Google Docs Usability Audit / Improvements #13960
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new module that enhances Google Drive integration by enabling the monitoring of specific folders for new Google Docs documents. This module builds upon existing functionalities, allowing users to specify folders to watch for new documents, with a default to the root folder. Several methods have been added to facilitate document retrieval, processing, and event emission for both newly created and updated documents. Changes
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files selected for processing (1)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
components/google_docs/sources/common/base.mjs (1)
24-28: Consider extracting the magic number as a constant.The
deployhook implementation looks good. It correctly emits sample records on the first run by callinggetDocumentsandemitFilesmethods.However, consider extracting the magic number
5used as the limit forgetDocumentsas a constant for better readability and maintainability.+const SAMPLE_RECORDS_LIMIT = 5; async deploy() { // Emit sample records on the first run - const docs = await this.getDocuments(5); + const docs = await this.getDocuments(SAMPLE_RECORDS_LIMIT); await this.emitFiles(docs); },
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (12)
- components/google_docs/actions/append-image/append-image.mjs (2 hunks)
- components/google_docs/actions/append-text/append-text.mjs (2 hunks)
- components/google_docs/actions/create-document-from-text/create-document-from-text.mjs (0 hunks)
- components/google_docs/actions/create-document/create-document.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/google_docs/actions/get-document/get-document.mjs (2 hunks)
- components/google_docs/actions/replace-image/replace-image.mjs (2 hunks)
- components/google_docs/actions/replace-text/replace-text.mjs (2 hunks)
- components/google_docs/google_docs.app.mjs (2 hunks)
- components/google_docs/package.json (2 hunks)
- components/google_docs/sources/common/base.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/google_docs/sources/document-updated/document-updated.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/google_docs/sources/new-document-created/new-document-created.mjs (1 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (1)
- components/google_docs/actions/create-document-from-text/create-document-from-text.mjs
Additional comments not posted (49)
components/google_docs/package.json (2)
3-3: LGTM!The version bump to
0.4.0is appropriate for the significant changes in this PR.
16-16: Verify compatibility with the updated@googleapis/docslibrary.The major version update of
@googleapis/docsfrom0.2.0to3.3.0is a substantial change. Please ensure that:
- The codebase is compatible with any breaking changes in the library's API.
- The code is adapted to leverage any new features or improvements, if applicable.
- Thorough testing is performed to confirm the integration works as expected with the updated library.
Run the following script to find usage of the
@googleapis/docslibrary in the codebase:Review the usage to ensure compatibility with the updated library version.
Verification successful
Verify compatibility and consider optimizations with the updated
@googleapis/docslibrary.The code in
google_docs.app.mjsappears to be compatible with the updated@googleapis/docslibrary (version 3.3.0). The implementation uses standard Google Docs API methods that are likely to remain consistent across versions. However, given the significant version jump from 0.2.0 to 3.3.0, consider the following actions:
- Thoroughly test all Google Docs-related functionality to ensure there are no subtle breaking changes in method signatures or return types.
- Review the changelog or release notes for
@googleapis/docsto identify any new features or optimizations that could enhance your implementation.- Consider updating your error handling to account for any new error types or codes introduced in the new version.
- If possible, set up integration tests to catch any potential issues that might arise from the library update.
While the current implementation seems compatible, taking these steps will ensure optimal use of the updated library and catch any unforeseen issues.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find usage of the `@googleapis/docs` library in the codebase. # Test: Search for the library import. Expect: Occurrences of the import statement. rg --type javascript -A 5 $'@googleapis/docs'Length of output: 79
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find usage of the `@googleapis/docs` library in the codebase. # Search for CommonJS and ES6 import patterns echo "Searching for library imports:" rg "require\(['\"']@googleapis/docs['\"']\)|from ['\"']@googleapis/docs['\"']" # Search for the library in package.json files echo -e "\nSearching for library in package.json files:" rg '"@googleapis/docs"' $(fd -g 'package.json') # List all JavaScript and TypeScript files echo -e "\nListing all JavaScript and TypeScript files:" fd -e js -e ts -e jsx -e tsxLength of output: 124524
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: View the contents of the google_docs.app.mjs file echo "Contents of components/google_docs/google_docs.app.mjs:" cat components/google_docs/google_docs.app.mjsLength of output: 4777
components/google_docs/actions/get-document/get-document.mjs (4)
6-6: LGTM!The updated description text is more clear and explicit. Good change!
