New Components - the_bookie #13995
New Components - the_bookie #13995
Conversation
luancazarine
added
the
ai-assisted
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThe changes introduce multiple new functionalities within "The Bookie" application, including actions for creating contacts and sales invoices, searching for contacts, and emitting events related to newly created contacts and invoices. New utility functions and constants are added to enhance data handling and standardization. The application’s architecture is improved to support real-time data updates and efficient API interactions, thereby expanding its capabilities in managing contacts and invoices. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant API
participant Database
User->>API: Create Contact
API->>Database: Validate and Save Contact
Database-->>API: Contact Created
API-->>User: Confirmation Message
User->>API: Create Invoice
API->>Database: Validate and Save Invoice
Database-->>API: Invoice Created
API-->>User: Confirmation Message
User->>API: Search Contact
API->>Database: Retrieve Contacts
Database-->>API: Contacts Found
API-->>User: List of Contacts
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Actions - Create Contact - Create Sales Invoice - Find Contacts Sources - New Contact Created - New Invoice Created - New Invoice Paid
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 14
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
components/the_bookie/sources/new-contact-created/test-event.mjs (1)
1-28: LGTM! The test event object structure aligns with the requirements.The exported test event object contains the necessary properties to represent a contact entity, including:
- Identifiers:
id,organisation_kvk_number,organisation_btw_number- Organizational info:
organisation_name,is_supplier,is_client- Contact methods:
telephone_number,mobile_number- Address details:
street,street_number,postal_code,town,country- Financial metrics:
total_sales_amount_excl_btw,total_purchase_amount_excl_btw, etc.The property names are descriptive and follow a consistent naming convention. The object is directly exported as the default export, making it easily accessible for testing purposes.
Consider adding a few more suggestions to enhance the test event:
Include sample data for the
telephone_number, andmobile_numberproperties to better represent a realistic contact.Add a
websiteproperty to capture the contact's website URL, as it is a common attribute for organizations.Consider including a
created_atandupdated_attimestamp properties to track the creation and modification dates of the contact.These additions would make the test event more comprehensive and representative of real-world contact data.
components/the_bookie/sources/common/base.mjs (2)
22-26: Simplify sorting by ordering items ascendinglyCurrently,
filterItems()sorts items in descending order byid, and thenemitEvent()reverses the array to process items in ascending order. You can simplify the code by sorting the items in ascending order directly and removing the.reverse()call.Apply these diffs:
In
filterItems():return items .filter((item) => item.id > lastId) - .sort((a, b) => b.id - a.id); + .sort((a, b) => a.id - b.id);In
emitEvent():for (const item of responseArray.reverse()) { + for (const item of responseArray) {Also applies to: 47-47
41-43: Useslice()to limit the number of resultsInstead of truncating the array by setting
responseArray.length, consider usingslice()for clarity and to avoid side effects.Apply this diff:
if (maxResults && (responseArray.length > maxResults)) { - responseArray.length = maxResults; + responseArray = responseArray.slice(0, maxResults); }components/the_bookie/the_bookie.app.mjs (2)
42-49: Avoid returningnullin_datahelper methodReturning
nullfrom the_datamethod whendatais falsy may cause issues with requests that expect an object, even if it's empty. Instead, return an empty object to ensure consistency.Apply this diff to return an empty object when
datais falsy:_data(data) { - return data - ? { - ...data, - admin_id: `${this.$auth.admin_id}`, - } - : null; + return { + ...data, + admin_id: `${this.$auth.admin_id}`, + }; },
98-118: Clarify pagination loop termination conditionIn the
paginatemethod,hasMoreis assignedresults.length, which relies on JavaScript's truthy/falsy evaluation. For better readability and to avoid potential confusion, explicitly compare the length to determine if more results are available.Apply this diff for clarity:
do { // Pagination logic... hasMore = results.length; - } while (hasMore); + } while (hasMore > 0);
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (14)
- components/the_bookie/actions/create-contact/create-contact.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/the_bookie/actions/create-sales-invoice/create-sales-invoice.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/the_bookie/actions/find-contact/find-contact.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/the_bookie/common/constants.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/the_bookie/common/utils.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/the_bookie/package.json (2 hunks)
- components/the_bookie/sources/common/base.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/the_bookie/sources/new-contact-created/new-contact-created.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/the_bookie/sources/new-contact-created/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/the_bookie/sources/new-invoice-created/new-invoice-created.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/the_bookie/sources/new-invoice-created/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/the_bookie/sources/new-invoice-paid/new-invoice-paid.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/the_bookie/sources/new-invoice-paid/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/the_bookie/the_bookie.app.mjs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- components/the_bookie/sources/new-invoice-created/test-event.mjs
Additional comments not posted (27)
components/the_bookie/common/constants.mjs (1)
1-1: Clarify the purpose and reasoning behind the chosen value.The addition of the
LIMITconstant is a good practice for promoting consistency and maintainability across the codebase.However, the chosen value of 100 seems arbitrary without additional context. Please provide clarification on the specific purpose of this limit and the reasoning behind the selected value to ensure it aligns with the intended use cases.
