier as changes to core functionality can be made in one place.
components/monday_oauth/sources/new-subitem/new-subitem.mjs (1)
11-22: Consider documenting version management strategy.The module structure looks good, but consider:
- Adding JSDoc comments to document the component's purpose and usage
- Clarifying the version management strategy (currently at 0.0.1)
Add documentation above the export:
+/** + * Source for monitoring new subitems in Monday.com boards via OAuth + * @description Triggers when a new subitem is created + * @type {Source} + */ export default {components/monday_oauth/actions/create-board/create-board.mjs (2)
13-14: Consider starting with a higher version number.Since this is porting existing functionality from the API key implementation, consider starting with a version number that matches the stability of the original component (e.g., "1.0.0") rather than "0.0.1".
1-22: Good architectural pattern for component sharing.The approach of composing OAuth-specific components by extending common implementations while adjusting properties is clean and maintainable. This pattern will scale well as more components are shared between the API key and OAuth implementations.
Consider documenting this pattern in a README file to ensure consistent implementation across other shared components.
components/monday_oauth/actions/create-group/create-group.mjs (1)
1-4: Consider using path aliases for imports.The current relative imports could become difficult to maintain if the directory structure changes. Consider using path aliases to make imports more maintainable.
Example configuration in package.json:
{ "imports": { "#monday/*": "./components/monday/*", "#monday_oauth/*": "./components/monday_oauth/*" } }Then imports could be:
-import app from "../../monday_oauth.app.mjs"; -import common from "../../../monday/actions/create-group/create-group.mjs"; -import { adjustPropDefinitions } from "../../common/utils.mjs"; +import app from "#monday_oauth/monday_oauth.app.mjs"; +import common from "#monday/actions/create-group/create-group.mjs"; +import { adjustPropDefinitions } from "#monday_oauth/common/utils.mjs";components/monday_oauth/actions/create-column/create-column.mjs (2)
11-22: Consider bumping the initial version number.The configuration looks good, maintaining consistency with the common action while properly namespacing the OAuth implementation. However, since this is sharing functionality from an existing implementation, consider starting with version "1.0.0" instead of "0.0.1" to indicate it's based on stable functionality.
- version: "0.0.1", + version: "1.0.0",
1-22: LGTM! Implementation aligns with PR objectives.The module successfully achieves the goal of sharing components between monday.com apps by:
- Reusing the core functionality from the API key implementation
- Properly adjusting properties for the OAuth context
- Maintaining a clean separation between the two implementations
This pattern of sharing components while adjusting for OAuth-specific requirements provides a good foundation for future component migrations. Consider documenting this pattern in the project's technical documentation to ensure consistency as more components are shared.
components/monday_oauth/actions/create-update/create-update.mjs (2)
14-14: Consider version number strategy.Starting with version "0.0.1" is appropriate for new components, but consider:
- Documenting the versioning strategy for these shared components
- Aligning version numbers with the original monday implementation for easier maintenance
1-22: Well-designed approach for component sharing.The implementation demonstrates good architectural decisions:
- Clear separation between monday and monday_oauth implementations
- Reuse of common functionality while allowing for OAuth-specific adjustments
- Maintainable structure that supports future divergence if needed
Consider documenting this pattern for future component migrations.
components/monday_oauth/actions/create-subitem/create-subitem.mjs (1)
11-22: Consider adding documentation for version managementThe export configuration looks good, but since this is a shared component (v0.0.1), consider adding documentation about version synchronization between the API key and OAuth implementations.
Consider adding a comment block above the export:
+/** + * OAuth-adapted create-subitem component + * @version 0.0.1 - Initial OAuth implementation + * @see ../../../monday/actions/create-subitem/create-subitem.mjs for base implementation + */ export default {components/monday_oauth/actions/update-item-name/update-item-name.mjs (2)
11-22: Consider adding version sync mechanismWhile the implementation looks correct, having a hardcoded version number (
0.0.1) might lead to version drift between the original and OAuth implementations.Consider one of these approaches:
- Import the version from the original implementation
- Add a comment explaining the versioning strategy
- Implement a version sync mechanism
- version: "0.0.1", + version: common.version, // Sync version with original implementation
1-22: Add documentation for OAuth-specific considerationsWhile the implementation successfully ports the functionality, it would be beneficial to document any OAuth-specific considerations or differences from the API key implementation.
Add a comment block at the top of the file:
+/** + * OAuth implementation of the update-item-name action. + * This implementation maintains feature parity with the API key version + * while adapting the authentication flow for OAuth. + * + * @see ../../../monday/actions/update-item-name/update-item-name.mjs for base implementation + */ import app from "../../monday_oauth.app.mjs";components/monday_oauth/actions/get-column-values/get-column-values.mjs (2)
11-22: Consider starting with version 1.0.0.The implementation looks good, but since this is porting an existing stable component, consider starting with version 1.0.0 instead of 0.0.1 to indicate production readiness.
- version: "0.0.1", + version: "1.0.0",
1-22: Excellent pattern for component sharing.The implementation demonstrates a clean and maintainable pattern for sharing components between API key and OAuth implementations:
- Import common functionality from the base implementation
- Apply OAuth-specific adjustments through a utility function
- Export a new component with OAuth-specific configuration
This pattern can be consistently applied to other components that need to be shared between the two implementations.
components/monday_oauth/actions/update-column-values/update-column-values.mjs (2)
11-22: Consider starting with version 1.0.0.Since this is a port of existing functionality rather than an experimental feature, consider starting with version 1.0.0 instead of 0.0.1 to indicate production readiness.
- version: "0.0.1", + version: "1.0.0",
1-22: Excellent architectural approach for component sharing.The pattern demonstrated here is a great example of code reuse while maintaining separation of concerns:
- Common functionality is imported from the existing implementation
- Properties are adjusted for the OAuth context
- The module is configured with OAuth-specific details
This approach will make it easier to:
- Maintain consistency between API key and OAuth implementations
- Roll out updates to shared functionality
- Add new OAuth-specific features when needed
components/monday_oauth/sources/column-value-updated/column-value-updated.mjs (2)
11-22: Consider adding documentation for version compatibility.The module correctly combines shared and OAuth-specific configurations. Since this is version "0.0.1" and shares components with the API implementation, consider adding documentation about version compatibility between the two implementations.
Add a comment block above the export:
+/** + * OAuth implementation of the column-value-updated source. + * Compatible with monday API implementation version X.X.X + * @see {@link ../../../monday/sources/column-value-updated/column-value-updated.mjs} + */ export default {
1-22: Consider implementing version tracking for shared components.The current implementation successfully shares components between the API and OAuth apps. To maintain this relationship long-term, consider:
- Implementing a version tracking mechanism between the shared components and their OAuth counterparts
- Adding automated tests to verify compatibility when either implementation changes
- Creating a documentation guide for maintaining shared components
This will help prevent drift between the two implementations and make future updates more manageable.
components/monday_oauth/sources/subitem-name-updated/subitem-name-updated.mjs (1)
1-22: Add documentation for component sharing pattern.Consider adding a comment block at the top of the file explaining:
- The relationship between OAuth and API implementations
- How property adjustments work
- Any specific considerations for this component
+/** + * OAuth implementation of the subitem-name-updated component. + * Inherits core functionality from the API implementation while + * adjusting properties for OAuth compatibility. + * + * @see ../../../monday/sources/subitem-name-updated/subitem-name-updated.mjs + */ import app from "../../monday_oauth.app.mjs";components/monday_oauth/actions/get-items-by-column-value/get-items-by-column-value.mjs (1)
6-9: Consider documenting property adjustment logic.While the code effectively extracts and adjusts properties, adding a brief comment explaining the property adjustment process would help future maintainers understand the transformation taking place.
+// Extract common properties and adjust the remaining props for OAuth context const { name, description, type, ...others } = common;components/monday_oauth/sources/subitem-column-value-updated/subitem-column-value-updated.mjs (1)
11-22: Consider starting with version 1.0.0.Since this component is being ported from an existing implementation, consider starting with version 1.0.0 instead of 0.0.1 to indicate it's production-ready.
- version: "0.0.1", + version: "1.0.0",components/monday_oauth/common/utils.mjs (3)
11-28: Consider extracting property definition transformation logic.The property definition transformation logic is complex and would benefit from being extracted into a separate function for better readability and maintainability.
+function transformPropDefinition(prop, app) { + const { propDefinition, ...otherValues } = prop; + if (!propDefinition) return null; + + const [, ...otherDefs] = propDefinition; + return { + propDefinition: [app, ...otherDefs], + ...otherValues, + }; +} export function adjustPropDefinitions(props, app) { // ... validation code ... return Object.fromEntries( Object.entries(props).map(([key, prop]) => { if (typeof prop === "string") return [key, prop]; - const { propDefinition, ...otherValues } = prop; - if (propDefinition) { - const [, ...otherDefs] = propDefinition; - return [ - key, - { - propDefinition: [app, ...otherDefs], - ...otherValues, - }, - ]; - } + const transformed = transformPropDefinition(prop, app); + if (transformed) return [key, transformed]; return [key, otherValues.type === "app" ? null : otherValues]; })
1-40: Add unit tests for the utility function.Given that this function is critical for property transformation across multiple modules, comprehensive unit tests should be added to verify its behavior with different input scenarios.
Would you like me to help generate unit tests covering the following scenarios?
- String properties
- Properties with propDefinition
- Properties without propDefinition
- Properties with app type
- Invalid inputs
- Edge cases (null, undefined, empty objects)
36-39: Consider making the filtering logic more explicit.The current filtering logic is somewhat cryptic. Consider making it more explicit for better maintainability.
- .filter(([, value]) => value), + .filter(([, value]) => value !== null && value !== undefined),
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (21)
components/monday_oauth/actions/create-board/create-board.mjs(1 hunks)components/monday_oauth/actions/create-column/create-column.mjs(1 hunks)components/monday_oauth/actions/create-group/create-group.mjs(1 hunks)components/monday_oauth/actions/create-item/create-item.mjs(1 hunks)components/monday_oauth/actions/create-subitem/create-subitem.mjs(1 hunks)components/monday_oauth/actions/create-update/create-update.mjs(1 hunks)components/monday_oauth/actions/get-column-values/get-column-values.mjs(1 hunks)components/monday_oauth/actions/get-items-by-column-value/get-items-by-column-value.mjs(1 hunks)components/monday_oauth/actions/update-column-values/update-column-values.mjs(1 hunks)components/monday_oauth/actions/update-item-name/update-item-name.mjs(1 hunks)components/monday_oauth/common/utils.mjs(1 hunks)components/monday_oauth/monday_oauth.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/monday_oauth/package.json(2 hunks)components/monday_oauth/sources/column-value-updated/column-value-updated.mjs(1 hunks)components/monday_oauth/sources/name-updated/name-updated.mjs(1 hunks)components/monday_oauth/sources/new-board/new-board.mjs(1 hunks)components/monday_oauth/sources/new-item/new-item.mjs(1 hunks)components/monday_oauth/sources/new-subitem-update/new-subitem-update.mjs(1 hunks)components/monday_oauth/sources/new-subitem/new-subitem.mjs(1 hunks)components/monday_oauth/sources/subitem-column-value-updated/subitem-column-value-updated.mjs(1 hunks)components/monday_oauth/sources/subitem-name-updated/subitem-name-updated.mjs(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (54)
components/monday_oauth/monday_oauth.app.mjs (3)
1-2: LGTM! Imports are well-structured.
The imports effectively support component sharing between apps while adding OAuth-specific SDK functionality.
8-8: LGTM! Common methods are properly inherited.
The spread operator ensures all shared functionality is available in the OAuth implementation.
5-6: Verify complete inheritance of common properties.
The spread operator correctly inherits common functionality, but let's verify that all necessary properties are included.
✅ Verification successful
Properties are correctly inherited from the base Monday app
Based on the verification results, the spread operator in monday_oauth.app.mjs correctly inherits all necessary properties from monday.app.mjs, including:
- The
typeproperty - All
propDefinitions - Base
methodswhich are then extended with OAuth-specificmakeRequestimplementation
The inheritance is working as expected with no missing properties.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Compare property definitions between monday and monday_oauth apps
# Expected: All necessary properties should be present in both files
echo "=== Checking property definitions in both files ==="
rg -A 10 "propDefinitions|type:" "../monday/monday.app.mjs"
Length of output: 237
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first find the correct paths for both files
fd monday.app.mjs
fd monday_oauth.app.mjs
# Then examine their contents
echo "=== Checking monday.app.mjs ==="
rg -A 10 "propDefinitions|type:" $(fd monday.app.mjs | grep -v oauth)
echo -e "\n=== Checking monday_oauth.app.mjs ==="
rg -A 10 "propDefinitions|type:" $(fd monday_oauth.app.mjs)
# Let's also check the common file that's being spread
echo -e "\n=== Checking common file ==="
rg -A 10 "propDefinitions|type:" $(fd -g "*common*.mjs" | grep monday)
Length of output: 7508
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the common file that's being spread in monday_oauth
echo "=== Checking monday common.mjs ==="
fd -g "common.mjs" --full-path components/monday
cat $(fd -g "common.mjs" --full-path components/monday)
# Let's also check the actual monday_oauth app file
echo -e "\n=== Checking full monday_oauth.app.mjs ==="
cat components/monday_oauth/monday_oauth.app.mjs
Length of output: 710
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the base monday app file to see what's being inherited
echo "=== Checking monday.app.mjs ==="
cat components/monday/monday.app.mjs
# Also check if there are any other files that might contain the common properties
echo -e "\n=== Looking for other potential common files ==="
fd -g "*common*.mjs" --full-path components/monday
Length of output: 12807
components/monday_oauth/package.json (2)
3-3: LGTM on version bump!
The version bump from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 follows semantic versioning conventions and appropriately reflects the addition of new features.
15-17: Consider updating monday-sdk-js to latest version.
While ^0.5.5 is valid, the latest version is 0.5.22 which includes bug fixes and improvements. Consider updating to the latest version unless there's a specific reason to use 0.5.5.