7-7: LGTM!The minor version bump aligns with the semantic versioning convention for the introduced enhancements.
18-18: LGTM!Including the
$parameter in therunmethod signature aligns with the best practices for Pipedream components. It provides access to additional context and utilities without affecting the core functionality.
20-20: LGTM!Exporting a summary message is a great addition to enhance the user experience. It provides immediate feedback upon successful execution and includes the relevant document ID. Well done!
components/google_docs/actions/append-text/append-text.mjs (6)
6-6: LGTM!The updated description referring to "the documentation" enhances clarity.
7-7: LGTM!The version increment to
0.1.3aligns with the semantic versioning convention for a patch release.
31-31: LGTM!The change simplifies the code by eliminating the unnecessary
textobject construction.
33-33: LGTM!The change allows the user to control whether the text is appended at the beginning of the document.
34-35: LGTM!The changes enhance the functionality and clarity of the code:
- Retrieving the updated document object provides more information to the caller.
- The updated summary message specifies the document ID, improving clarity.
36-36: LGTM!Returning the document object instead of just the document ID provides more useful information to the caller.
components/google_docs/actions/append-image/append-image.mjs (6)
6-6: LGTM!The rephrasing improves clarity by explicitly referring to "documentation".
7-7: LGTM!Incrementing the version number is appropriate given the changes made to the component.
31-33: LGTM!The change simplifies the code by directly passing the
imageUrito theappendImagemethod, which is a cleaner approach.
34-34: LGTM!Retrieving the document after appending the image is necessary to return the updated document object.
35-35: LGTM!The updated summary message provides more informative feedback to the user by including the document ID.
36-36: LGTM!Returning the entire document object provides more flexibility and information to the caller, which is a good improvement.
components/google_docs/actions/replace-image/replace-image.mjs (2)
6-6: LGTM!The updated description improves clarity by explicitly mentioning "documentation" instead of just "docs".
7-7: Version increment looks good.The version has been bumped to "0.0.4", which aligns with the semantic versioning convention for a patch release containing bug fixes or minor improvements.
components/google_docs/sources/new-document-created/new-document-created.mjs (4)
1-2: LGTM!The import statement is correct and follows the expected pattern for importing a common base module.
3-11: LGTM!The exported object correctly extends the common base module and defines appropriate metadata properties to describe the module's purpose and characteristics.
13-19: LGTM!The
generateMetamethod correctly formats the metadata for emitted events by including the document ID and a timestamp.
20-36: LGTM!The
processChangesmethod correctly checks for newly created documents since the last recorded creation time. It constructs an appropriate query to filter and order the results, emits the found files as events, and updates the last recorded creation time. The logic is sound and follows the expected behavior.components/google_docs/actions/replace-text/replace-text.mjs (4)
6-6: LGTM!The grammatical error has been fixed and the link text has been updated for better clarity.
7-7: LGTM!The version increment is justified based on the changes made in this PR.
49-50: LGTM!The updated summary message provides a more informative confirmation of the text replacement operation, and returning the document object aligns with the previous change.
48-48: Verify the impact on the consumers of this action.Returning the entire document object instead of just the document ID provides more comprehensive information, which is a good enhancement.
However, please ensure that the consumers of this action (if any) are updated to handle the new return value structure.
Run the following script to verify the usage of the return value:
components/google_docs/sources/document-updated/document-updated.mjs (5)
1-5: LGTM!The import statements are correctly used to bring in the required dependencies. The imported constants are used later in the code to specify the types of updates to listen for.
7-14: LGTM!The exported object correctly extends the common base module and defines the necessary properties to describe the source module.
15-29: LGTM!The
methodsproperty correctly extends the methods from the common base module. ThegetUpdateTypesandgenerateMetamethods are properly implemented to specify the update types and generate metadata for emitted events.