components/the_bookie/sources/new-invoice-paid/test-event.mjs (1)
1-13: LGTM!The test event object is well-structured and aligns with the purpose described in the AI summary. The property names are descriptive and the values are of appropriate types. This object can serve as a good reference for the expected structure and data of an invoice payment event.
components/the_bookie/package.json (2)
3-3: Version update looks good!The version has been updated from
0.0.1to0.1.0, following semantic versioning. This indicates a minor version release, suggesting that new backward-compatible functionality has been added.
15-17: Verify the integration of the new dependency.A new dependency
@pipedream/platformwith version^3.0.1has been introduced. Ensure that the component integrates correctly with this new dependency and that there are no unintended side effects or breaking changes.Run the following script to verify the dependency usage:
Verification successful
Dependency integration verified and aligned with project standards
The new dependency
@pipedream/platform(version ^3.0.1) has been correctly added to thepackage.jsonfile for the_bookie component. While we don't see direct usage in this specific component, the dependency is extensively used across the project for HTTP requests, error handling, and other utilities. This addition aligns with the overall architecture and development practices of the project.Key observations:
- Widespread use of
import { axios } from "@pipedream/platform"for HTTP requests- Utilization of
ConfigurationErrorandDEFAULT_POLLING_SOURCE_TIMER_INTERVALfrom the package- Consistent usage pattern across various components
The integration of this dependency in the_bookie component is likely to facilitate standardization and potential future use of these common utilities.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new dependency `@pipedream/platform`. # Test: Search for the dependency import. Expect: At least one occurrence. rg --type javascript -A 5 $'@pipedream/platform'Length of output: 82
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the content of package.json echo "Contents of package.json:" cat components/the_bookie/package.json echo -e "\n--- Searching for @pipedream/platform usage ---" # Find JavaScript files and search for @pipedream/platform fd -e js -e jsx -e ts -e tsx | xargs grep -n "@pipedream/platform" || echo "No usage found"Length of output: 14297
components/the_bookie/sources/new-invoice-created/new-invoice-created.mjs (5)
1-2: LGTM!The import statements are correctly defined and follow the proper syntax and naming conventions. The common base module and sample emit function are imported from the expected locations.
4-11: LGTM!The module is correctly exported and extends the common base module. The module's metadata properties are appropriately defined, following consistent naming conventions and specifying the correct version, type, and deduplication strategy.
12-20: LGTM!The methods for the module are correctly defined, including the common methods from the base module and the custom
getFunctionandgetSummarymethods. ThegetFunctionmethod returns the appropriate function for retrieving invoices, and thegetSummarymethod generates a formatted summary string for each emitted event.
21-21: LGTM!The
sampleEmitfunction is correctly included in the exported module, allowing it to be accessed and utilized for testing or generating sample events.
1-22: Code follows best practices and demonstrates good modularity.The code is well-structured and follows best practices for modularity and extensibility. The use of a common base module promotes code reuse and maintainability. The metadata properties provide clear documentation, and the custom methods are concise and focused on specific functionalities. Overall, the code exhibits good quality and adherence to best practices.
components/the_bookie/sources/new-contact-created/new-contact-created.mjs (4)
1-2: LGTM!The import statements are correctly defined, importing the necessary modules for the event source.
4-11: LGTM!The exported object correctly extends the common base module and includes the necessary attributes for the event source. The metadata provides clear information about the purpose and behavior of the event source.
21-21: LGTM!Including the
sampleEmitmodule in the exported object is a good practice for providing a sample event emitter for testing and demonstration purposes. It can help developers understand how to use the event source and verify its functionality.
12-20: Verify the existence oftheBookieobject andlistContactsfunction.The methods are correctly defined, with
getFunctionreturning a reference to thelistContactsfunction andgetSummaryproviding a concise summary of the event.However, please ensure that the
theBookieobject and itslistContactsfunction are properly defined and accessible within the scope of this module.Run the following script to verify the existence of
theBookieobject andlistContactsfunction:Verification successful
The
theBookieobject andlistContactsfunction are correctly used and exist in the codebase.The verification process confirms that:
- The
theBookieobject is widely used across the codebase and is imported from "../../the_bookie.app.mjs".- The
listContactsfunction is indeed a method of thetheBookieobject, as evidenced by its usage in the file under review.The code in question is consistent with the rest of the codebase and uses the
theBookieobject and itslistContactsmethod correctly.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of `theBookie` object and `listContacts` function. # Test: Search for the `theBookie` object. Expect: Occurrences in the codebase. rg --type javascript $'theBookie' # Test: Search for the `listContacts` function. Expect: Occurrences within the `theBookie` object. rg --type javascript $'theBookie\\.listContacts'Length of output: 151
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of `theBookie` object and `listContacts` function using alternative methods. # Search for JavaScript files and grep for 'theBookie' echo "Searching for 'theBookie':" fd -e js -e mjs -e jsx -e ts -e tsx | xargs grep -n 'theBookie' echo -e "\nSearching for 'theBookie.listContacts':" fd -e js -e mjs -e jsx -e ts -e tsx | xargs grep -n 'theBookie\.listContacts' # Use ast-grep to search for 'theBookie' object and 'listContacts' function echo -e "\nSearching for 'theBookie' object using ast-grep:" ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'const theBookie = $_' echo -e "\nSearching for 'listContacts' function using ast-grep:" ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'listContacts: function($_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 2288
components/the_bookie/sources/new-invoice-paid/new-invoice-paid.mjs (2)
17-19: Verify the existence and initialization of thetheBookieobject and itslistInvoicesmethod.The code assumes that the
theBookieobject exists and has alistInvoicesmethod. Please ensure that thetheBookieobject is properly initialized and has the expected method.You can add a null check before accessing the method to prevent potential runtime errors:
getFunction() { return this.theBookie && this.theBookie.listInvoices; }
20-22: Verify the structure of theitemobject and handle cases where theidproperty may be missing.The code assumes that the
itemobject has anidproperty. Please ensure that theitemobject always contains the expectedidproperty.You can add a null check or provide a default value to handle cases where the
idproperty may be missing:getSummary(item) { const invoiceId = item && item.id ? item.id : 'Unknown'; return `Invoice ${invoiceId} paid`; }components/the_bookie/common/utils.mjs (3)
1-6: LGTM!The
checkTmpfunction correctly ensures that the given filename is prefixed with/tmp, providing a standardized way to handle temporary file paths. The implementation is concise and effective.
8-31: LGTM!The
parseObjectfunction provides a robust way to handle parsing of objects and arrays. It correctly distinguishes between different input types (array, string, or other) and applies the appropriate parsing logic. The use of a try-catch block ensures that parsing errors are gracefully handled by returning the original input. The implementation is clear and covers various scenarios effectively.
33-37: LGTM!The
capitalizefunction correctly capitalizes the first character of the given string. It handles falsy inputs by returningnulland ensures that the input is treated as a string by usingtoString(). The implementation is straightforward and effective.components/the_bookie/actions/find-contact/find-contact.mjs (5)
1-3: LGTM!The import statements are correctly used in the rest of the file.
4-30: LGTM!The action definition follows the expected structure, and the
propsare correctly defined with appropriate types, labels, and descriptions. The inclusion of a link to the documentation in thedescriptionproperty is helpful.
31-40: LGTM!The
runmethod correctly uses thepaginatemethod to handle the search operation asynchronously, and thesearchContactfunction is called with the appropriate parameters. The use of thecapitalizefunction ensures consistency in the boolean values.
42-46: LGTM!The use of
for await...ofloop is appropriate for iterating over the asynchronousresponse, and pushing each item into theresponseArrayallows for collecting all the results.
48-50: LGTM!Exporting a summary using
$.exportis a good practice to provide a quick overview of the results, and returning theresponseArrayallows for further processing of the found contacts if needed.components/the_bookie/actions/create-contact/create-contact.mjs (2)
4-107: LGTM!The action definition looks good:
- The metadata (
key,name,description,version,type) is appropriately defined.- The
propscover a comprehensive set of properties for creating a contact, with clear labels and descriptions.- Most of the
propsare marked as optional, providing flexibility in specifying contact details.
108-138: LGTM!The
runmethod looks good:
- The validation check for
isClientorisSupplierensures that at least one of them is true before proceeding.- The API call is made with the appropriate contact details passed in the
dataobject.- The summary message provides useful information about the created contact's ID.
- Returning the API response allows for further processing of the created contact data if needed.
components/the_bookie/the_bookie.app.mjs (2)
1-2: Imports are correctly definedThe import statements for
axiosandLIMITare appropriate and correctly referenced.
86-97: Potential redundancy in addingadmin_idtoparamsIn the
searchContactmethod,admin_idis added toparams, but it's also added in the_datamethod todata. Verify whetheradmin_idneeds to be included in bothparamsanddatato prevent duplicate data and potential conflicts.Run the following script to check where
admin_idis being appended:
| filterItems(items) { | ||
| return items.filter((item) => item.state === 20); | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use a constant or enum for the state value.
The magic number 20 is used directly in the code to represent the "paid" state. This reduces readability and maintainability.
Consider defining a constant or enum for the state values and use that instead of the magic number. For example:
const INVOICE_STATES = {
PAID: 20,
// other states...
};
filterItems(items) {
return items.filter((item) => item.state === INVOICE_STATES.PAID);
}| const response = this.theBookie.paginate({ | ||
| fn: this.getFunction(), | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure getFunction() is implemented in subclasses
The method getFunction() is called but not defined in this base class. If it's intended to be implemented by subclasses, consider documenting this requirement or providing a default implementation that throws an error to guide developers.
| summary: this.getSummary(item), | ||
| ts: Date.parse(new Date()), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure getSummary() is implemented in subclasses
Similarly, getSummary(item) is called but not defined. If subclasses should implement this method, adding documentation or a default method that raises an error can help prevent runtime issues.
| this.$emit(item, { | ||
| id: item.id, | ||
| summary: this.getSummary(item), | ||
| ts: Date.parse(new Date()), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix timestamp calculation in event emission
Using Date.parse(new Date()) returns NaN because Date.parse() expects a string, but new Date() returns a Date object. To get the current timestamp, use Date.now().
Apply this diff to fix the timestamp calculation:
ts: Date.parse(new Date()),
+ ts: Date.now(),Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| ts: Date.parse(new Date()), | |
| ts: Date.now(), |
| const response = this.theBookie.paginate({ | ||
| fn: this.getFunction(), | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| let responseArray = []; | ||
| for await (const item of response) { | ||
| responseArray.push(item); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling for the pagination process
Currently, if this.theBookie.paginate() or this.getFunction() throw an error, it will be unhandled. Consider adding a try-catch block to handle potential errors gracefully and log meaningful messages.
Example:
const response = this.theBookie.paginate({
fn: this.getFunction(),
});
+ try {
let responseArray = [];
for await (const item of response) {
responseArray.push(item);
}
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error("Error during pagination:", error);
+ // Handle error accordingly
+ }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
components/the_bookie/actions/create-sales-invoice/create-sales-invoice.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/the_bookie/actions/create-sales-invoice/create-sales-invoice.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/the_bookie/actions/create-sales-invoice/create-sales-invoice.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/the_bookie/actions/create-sales-invoice/create-sales-invoice.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/the_bookie/actions/create-sales-invoice/create-sales-invoice.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Resolves #13973.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
Version Update