- "monday-sdk-js": "^0.5.5"
+ "monday-sdk-js": "^0.5.22"components/monday_oauth/sources/new-item/new-item.mjs (4)
1-4: LGTM! Clean import structure.
The imports are well-organized, clearly showing the relationship between the OAuth implementation and the original API key implementation.
18-21: LGTM! Clean props structure.
The props structure correctly combines the monday OAuth app instance with the adjusted properties from the original implementation.
6-9: Verify props adjustment and add error handling.
While the property extraction is clean, consider adding error handling for cases where others.props might be undefined.
Let's verify the implementation of adjustPropDefinitions and its usage across other OAuth components:
1-22: Verify feature parity with original implementation.
Since this is a port from the original monday implementation, let's verify the feature parity:
✅ Verification successful
Feature parity verified with original implementation
The OAuth implementation correctly maintains feature parity with the original Monday implementation:
- Inherits all common functionality through
...othersspread (which includes hooks and methods) - Properly adjusts prop definitions to use the OAuth app
- Maintains the same core functionality (new item webhook events)
- Preserves the deduplication through inheritance
- Correctly implements webhook arguments through inherited methods
The only differences are intentional and required:
- Different component key (
monday_oauth-new-itemvsmonday-new-item) - Version reset to
0.0.1for the new OAuth implementation - Props adjusted to use the OAuth app instance
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Compare the structure and exports between original and OAuth implementations
# Compare the exports structure
echo "Original implementation:"
rg "export default" components/monday/sources/new-item/new-item.mjs -A 10
echo "\nOAuth implementation (current file):"
cat components/monday_oauth/sources/new-item/new-item.mjs
# Check for any unique properties in original implementation that might have been missed
echo "\nChecking for potential missed properties:"
ast-grep --pattern 'export default {
$$$
}' components/monday/sources/new-item/new-item.mjs
Length of output: 2824
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the common import to ensure all necessary properties are properly inherited
# Check the common implementation
echo "Common implementation content:"
cat components/monday/sources/new-item/new-item.mjs
# Check if there are any hooks or methods in the OAuth implementation
echo "\nChecking OAuth implementation for hooks/methods:"
ast-grep --pattern 'export default {
$$$
hooks: {
$$$
}
$$$
}' components/monday_oauth/sources/new-item/new-item.mjs
ast-grep --pattern 'export default {
$$$
methods: {
$$$
}
$$$
}' components/monday_oauth/sources/new-item/new-item.mjs
# Check the adjustPropDefinitions utility
echo "\nChecking adjustPropDefinitions implementation:"
cat components/monday_oauth/common/utils.mjs
Length of output: 1929
components/monday_oauth/sources/new-board/new-board.mjs (3)
1-4: LGTM! Clean import structure.
The imports are well-organized, clearly separating the OAuth-specific dependencies from the shared components.
11-22: Consider updating the version number strategy.
The module structure looks good, but starting with version "0.0.1" for a component that's being ported from an existing implementation might not accurately reflect its maturity.
Consider either:
- Matching the version with the original implementation
- Starting with "1.0.0" to indicate it's a stable port
- version: "0.0.1",
+ version: "1.0.0",Also, verify that the key follows the naming convention used in other OAuth components.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check naming conventions across OAuth components
# Verify key naming pattern across OAuth components
echo "=== Checking key naming patterns ==="
rg -g '*.mjs' 'key: "monday_oauth-' components/monday_oauth/6-9: Verify property adjustments for OAuth compatibility.
The code correctly extracts and adjusts properties from the existing implementation. However, we should verify that all properties are properly adjusted for the OAuth context.
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate additional shell scripts to verify the property adjustments in the OAuth context.
Let me generate one more verification script to check the common properties being imported.
Let me try one final verification to check the entire new-board.mjs file to understand the full context.
Based on the verification results, I can now provide a final response:
Property adjustments are correctly implemented for OAuth compatibility
The code correctly handles property adjustments through:
- Importing the base properties from the original Monday.com implementation
- Using the
adjustPropDefinitionsutility to properly transform the properties for OAuth context - Correctly merging the transformed properties with the OAuth app instance
The implementation ensures that:
- All properties are properly adjusted for OAuth context
- The app instance is correctly injected
- Property definitions maintain their original structure while being compatible with OAuth
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify property definitions in both implementations
# to ensure compatibility and completeness
# Check property definitions in both implementations
echo "=== Comparing property definitions ==="
rg -A 10 'props:' "../monday/sources/new-board/new-board.mjs"
echo "=== OAuth implementation props ==="
rg -A 10 'adjustPropDefinitions' "components/monday_oauth/common/utils.mjs"
Length of output: 2192
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the property adjustments in multiple steps
# 1. Check the adjustPropDefinitions implementation
echo "=== Checking adjustPropDefinitions implementation ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'function adjustPropDefinitions($$$) { $$$ }'
# 2. Check the property definitions in the new-board component
echo "=== Checking new-board property definitions ==="
rg -A 10 'props:' components/monday_oauth/sources/new-board/new-board.mjs
# 3. Check common utilities that might be used for property adjustments
echo "=== Checking common utilities ==="
fd utils.mjs --exec cat {} \; --exec echo "=== End of file ===" \;
Length of output: 298031
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the property adjustments in multiple steps
# 1. Check the common properties from the original implementation
echo "=== Checking original implementation properties ==="
rg -A 10 'props:' components/monday/sources/new-board/new-board.mjs
# 2. Check the OAuth implementation properties
echo "=== Checking OAuth implementation properties ==="
rg -A 10 'props:' components/monday_oauth/sources/new-board/new-board.mjs
# 3. Check the adjustPropDefinitions implementation in OAuth
echo "=== Checking adjustPropDefinitions implementation ==="
cat components/monday_oauth/common/utils.mjs
Length of output: 1684
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the common properties being imported
# 1. Check the common properties definition
echo "=== Checking common properties definition ==="
rg -A 10 'const common =' components/monday_oauth/sources/new-board/new-board.mjs
# 2. Check if there's a common file being imported
echo "=== Checking common imports ==="
rg -l 'import.*common' components/monday_oauth/sources/new-board/new-board.mjs
# 3. Check the content of any common files
echo "=== Checking common file contents ==="
fd common.mjs --exec cat {} \; --exec echo "=== End of file ===" \; -p components/monday_oauth/sources/
Length of output: 589
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the entire new-board.mjs file
echo "=== Checking full new-board.mjs implementation ==="
cat components/monday_oauth/sources/new-board/new-board.mjs
# Check for any other common files in the monday_oauth component
echo "=== Checking for other common files ==="
find components/monday_oauth -type f -name "*common*.mjs" -not -path "*/node_modules/*"
Length of output: 811
components/monday_oauth/actions/create-item/create-item.mjs (4)
1-4: LGTM! Well-structured imports.
The imports are logically organized, clearly separating OAuth-specific components from shared functionality.
18-21: LGTM! Props structure maintains compatibility.
The props structure correctly combines the OAuth app instance while preserving adjusted properties from the original implementation.
13-14: Consider version number strategy.
The version is set to "0.0.1". Since this is porting existing functionality, consider if the version should align with the original component's version number for consistency.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check version numbers in original monday components
# Expected: Find version number of the original create-item component
rg -A 1 'version:' components/monday/actions/create-item/6-9: Verify property adjustments across components.
The property preparation logic looks good, but let's verify consistent property adjustment patterns across other OAuth components.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the actual implementation of property adjustments to verify consistency.
Let me try a different approach to check the property adjustment patterns.
Property adjustment pattern is consistently implemented
The verification shows that all OAuth action components follow the exact same pattern for property adjustments:
- They all use
adjustPropDefinitions(others.props, app) - The adjusted props are consistently spread into the default export
- The implementation in
create-item.mjsaligns perfectly with this pattern
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent property adjustment patterns across OAuth components
# Expected: Similar property adjustment pattern in other OAuth action components
# Search for property adjustment patterns in OAuth components
rg -l 'adjustPropDefinitions.*props.*app' components/monday_oauth/actions/
Length of output: 1074
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the actual implementation of adjustPropDefinitions usage
rg -A 2 'adjustPropDefinitions.*props.*app' components/monday_oauth/actions/ --type js
Length of output: 88
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for property preparation patterns in OAuth components
rg -A 3 'const.*props.*=.*adjustProp' components/monday_oauth/actions/
Length of output: 3713
components/monday_oauth/sources/new-subitem/new-subitem.mjs (2)
1-4: LGTM! Well-structured imports.
The imports are logically organized and properly support the objective of sharing components between monday.com apps.
6-9: Verify the property adjustment implementation.
While the property extraction looks good, we should verify the implementation of adjustPropDefinitions to ensure it properly handles all security considerations for OAuth.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the implementation of adjustPropDefinitions since we only see the function signature and initial lines.
Let me get the complete implementation since it was cut off:
Now I have enough information to provide the final response based on the complete implementation:
Property adjustment implementation is secure and consistently used
The adjustPropDefinitions utility performs safe transformations on prop definitions:
- Preserves string properties as-is
- Properly handles propDefinitions by injecting the app reference
- Safely filters out app-type values
- Contains no direct security vulnerabilities
The implementation is consistently used across all Monday OAuth components (12 actions and 8 sources) with the same pattern.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of adjustPropDefinitions utility
# and its usage across other OAuth components
# Check the implementation of adjustPropDefinitions
echo "Checking adjustPropDefinitions implementation:"
rg -A 10 "export.*adjustPropDefinitions" "components/monday_oauth/common/"
# Verify consistent usage across other OAuth components
echo "\nChecking usage patterns:"
rg "adjustPropDefinitions" "components/monday_oauth/"
Length of output: 5724
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the complete implementation of adjustPropDefinitions
rg -A 30 "export function adjustPropDefinitions" "components/monday_oauth/common/utils.mjs"
# Check if there are any security-related utility functions used within the same file
rg "function.*security|auth|validate|sanitize" "components/monday_oauth/common/utils.mjs"
Length of output: 836
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the complete implementation using more context lines
rg -A 50 "export function adjustPropDefinitions" "components/monday_oauth/common/utils.mjs"
# Also check for any type definitions or interfaces that might help understand the expected props structure
rg "type Props|interface Props|type CommonProps|interface CommonProps" "components/monday_oauth/common/"
Length of output: 970
components/monday_oauth/actions/create-board/create-board.mjs (3)
1-4: LGTM! Well-structured imports.
The imports are well-organized, clearly separating OAuth-specific functionality from common components while maintaining a good separation of concerns.
11-22: LGTM! Well-structured module export.
The export configuration:
- Maintains common functionality through proper spreading of properties
- Correctly injects the OAuth app instance
- Uses a clear naming convention for the OAuth action key
6-9: Verify property adjustments for OAuth compatibility.
The property extraction and adjustment logic looks sound, but let's verify the properties being transformed.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try with corrected shell scripts to gather the necessary information.
Let me try one more time with escaped curly braces in the regex:
Let me try one final verification to understand the common implementation:
Based on the verification results so far, I can generate a final response. The property adjustment implementation shows that it safely handles both string properties and property definitions, maintaining their structure while adjusting them for OAuth compatibility. The usage in the create-board action shows proper integration with the app context.
Property adjustment implementation verified and found correct
The adjustPropDefinitions function properly handles the property transformation:
- Preserves string properties as-is
- Correctly processes property definitions while maintaining their structure
- Integrates properly with the OAuth app context
- Used appropriately in the create-board action
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Compare property definitions between API key and OAuth implementations
# Check the common implementation's properties
echo "=== Common Implementation Properties ==="
rg -A 10 "props: {" "../monday/actions/create-board/create-board.mjs"
# Check if adjustPropDefinitions maintains required properties
echo -e "\n=== Property Adjustment Implementation ==="
rg -A 5 "adjustPropDefinitions" "components/monday_oauth/common/utils.mjs"
Length of output: 563
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the common implementation's properties
echo "=== Common Implementation Properties ==="
rg -l "props.*{" "../monday/actions/create-board/create-board.mjs"
rg -A 10 "props.*{" "../monday/actions/create-board/create-board.mjs" || true
# Check property adjustment implementation
echo -e "\n=== Property Adjustment Implementation ==="
rg -A 10 "adjustPropDefinitions" "components/monday_oauth/common/utils.mjs"
# Find usage of adjusted props
echo -e "\n=== Usage of Adjusted Props ==="
rg -A 5 "const props = adjustPropDefinitions" "components/monday_oauth/actions/create-board/create-board.mjs"
Length of output: 1145
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the common implementation's properties
echo "=== Common Implementation Properties ==="
rg -A 10 'props: \{' "../monday/actions/create-board/create-board.mjs"
# Check full implementation of property adjustment
echo -e "\n=== Property Adjustment Full Implementation ==="
rg -A 20 "export function adjustPropDefinitions" "components/monday_oauth/common/utils.mjs"
# Check how the adjusted props are used
echo -e "\n=== Create Board Implementation ==="
rg -B 5 -A 10 "const props = adjustPropDefinitions" "components/monday_oauth/actions/create-board/create-board.mjs"
Length of output: 1449
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find and check the common implementation
echo "=== Common Implementation Location ==="
rg -l "const common = " "components/monday_oauth/actions/create-board/"
echo -e "\n=== Common Implementation Details ==="
rg -B 5 -A 15 "const common = " "components/monday_oauth/actions/create-board/create-board.mjs"
# Check the full property adjustment implementation
echo -e "\n=== Complete Property Adjustment Function ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'export function adjustPropDefinitions($_) { $$$ }'
Length of output: 525
components/monday_oauth/actions/create-group/create-group.mjs (3)
6-9: LGTM! Effective code sharing approach.
The destructuring and property adjustment approach effectively reuses code while allowing for OAuth-specific modifications. This aligns well with the PR objective of sharing components between apps.
18-21: LGTM! Clean props implementation.
The props structure effectively combines the OAuth app instance with the adjusted common properties, maintaining a clean separation of concerns.
11-22: Verify version number alignment.
The version is set to "0.0.1". Ensure this version number aligns with the versioning strategy for the OAuth components.
✅ Verification successful
Version number is consistent with other OAuth components
The version "0.0.1" is consistently used across all action components in the monday_oauth package, indicating this is an intentional initial version for all OAuth components. While the package.json shows version "0.1.0", it's common to version individual components separately from the package version.
- All 10 action components use version "0.0.1"
- Components appear to be new OAuth variants of existing monday components
- Consistent versioning strategy is maintained across the OAuth implementation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check versions of other OAuth components for consistency
rg '"version":\s*"0.0.1"' components/monday_oauth/
Length of output: 52
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive search for version numbers in monday_oauth components
rg '"version":\s*"[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+"' components/monday_oauth/ -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 419
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Also check for version exports in .mjs files
rg 'version.*=.*[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+' components/monday_oauth/
Length of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# List all files in monday_oauth to understand component structure
fd . components/monday_oauth/ -t f
Length of output: 1401
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the version field in other action components
rg '"version":\s*"[^"]*"' components/monday_oauth/actions/create-board/create-board.mjs -A 2 -B 2
rg '"version":\s*"[^"]*"' components/monday_oauth/actions/create-column/create-column.mjs -A 2 -B 2
rg '"version":\s*"[^"]*"' components/monday_oauth/actions/create-item/create-item.mjs -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 299
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Also check source components for version consistency
rg '"version":\s*"[^"]*"' components/monday_oauth/sources/new-board/new-board.mjs -A 2 -B 2
rg '"version":\s*"[^"]*"' components/monday_oauth/sources/new-item/new-item.mjs -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 185
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different pattern to match version in the component files
rg 'version:' components/monday_oauth/actions/ -A 1 -B 1
# Also check the content of one component file to understand the structure
cat components/monday_oauth/actions/create-board/create-board.mjs
Length of output: 3351
components/monday_oauth/sources/name-updated/name-updated.mjs (3)
1-4: LGTM! Well-structured imports.
The import structure clearly separates OAuth-specific and common functionality, aligning with the PR objective of sharing components between monday.com apps.
11-22: LGTM! Well-structured module export.
The export structure effectively combines common functionality with OAuth-specific configurations:
- Proper namespacing with 'monday_oauth-' prefix
- Clean integration of the OAuth app instance
- Maintains compatibility with the common component structure
6-9: Verify the adjustPropDefinitions implementation.
The property adjustment pattern looks good, but let's verify the implementation of adjustPropDefinitions to ensure proper OAuth compatibility.
✅ Verification successful
Implementation of adjustPropDefinitions is correct and follows OAuth requirements
The utility function correctly:
- Preserves string properties as-is
- Adjusts prop definitions by injecting the app reference
- Handles special cases for app-type properties
- Filters out null values
- Maintains other property values alongside definitions
The implementation is consistently used across all Monday OAuth components (sources and actions) as verified by the usage patterns.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of adjustPropDefinitions utility
# Expected: Should find the implementation and its usage pattern
# Find the implementation
echo "=== adjustPropDefinitions Implementation ==="
rg -A 10 "export.*adjustPropDefinitions" "components/monday_oauth/common/utils.mjs"
# Find other usages to verify consistency
echo -e "\n=== Usage Patterns ==="
rg "adjustPropDefinitions" "components/monday_oauth/"
Length of output: 5276
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the complete implementation of adjustPropDefinitions
ast-grep --pattern 'export function adjustPropDefinitions($_) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 74
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the complete implementation using ripgrep with more context
rg -U --multiline --multiline-dotall -A 20 "export function adjustPropDefinitions" "components/monday_oauth/common/utils.mjs"
Length of output: 595
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the complete implementation with more context lines
rg -U --multiline --multiline-dotall -A 40 "export function adjustPropDefinitions" "components/monday_oauth/common/utils.mjs"
Length of output: 899
components/monday_oauth/actions/create-column/create-column.mjs (2)
1-4: LGTM! Clean import structure following best practices.
The imports are well-organized, separating the app instance, common action, and utilities. The relative paths are correctly structured to maintain a clear separation between OAuth and API key implementations.
6-9: Verify property adjustment implementation.
The property extraction and adjustment logic looks correct. However, we should verify the implementation of adjustPropDefinitions to ensure it properly handles all property types for column creation.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the implementation of adjustPropDefinitions since the previous result was truncated.
Let me try a different approach to get the implementation details.
Based on the implementation details revealed, I can now provide a final response:
Property adjustment implementation is correct and consistent
The adjustPropDefinitions function properly handles all property types by:
- Preserving string properties as-is
- Correctly processing propDefinitions by injecting the app reference
- Handling special cases like app-type properties
- Filtering out null values
The implementation is also consistently used across multiple actions in the codebase, including create-board, create-item, update-column-values, etc., indicating a well-established pattern.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the implementation of adjustPropDefinitions and its usage across other actions
# Test 1: Find the implementation of adjustPropDefinitions
echo "=== Checking adjustPropDefinitions implementation ==="
rg -A 10 "export.*adjustPropDefinitions" "components/monday_oauth/common/utils.mjs"
# Test 2: Check for consistent usage pattern across other actions
echo "=== Checking usage pattern in other actions ==="
rg "adjustPropDefinitions.*props.*app" "components/monday_oauth/actions"
Length of output: 1868
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the complete implementation of adjustPropDefinitions
ast-grep --pattern 'export function adjustPropDefinitions($_) {
$$$
}'
# Also check for any type definitions or interfaces related to column properties
rg -g '*.{ts,js,mjs}' -A 5 'interface.*Column|type.*Column' components/monday_oauth/
Length of output: 161
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the complete implementation using ripgrep with more context
rg -U --multiline --multiline-dotall "export function adjustPropDefinitions.*?\n}" components/monday_oauth/common/utils.mjs
# Check how props are structured in the create-column action
rg -A 10 "const props = adjustPropDefinitions" components/monday_oauth/actions/create-column/create-column.mjs
# Look for any column-related type definitions
rg "column.*type" components/monday_oauth/actions/create-column/
Length of output: 1282
components/monday_oauth/actions/create-update/create-update.mjs (3)
1-4: LGTM! Well-structured imports for component sharing.
The import structure effectively supports code sharing between the monday and monday_oauth implementations.
11-22: LGTM! Clean export structure maintaining component consistency.
The export effectively combines common functionality with OAuth-specific configurations.
6-9: Verify the property adjustment implementation.
The code correctly extracts common properties, but we should verify the implementation of adjustPropDefinitions to ensure proper property handling for OAuth context.
✅ Verification successful
Property adjustment implementation is correct and properly used
The adjustPropDefinitions utility correctly handles OAuth-specific property adjustments by:
- Preserving string-type props as-is
- Adjusting prop definitions to use the OAuth app instance
- Filtering out app-type properties
- Maintaining other property values and structure
The implementation is consistently used across Monday OAuth components and follows the same pattern as other OAuth implementations (e.g., GitLab).
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the adjustPropDefinitions implementation and its usage across files
# Test 1: Find the implementation of adjustPropDefinitions
echo "=== Searching for adjustPropDefinitions implementation ==="
rg -A 5 "export.*adjustPropDefinitions"
# Test 2: Find other files using this utility to ensure consistent usage
echo "=== Searching for other files using adjustPropDefinitions ==="
rg "import.*adjustPropDefinitions"
Length of output: 6289
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the implementation details of adjustPropDefinitions in both components
echo "=== Examining monday_oauth adjustPropDefinitions implementation ==="
rg -A 15 "export function adjustPropDefinitions" components/monday_oauth/common/utils.mjs
echo -e "\n=== Examining gitlab_developer_app adjustPropDefinitions implementation ==="
rg -A 15 "export function adjustPropDefinitions" components/gitlab_developer_app/common/utils.mjs
Length of output: 1239
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's see the complete implementation as previous output was truncated
echo "=== Complete monday_oauth adjustPropDefinitions implementation ==="
cat components/monday_oauth/common/utils.mjs
echo -e "\n=== Examining usage context in create-update.mjs ==="
cat components/monday_oauth/actions/create-update/create-update.mjs
Length of output: 1626
components/monday_oauth/actions/create-subitem/create-subitem.mjs (2)
1-4: LGTM! Clean import structure for component sharing
The imports effectively separate OAuth-specific configuration while reusing the common functionality, aligning well with the component sharing objective.
6-9: Verify the property adjustment implementation
The property extraction looks good, but we should verify the implementation of adjustPropDefinitions to ensure it properly handles all property types.
✅ Verification successful
Let me get more context about the implementation of adjustPropDefinitions since the previous result was truncated.
Let me try a different approach to get the complete implementation.
Let me try one final time to get the complete implementation with even more context lines.
Property adjustment implementation is correct and consistently used
The adjustPropDefinitions utility correctly handles all property types:
- String properties are passed through unchanged
- Properties with
propDefinitionare properly adjusted by inserting the app reference - App-type properties are filtered out
- Other property types are preserved with their values
The implementation is consistently used across all Monday OAuth actions:
- create-board
- create-column
- create-group
- create-item
- create-subitem
- create-update
- get-column-values
- get-items-by-column-value
- update-column-values
- update-item-name
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the implementation of adjustPropDefinitions utility
# and its usage across other OAuth components for consistency
# Check the utility implementation
echo "Checking adjustPropDefinitions implementation:"
rg -A 10 "export.*adjustPropDefinitions" "components/monday_oauth/common/"
# Check its usage pattern across other components
echo "\nChecking usage patterns:"
rg "adjustPropDefinitions" "components/monday_oauth/actions/"
Length of output: 3567
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the complete implementation of adjustPropDefinitions
ast-grep --pattern 'export function adjustPropDefinitions($_) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 74
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the complete implementation using ripgrep with more context
rg -U --multiline --context 20 "export function adjustPropDefinitions" "components/monday_oauth/common/utils.mjs"
Length of output: 583
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the complete implementation using ripgrep with 40 lines of context
rg -U --multiline -B 5 -A 40 "export function adjustPropDefinitions" "components/monday_oauth/common/utils.mjs"
Length of output: 885
components/monday_oauth/actions/update-item-name/update-item-name.mjs (2)
1-4: LGTM: Clean import structure
The imports are well-organized, clearly separating the OAuth-specific components from the common functionality. The use of the utility function adjustPropDefinitions shows good separation of concerns.
6-9: Verify the completeness of property adjustments
The destructuring pattern effectively separates the common properties, but we should verify that all necessary properties are being adjusted correctly for the OAuth context.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the property adjustments by examining the implementation.
Let me check the actual implementation of the update-item-name action to understand the property handling.
Let me check the original Monday implementation to compare the properties.
Property adjustments are correctly implemented
The implementation correctly handles all necessary properties for the OAuth context:
- The original properties (boardId, itemId, itemName) are properly extracted from the common implementation
- These properties are correctly adjusted through
adjustPropDefinitionsfor OAuth context - The Monday OAuth app instance is correctly added to the props
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the structure of the original monday implementation to ensure
# we haven't missed any critical properties that need adjustment
# Check the original implementation's structure
cat ../../../monday/actions/update-item-name/update-item-name.mjs
# Check for other OAuth implementations using adjustPropDefinitions
rg -l "adjustPropDefinitions" components/monday_oauth/
Length of output: 1499
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of adjustPropDefinitions and its usage
ast-grep --pattern 'function adjustPropDefinitions' -A 10
rg "adjustPropDefinitions" components/monday_oauth/common/utils.mjs -A 5
Length of output: 281
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of update-item-name action
cat components/monday_oauth/actions/update-item-name/update-item-name.mjs
# Check the original props structure
rg "props.*update-item-name" -A 5
Length of output: 592
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the original Monday implementation
cat components/monday/actions/update-item-name/update-item-name.mjs
# Also check what properties are being adjusted in other similar actions
ast-grep --pattern 'props: {
$$$
}' components/monday_oauth/actions/update-item-name/update-item-name.mjs
Length of output: 1551
components/monday_oauth/actions/get-column-values/get-column-values.mjs (2)
1-4: LGTM! Clean import structure for component sharing.
The imports effectively separate the OAuth-specific configuration while reusing the common action implementation, aligning well with the component sharing objective.
6-9: Verify the adjustPropDefinitions utility implementation.
The property adjustment approach looks good, but let's verify the implementation of the utility function to ensure it handles all necessary OAuth-specific adjustments.
✅ Verification successful
The initial results show consistent usage across OAuth components, but we need to see the complete implementation to verify the OAuth-specific adjustments. Let's get the full function implementation using ast-grep.
Let's try using ripgrep with multiline mode and more context lines to see the complete function implementation.
The previous output was truncated. Let's increase the context lines to see the complete function implementation.
Property adjustment utility implementation is correct and consistently used
The adjustPropDefinitions utility correctly handles OAuth-specific adjustments by:
- Replacing the first element of propDefinition array with the OAuth app reference
- Preserving other property definition values
- Properly handling string props and non-propDefinition cases
- Filtering out null values (when type is "app")
The utility is consistently imported and used across all Monday OAuth components (both actions and sources).
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of adjustPropDefinitions utility
# and its usage across other OAuth components
# Check the utility implementation
echo "Checking adjustPropDefinitions implementation:"
rg -A 10 "export.*adjustPropDefinitions" "components/monday_oauth/common/"
# Check consistent usage across OAuth components
echo "\nVerifying consistent usage across components:"
rg "adjustPropDefinitions" "components/monday_oauth/"
Length of output: 5766
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the complete implementation of adjustPropDefinitions
ast-grep --pattern 'export function adjustPropDefinitions($_) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 74
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the complete implementation using ripgrep with more context
rg -U --multiline --context 20 "^export function adjustPropDefinitions" "components/monday_oauth/common/utils.mjs"
Length of output: 584
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the complete implementation with more context lines
rg -U --multiline --context 50 "^export function adjustPropDefinitions" "components/monday_oauth/common/utils.mjs"
Length of output: 888
components/monday_oauth/sources/new-subitem-update/new-subitem-update.mjs (2)
1-4: LGTM! Well-structured imports.
The imports effectively separate OAuth-specific configurations from common functionality, aligning with the component sharing objective.
6-9: Verify property adjustment implementation.
The property adjustment pattern is consistent with other OAuth modules. Let's verify the implementation of the utility function.
✅ Verification successful
Property adjustment implementation is correct and consistently used
The adjustPropDefinitions utility function is properly implemented and follows a consistent pattern across the Monday OAuth components. The implementation:
- Correctly handles prop definitions with app references
- Maintains proper property structure
- Is used identically in both
new-subitem-updateand other source files
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the adjustPropDefinitions implementation and its usage across OAuth modules
# Check the utility function implementation
echo "Checking adjustPropDefinitions implementation:"
rg -A 5 "export.*adjustPropDefinitions" "components/monday_oauth/common/utils.mjs"
# Verify consistent usage across OAuth modules
echo "\nChecking usage pattern across OAuth modules:"
rg "adjustPropDefinitions.*props.*app" "components/monday_oauth/**/*.mjs"
Length of output: 586
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more precise search for both the implementation and usage
# Check the complete implementation of adjustPropDefinitions
echo "Checking complete adjustPropDefinitions implementation:"
rg -A 15 "export.*adjustPropDefinitions" --type js
# Find all files that might use this function
echo "\nFinding files that use adjustPropDefinitions:"
rg --files-with-matches "adjustPropDefinitions"
# Check the actual usage patterns
echo "\nChecking usage patterns:"
rg "adjustPropDefinitions" --type js -A 2
Length of output: 3199
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the implementation and usage pattern specifically in monday_oauth
# Check the implementation in monday_oauth utils
echo "Implementation in monday_oauth utils:"
cat "components/monday_oauth/common/utils.mjs"
# Check a few example usages for consistency
echo "\nUsage in new-subitem-update:"
cat "components/monday_oauth/sources/new-subitem-update/new-subitem-update.mjs"
echo "\nUsage in another source file for comparison:"
cat "components/monday_oauth/sources/new-item/new-item.mjs"
Length of output: 2163
components/monday_oauth/actions/update-column-values/update-column-values.mjs (3)
1-4: LGTM! Well-structured imports.
The imports demonstrate good code reuse by leveraging existing functionality from the non-OAuth implementation while maintaining a clear separation between OAuth and non-OAuth components.
18-21: LGTM! Well-structured props configuration.
The props configuration correctly combines the OAuth app instance with the adjusted properties, maintaining consistency with the original implementation while adding OAuth-specific functionality.
6-9: Verify the property adjustment implementation.
The property adjustment logic looks clean, but we should verify the implementation of adjustPropDefinitions to ensure it correctly handles all property types.
✅ Verification successful
The implementation and usage analysis shows that adjustPropDefinitions is well-implemented and consistently used across the Monday OAuth components. Let me generate the final response:
Property adjustment implementation verified and approved
The adjustPropDefinitions utility correctly:
- Handles string properties directly
- Processes propDefinitions by injecting the app reference
- Filters out app-type properties and preserves other value types
- Is consistently used across 19 OAuth components for prop adjustments
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of adjustPropDefinitions utility
# and its usage across other OAuth components for consistency
# Check the implementation of adjustPropDefinitions
echo "Checking adjustPropDefinitions implementation:"
cat components/monday_oauth/common/utils.mjs
# Check for consistent usage pattern across other OAuth components
echo -e "\nChecking usage pattern across OAuth components:"
rg -l "adjustPropDefinitions" components/monday_oauth/
Length of output: 2372
components/monday_oauth/sources/column-value-updated/column-value-updated.mjs (2)
1-4: LGTM! Clean separation of concerns in imports.
The imports effectively separate the OAuth-specific code (monday_oauth.app.mjs), shared functionality (monday/sources/column-value-updated), and utilities (common/utils.mjs), aligning well with the component sharing objective.
6-9: Verify the property adjustment utility function.
The code correctly extracts and adjusts properties from the common implementation. Let's verify the utility function implementation.
✅ Verification successful
Property adjustment utility is correctly implemented and consistently used
The adjustPropDefinitions utility function is properly implemented in components/monday_oauth/common/utils.mjs and serves to:
- Preserve string properties as-is
- For object properties with
propDefinition, it injects the OAuth app as the first parameter - Maintains consistent usage across all Monday OAuth components (19 files verified)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the adjustPropDefinitions utility function implementation
# and its usage across other OAuth components
# Check the utility function implementation
echo "Checking adjustPropDefinitions implementation:"
rg -A 5 "export.*adjustPropDefinitions" "components/monday_oauth/common/utils.mjs"
# Check for consistent usage pattern across other components
echo "\nChecking usage pattern in other components:"
rg "adjustPropDefinitions.*props.*app" "components/monday_oauth/"
Length of output: 2844
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's get the complete implementation of adjustPropDefinitions
echo "Complete implementation of adjustPropDefinitions:"
rg -A 15 "export.*adjustPropDefinitions" "components/monday_oauth/common/utils.mjs"
# Let's also check if there's any common prop definition that's being adjusted
echo "\nChecking common prop definitions:"
rg -A 10 "const common = {" "components/monday_oauth/common"
Length of output: 798
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's get the complete implementation of adjustPropDefinitions with more context
echo "Complete implementation of adjustPropDefinitions:"
rg -A 25 "export.*adjustPropDefinitions" "components/monday_oauth/common/utils.mjs"
# Let's fix the regex for common props
echo "\nChecking common prop definitions:"
rg -A 10 "^const common =" "components/monday_oauth/common"
Length of output: 906
components/monday_oauth/sources/subitem-name-updated/subitem-name-updated.mjs (2)
1-4: LGTM! Well-structured imports for component sharing.
The import structure effectively bridges the OAuth and API implementations while maintaining clear separation of concerns.
6-9: Verify the structure of the common module.
The destructuring pattern looks good, but let's verify the structure of the imported common module to ensure all necessary properties are properly shared.
✅ Verification successful
Common module structure is properly implemented and shared
The verification shows a well-structured inheritance chain:
- The OAuth component correctly imports from the base Monday component
- The base component properly extends the common-webhook module
- All necessary properties (name, description, type, props) are correctly shared and overridden
The destructuring pattern is consistent with the module structure and follows the established pattern across other Monday OAuth components.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the structure of the common module and its usage pattern
# across other similar components
# Check the structure of the common module
echo "Checking common module structure:"
cat components/monday/sources/subitem-name-updated/subitem-name-updated.mjs
# Look for similar patterns in other OAuth components
echo -e "\nChecking usage patterns in other OAuth components:"
rg -l "adjustPropDefinitions" components/monday_oauth/sources/
Length of output: 383
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the common module structure
# First, let's check where the common module is imported from
rg -l "import.*common.*from" components/monday_oauth/sources/subitem-name-updated/
# Then check the actual common module content
echo -e "\nChecking for common module definition:"
fd common.mjs components/monday_oauth --exec cat {}
# Look for similar destructuring patterns
echo -e "\nChecking similar destructuring patterns:"
rg "const \{.*\} = common;" components/monday_oauth/sources/ -A 1
Length of output: 476
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the file and its imports to understand the common module source
# Check the full content of the file
echo "Checking the full content of subitem-name-updated.mjs:"
cat components/monday_oauth/sources/subitem-name-updated/subitem-name-updated.mjs
# Look for common module imports across the codebase
echo -e "\nChecking common module imports:"
rg "from.*common" components/monday_oauth/sources/ -B 1 -A 1
# Check if there's a common.mjs in the same directory
echo -e "\nChecking for common.mjs in the same directory:"
ls -la components/monday_oauth/sources/subitem-name-updated/
Length of output: 3411
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the common module that's being imported from monday/sources
# Check the content of the imported common module
echo "Checking the content of the imported common module:"
cat components/monday/sources/subitem-name-updated/subitem-name-updated.mjs
# Check if this pattern is consistent across other components
echo -e "\nChecking for similar imports from monday/sources:"
rg "import.*from.*monday/sources/" components/monday_oauth/sources/
Length of output: 2556
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the common-webhook.mjs that's imported in the base module
# Check the content of common-webhook.mjs
echo "Checking the content of common-webhook.mjs:"
cat components/monday/sources/common/common-webhook.mjs
# Check if this pattern is consistent
echo -e "\nChecking for other imports of common-webhook.mjs:"
rg "import.*common-webhook" components/monday/sources/
Length of output: 3698
components/monday_oauth/actions/get-items-by-column-value/get-items-by-column-value.mjs (3)
1-4: LGTM! Clean import organization.
The imports are well-organized, separating app-specific, common action, and utility imports. This structure clearly shows the relationship between the OAuth implementation and the original API key implementation.
11-22: Review version management strategy.
The module is currently at version "0.0.1". Consider the following recommendations:
- Document the versioning strategy for shared components
- Ensure version numbers align between the API key and OAuth implementations
- Consider adding a comment linking to the original API key implementation version
Let's check the version of the original implementation:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Compare versions between API key and OAuth implementations
# Expected: Should show the version from the original implementation for comparison
rg -A 5 'version:' components/monday/actions/get-items-by-column-value/get-items-by-column-value.mjs18-21: Verify property adjustment completeness.
Ensure that all necessary properties from the original implementation are properly adjusted for the OAuth context.
Let's check the property definitions in both implementations:
✅ Verification successful
Let me try another approach to compare the properties between both implementations.
Let me check the common utilities and the column-values.mjs file to fully understand the property adjustments.
Based on the code analysis so far, I can generate a final response as we have enough information to verify the property adjustments.
Property adjustments are correctly implemented
The OAuth implementation properly handles all necessary properties through:
- Importing and reusing the original component's properties via the
commonimport - Using the
adjustPropDefinitionsutility which:- Correctly maps all propDefinitions to use the OAuth app instance
- Preserves all other property attributes
- Properly filters and handles special cases
- Adding the OAuth
mondayapp instance while spreading the adjusted props
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Compare property definitions between implementations
# Expected: Should show property definitions from both files for comparison
echo "=== OAuth Implementation Properties ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'props: {
$$$
}' components/monday_oauth/actions/get-items-by-column-value/get-items-by-column-value.mjs
echo "=== Original Implementation Properties ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'props: {
$$$
}' components/monday/actions/get-items-by-column-value/get-items-by-column-value.mjs
Length of output: 620
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine both files content to compare properties
echo "=== OAuth Implementation ==="
cat components/monday_oauth/actions/get-items-by-column-value/get-items-by-column-value.mjs
echo -e "\n=== Original Implementation ==="
cat components/monday/actions/get-items-by-column-value/get-items-by-column-value.mjs
Length of output: 2614
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the utility function and common properties
echo "=== Adjustment Utility ==="
cat components/monday_oauth/common/utils.mjs
echo -e "\n=== Column Values Common ==="
cat components/monday/common/column-values.mjs
Length of output: 1080
components/monday_oauth/sources/subitem-column-value-updated/subitem-column-value-updated.mjs (3)
1-4: LGTM! Imports are well-structured for component sharing.
The imports correctly reference both the OAuth-specific components and the shared components from the existing monday implementation, aligning with the PR's objective of component sharing.
11-22: LGTM! Module exports maintain compatibility while adding OAuth specifics.
The export structure effectively combines the shared functionality from the common implementation while properly namespacing it for the OAuth context through the unique key.
6-9: Verify the property adjustment implementation.
The property extraction and adjustment logic looks good, but let's verify the implementation of the adjustPropDefinitions utility function to ensure consistent property handling between the API key and OAuth implementations.
✅ Verification successful
Property adjustment implementation is consistent and correctly used
The adjustPropDefinitions utility function is properly implemented in components/monday_oauth/common/utils.mjs and is consistently used across all OAuth components. The implementation:
- Correctly handles both string and object property definitions
- Properly injects the app instance into propDefinitions
- Maintains consistent property handling between components
- Is used uniformly in both actions and sources
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the adjustPropDefinitions utility implementation
# and its usage across other OAuth components
# Check the implementation of adjustPropDefinitions
echo "Checking adjustPropDefinitions implementation:"
cat components/monday_oauth/common/utils.mjs
# Check for consistent usage pattern across other OAuth components
echo -e "\nChecking usage pattern in other components:"
rg "adjustPropDefinitions" components/monday_oauth/
Length of output: 5815
components/monday_oauth/common/utils.mjs (1)
15-17: Verify array destructuring safety.
The array destructuring assumes propDefinition is always an array with at least one element. This could throw an error if propDefinition is an empty array.
✅ Verification successful
After analyzing the code context, I can now provide a final response:
Array destructuring is safe in this context
The adjustPropDefinitions function is used to process prop definitions that are imported from common components. The destructuring is safe because:
- The function only applies the destructuring when
propDefinitionexists (inside anif (propDefinition)check) - When
propDefinitionexists, it's being used to construct a new array with[app, ...otherDefs], indicating it's a deliberate pattern for prop definition adjustment - The pattern is consistently used across multiple components (Monday and GitLab) suggesting it's a well-established convention
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for propDefinition usage across the codebase to verify the array structure
ast-grep --pattern 'propDefinition: [$$$]'
Length of output: 44
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find propDefinition usage
rg -A 5 "propDefinition" --type js --type mjs
# Also search for the file content to understand the context
cat components/monday_oauth/common/utils.mjs
Length of output: 894
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for files that might be using this utility function
rg -l "adjustPropDefinitions"
# Also search for any test files related to this utility
fd -e test.js -e test.mjs -e spec.js -e spec.mjs
Length of output: 2848
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check how propDefinition is used in one of the files that uses adjustPropDefinitions
cat components/monday_oauth/sources/new-item/new-item.mjs
# Also check a GitLab component to see if the pattern is similar
cat components/gitlab_developer_app/sources/new-issue/new-issue.mjs
Length of output: 1061
components/monday_oauth/sources/new-subitem-update/new-subitem-update.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/monday_oauth/sources/subitem-name-updated/subitem-name-updated.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Resolves #14603
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Enhancements
Version Update