30-49: LGTM!The
processChangesmethod correctly processes the list of changed files. The filtering, checking, and retrieval of necessary information are properly implemented. The emitting of events with document data and metadata is correctly done.
50-51: LGTM!The closing braces are correctly placed to end the
methodsproperty and the exported object.components/google_docs/actions/create-document/create-document.mjs (5)
6-7: LGTM!The updated description provides better clarity on the action's purpose, and the version increment reflects the significant changes made.
16-22: LGTM!The addition of the optional
textproperty is a valuable enhancement, allowing users to insert content into the document upon creation. Making it optional ensures flexibility for different use cases.
23-29: LGTM!The addition of the optional
folderIdproperty is a great feature, enabling users to organize the newly created document within a specific folder in Google Drive. Making it optional ensures flexibility for different use cases.
35-40: LGTM!The added logic for handling the optional
textproperty is implemented correctly. It checks for the presence of thetextvalue and inserts it into the document using the appropriateinsertTextmethod.
42-53: LGTM!The added logic for handling the optional
folderIdproperty is implemented correctly. It checks for the presence of thefolderIdvalue, retrieves the document's current file information, and moves the document to the specified folder by updating its parents using the appropriateupdateFilemethod.components/google_docs/sources/common/base.mjs (8)
12-20: LGTM!The
foldersproperty is well-defined with a clear description and optional behavior. The use ofpropDefinitionarray andoptionalflag is correct.
32-34: LGTM!The
getDriveIdmethod implementation looks good. It correctly uses thegetDriveIdmethod from thegoogleDriveobject and the constant valueMY_DRIVE_VALUEfor consistency and maintainability.
35-40: LGTM!The
shouldProcessmethod implementation looks good. It correctly filters files to ensure only Google Docs are processed by checking the mimeType and calling theshouldProcessmethod from thenewFilesInstantobject with the correctthiscontext.
41-47: LGTM!The
getDocumentsFromFolderOptsmethod implementation looks good. It correctly constructs query options for retrieving documents from specified folders by including thefolderId, mimeType filter for Google Docs, and a condition to exclude trashed documents.
48-56: LGTM!The
getDocumentsFromFilesmethod implementation looks good. It correctly retrieves document details from the provided files usingreduceandawait, ensuring the number of documents does not exceed the specified limit.
57-72: LGTM!The
getDocumentsmethod implementation looks good. It correctly orchestrates the retrieval of documents by handling both specified folders and the root folder. The method uses thegetDocumentsFromFolderOptsandgoogleDrive.listFilesInPagemethods to retrieve documents and accumulates the results before returning them.
73-81: LGTM!The
emitFilesmethod implementation looks good. It correctly processes the provided files by iterating over each file, checking if it should be processed using theshouldProcessmethod, retrieving the document usinggoogleDrive.getDocument, and emitting the document along with its metadata usingthis.$emitandthis.generateMeta.
79-79: Verify the existence and correctness of thegenerateMetamethod.The
generateMetamethod is called in theemitFilesmethod, but its implementation is not provided in the code. It is likely that the method is defined in thenewFilesInstantobject and is being reused here.Please ensure that the
generateMetamethod exists in thenewFilesInstantobject and that it generates the correct metadata for the emitted document.components/google_docs/google_docs.app.mjs (3)
12-13: LGTM!The updated description and the addition of the
useQueryflag improve the usability and user experience of the document selection process.
15-18: LGTM!The changes to the
optionsmethod enable filtering the document listing based on the user's search query, enhancing the functionality and user experience.
132-136: LGTM!The modifications to the
listDocsOptionsmethod enable filtering documents by name based on the user's search query, improving the search functionality and user experience.
| export default { | ||
| ...common, | ||
| key: "google_docs-new-document-created", | ||
| name: "New Document Created (Instant)", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should these sources be labeled as instant? Aren't they timer-based?
Also, can we include docs links in the descriptions?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- These sources are subscription based. They inherit from Google Drive, like I mentioned in the gsheet. new-files-instant. There is a timer though to renew the subscription.
- Added doc links!
|
/approve |
Resolves #13912
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores