Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create throw-error.mjs #13998

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 18, 2024
Merged

Create throw-error.mjs #13998

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 18, 2024

Conversation

dannyroosevelt
Copy link
Collaborator

@dannyroosevelt dannyroosevelt commented Sep 18, 2024

WHY

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a "Throw Error" action component for customizable error generation in workflows.
    • Added properties for specifying error class and message to enhance error handling.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling flexibility by allowing both predefined and custom error types.
  • Chores

    • Updated the version of the @pipedream/error package to 0.0.2.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 18, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
pipedream ❌ Failed (Inspect) Sep 18, 2024 9:39pm
3 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Sep 18, 2024 9:39pm
pipedream-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Sep 18, 2024 9:39pm
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Sep 18, 2024 9:39pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 18, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new action component named "Throw Error" in the error handling system, allowing users to throw errors within workflows. It includes properties for specifying the error's name and message, and utilizes a method to dynamically create and throw errors. Additionally, enhancements to the error app include new properties for more descriptive error handling. The package version is updated to reflect these changes.

Changes

Files Change Summary
components/error/actions/throw-error/throw-error.mjs, components/error/error.app.mjs Introduced "Throw Error" action component with properties name and errorMessage. Added maybeCreateAndThrowError method for dynamic error creation.
components/error/package.json Updated package version from "0.0.1" to "0.0.2".

Suggested labels

ai-assisted

Suggested reviewers

  • michelle0927
  • GTFalcao

🐰 In the meadow where errors lay,
A new way to throw them, hip-hip-hooray!
With names and messages, clear and bright,
Debugging now feels just right!
So hop along, let errors fly,
In workflows, we’ll reach for the sky! 🌼


Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between de6204f and bb50bcc.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • components/error/actions/throw-error/throw-error.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/error/error.app.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/error/package.json (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • components/error/package.json
Additional comments not posted (4)
components/error/actions/throw-error/throw-error.mjs (1)

1-27: LGTM!

The "Throw Error" action component is well-structured and follows best practices. It provides a useful functionality to quickly throw errors in workflows.

Some key observations:

  • The component has a clear name, version, key, and description.
  • It imports and uses the error module correctly.
  • The props are defined using the propDefinition syntax.
  • The run method is concise and uses the maybeCreateAndThrowError method appropriately.

Overall, the code looks good and is ready to be merged.

components/error/error.app.mjs (3)

4-19: LGTM!

The new name and errorMessage properties in propDefinitions provide a nice way to customize the error class and message. The descriptions are clear and the default/optional settings make sense.


21-30: LGTM!

The maybeCreateAndThrowError method nicely handles the case where the specified error class already exists and is a valid subclass of Error. The checks are appropriate and throwing an instance of the error class with the provided message is the correct behavior.


32-38: LGTM!

The DynamicError class is a good fallback for when the specified error class doesn't exist. Extending Error, setting the name property, and throwing an instance with the provided message is all handled correctly.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@dannyroosevelt dannyroosevelt merged commit 4cb876b into master Sep 18, 2024
12 of 13 checks passed
@dannyroosevelt dannyroosevelt deleted the danny/error-actions branch September 18, 2024 22:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants