-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 178
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(robot-server): append error to analysis error list in case an internal error occurred #14510
fix(robot-server): append error to analysis error list in case an internal error occurred #14510
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## chore_release-7.2.0 #14510 +/- ##
====================================================
Coverage 67.76% 67.76%
====================================================
Files 2517 2517
Lines 72054 72054
Branches 9276 9276
====================================================
Hits 48828 48828
Misses 21008 21008
Partials 2218 2218
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, just a few small suggestions. Thank you!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me, couple tiny fixes maybe
504d1b8
to
ce66749
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like there was some rebasing mixup? Should rebase on top of chore_release-7.2.0
.
240f196
to
2c6489f
Compare
progress update on fail added completed_with_error to update signature added tests and fixed linting fixed linting added EnumeratedError to errors list and removed completed_with_error create an ErrorOccurence from the internal error monkeypatching not going so well progress with mocking. still not complete fixed mocking!need fo figure out datetime failing fixed bug with datetime compare remove unnecessary test reverted changes and restructured removed print reverted changes Update robot-server/robot_server/protocols/protocol_analyzer.py Co-authored-by: Seth Foster <[email protected]> pr fixes
2c6489f
to
832b783
Compare
# Overview Add protocols pulled from v7.2.0 pull requests for Analysis Snapshot testing. All work filed under [RQA-2434](https://opentrons.atlassian.net/browse/RQA-2434) # Test Plan - [x] Add partial tip pickup protocols from Sanitti - [x] Add ABR protocol from [RABR-23](https://opentrons.atlassian.net/browse/RABR-23) - [x] Run new protocols locally and verify results - [x] Run in workflow dispatch action and verify success [[link]](https://github.com/Opentrons/opentrons/actions/runs/8160792870/job/22308167177) # Changelog Here are the protocols added and where I found them: - [RQA-2098](https://opentrons.atlassian.net/browse/RQA-2098) - Flex_P1000_96_Gripper_TC_TM_HS_AnalysisError_GripperCollisionWithTips.json - #14491 - Flex_None_None_TC_2_14_verifyThermocyclerLoadedSlots.py - Flex_None_None_TC_2_15_verifyThermocyclerLoadedSlots.py - Flex_None_None_TC_2_16_verifyThermocyclerLoadedSlots.py - Flex_None_None_TC_2_17_verifyThermocyclerLoadedSlots.py - OT2_None_None_TC_2_14_VerifyThermocyclerLoadedSlots.py - OT2_None_None_TC_2_15_VerifyThermocyclerLoadedSlots.py - OT2_None_None_TC_2_16_VerifyThermocyclerLoadedSlots.py - OT2_None_None_TC_2_17_VerifyThermocyclerLoadedSlots.py - #14475 - Flex_None_None_TC_2_16_AnalysisError_TrashBinAndThermocyclerConflict.py - OT2_None_None_2_16_verifyDoesNotDeadlock.py - OT2_None_None_HS_2_16_AnalysisError_HeaterShakerConflictWithTrashBin1.py - OT2_None_None_HS_2_16_AnalysisError_HeaterShakerConflictWithTrashBin2.py - #14547 - Flex_P1000_96_None_TC_2_16_AnalysisError_pipetteCollisionWithThermocyclerLid.py - #14522 - Flex_P1000_96_None_TC_2_16_AnalysisError_pipetteCollisionWithThermocyclerLidClips.py - Dispense functionality validation - OT2_P300M_P20S_TC_HS_TM_2_15_dispense_changes.py - OT2_P300M_P20S_TC_HS_TM_2_16_dispense_changes.py - OT2_P300M_P20S_TC_HS_TM_2_17_dispense_changes.py - #14253 - OT2_P300S_None_2_16_verifyNoFloatingPointErrorInPipetting.py # Review requests There are a few pull requests that I had questions about. I will @ the people that worked on them to answer the questions - #14437 - @sfoster1, Can I use the protocol found in [RABR-23](https://opentrons.atlassian.net/browse/RABR-23) to get this to happen? Is there another way? - #14509 - @SyntaxColoring, can analysis capture this change or is this only relavant during actual protocol runtime? - #14510 - @TamarZanzouri or @SyntaxColoring, can I raise a generic python exception inside the protocol to trigger this functionality? - #14512 - @Laura-Danielle or @SyntaxColoring, Iant to validate my logic. This not a good canidate for snapshot testing because you have to run LPC and Calibration which is not taken into account during analysis. Can you confirm? # Risk assessment None [RQA-2434]: https://opentrons.atlassian.net/browse/RQA-2434?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ [RQA-2098]: https://opentrons.atlassian.net/browse/RQA-2098?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ [RABR-23]: https://opentrons.atlassian.net/browse/RABR-23?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ
Add protocols pulled from v7.2.0 pull requests for Analysis Snapshot testing. All work filed under [RQA-2434](https://opentrons.atlassian.net/browse/RQA-2434) - [x] Add partial tip pickup protocols from Sanitti - [x] Add ABR protocol from [RABR-23](https://opentrons.atlassian.net/browse/RABR-23) - [x] Run new protocols locally and verify results - [x] Run in workflow dispatch action and verify success [[link]](https://github.com/Opentrons/opentrons/actions/runs/8160792870/job/22308167177) Here are the protocols added and where I found them: - [RQA-2098](https://opentrons.atlassian.net/browse/RQA-2098) - Flex_P1000_96_Gripper_TC_TM_HS_AnalysisError_GripperCollisionWithTips.json - #14491 - Flex_None_None_TC_2_14_verifyThermocyclerLoadedSlots.py - Flex_None_None_TC_2_15_verifyThermocyclerLoadedSlots.py - Flex_None_None_TC_2_16_verifyThermocyclerLoadedSlots.py - Flex_None_None_TC_2_17_verifyThermocyclerLoadedSlots.py - OT2_None_None_TC_2_14_VerifyThermocyclerLoadedSlots.py - OT2_None_None_TC_2_15_VerifyThermocyclerLoadedSlots.py - OT2_None_None_TC_2_16_VerifyThermocyclerLoadedSlots.py - OT2_None_None_TC_2_17_VerifyThermocyclerLoadedSlots.py - #14475 - Flex_None_None_TC_2_16_AnalysisError_TrashBinAndThermocyclerConflict.py - OT2_None_None_2_16_verifyDoesNotDeadlock.py - OT2_None_None_HS_2_16_AnalysisError_HeaterShakerConflictWithTrashBin1.py - OT2_None_None_HS_2_16_AnalysisError_HeaterShakerConflictWithTrashBin2.py - #14547 - Flex_P1000_96_None_TC_2_16_AnalysisError_pipetteCollisionWithThermocyclerLid.py - #14522 - Flex_P1000_96_None_TC_2_16_AnalysisError_pipetteCollisionWithThermocyclerLidClips.py - Dispense functionality validation - OT2_P300M_P20S_TC_HS_TM_2_15_dispense_changes.py - OT2_P300M_P20S_TC_HS_TM_2_16_dispense_changes.py - OT2_P300M_P20S_TC_HS_TM_2_17_dispense_changes.py - #14253 - OT2_P300S_None_2_16_verifyNoFloatingPointErrorInPipetting.py There are a few pull requests that I had questions about. I will @ the people that worked on them to answer the questions - #14437 - @sfoster1, Can I use the protocol found in [RABR-23](https://opentrons.atlassian.net/browse/RABR-23) to get this to happen? Is there another way? - #14509 - @SyntaxColoring, can analysis capture this change or is this only relavant during actual protocol runtime? - #14510 - @TamarZanzouri or @SyntaxColoring, can I raise a generic python exception inside the protocol to trigger this functionality? - #14512 - @Laura-Danielle or @SyntaxColoring, Iant to validate my logic. This not a good canidate for snapshot testing because you have to run LPC and Calibration which is not taken into account during analysis. Can you confirm? None [RQA-2434]: https://opentrons.atlassian.net/browse/RQA-2434?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ [RQA-2098]: https://opentrons.atlassian.net/browse/RQA-2098?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ [RABR-23]: https://opentrons.atlassian.net/browse/RABR-23?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ
Add protocols pulled from v7.2.0 pull requests for Analysis Snapshot testing. All work filed under [RQA-2434](https://opentrons.atlassian.net/browse/RQA-2434) - [x] Add partial tip pickup protocols from Sanitti - [x] Add ABR protocol from [RABR-23](https://opentrons.atlassian.net/browse/RABR-23) - [x] Run new protocols locally and verify results - [x] Run in workflow dispatch action and verify success [[link]](https://github.com/Opentrons/opentrons/actions/runs/8160792870/job/22308167177) Here are the protocols added and where I found them: - [RQA-2098](https://opentrons.atlassian.net/browse/RQA-2098) - Flex_P1000_96_Gripper_TC_TM_HS_AnalysisError_GripperCollisionWithTips.json - #14491 - Flex_None_None_TC_2_14_verifyThermocyclerLoadedSlots.py - Flex_None_None_TC_2_15_verifyThermocyclerLoadedSlots.py - Flex_None_None_TC_2_16_verifyThermocyclerLoadedSlots.py - Flex_None_None_TC_2_17_verifyThermocyclerLoadedSlots.py - OT2_None_None_TC_2_14_VerifyThermocyclerLoadedSlots.py - OT2_None_None_TC_2_15_VerifyThermocyclerLoadedSlots.py - OT2_None_None_TC_2_16_VerifyThermocyclerLoadedSlots.py - OT2_None_None_TC_2_17_VerifyThermocyclerLoadedSlots.py - #14475 - Flex_None_None_TC_2_16_AnalysisError_TrashBinAndThermocyclerConflict.py - OT2_None_None_2_16_verifyDoesNotDeadlock.py - OT2_None_None_HS_2_16_AnalysisError_HeaterShakerConflictWithTrashBin1.py - OT2_None_None_HS_2_16_AnalysisError_HeaterShakerConflictWithTrashBin2.py - #14547 - Flex_P1000_96_None_TC_2_16_AnalysisError_pipetteCollisionWithThermocyclerLid.py - #14522 - Flex_P1000_96_None_TC_2_16_AnalysisError_pipetteCollisionWithThermocyclerLidClips.py - Dispense functionality validation - OT2_P300M_P20S_TC_HS_TM_2_15_dispense_changes.py - OT2_P300M_P20S_TC_HS_TM_2_16_dispense_changes.py - OT2_P300M_P20S_TC_HS_TM_2_17_dispense_changes.py - #14253 - OT2_P300S_None_2_16_verifyNoFloatingPointErrorInPipetting.py There are a few pull requests that I had questions about. I will @ the people that worked on them to answer the questions - #14437 - @sfoster1, Can I use the protocol found in [RABR-23](https://opentrons.atlassian.net/browse/RABR-23) to get this to happen? Is there another way? - #14509 - @SyntaxColoring, can analysis capture this change or is this only relavant during actual protocol runtime? - #14510 - @TamarZanzouri or @SyntaxColoring, can I raise a generic python exception inside the protocol to trigger this functionality? - #14512 - @Laura-Danielle or @SyntaxColoring, Iant to validate my logic. This not a good canidate for snapshot testing because you have to run LPC and Calibration which is not taken into account during analysis. Can you confirm? None [RQA-2434]: https://opentrons.atlassian.net/browse/RQA-2434?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ [RQA-2098]: https://opentrons.atlassian.net/browse/RQA-2098?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ [RABR-23]: https://opentrons.atlassian.net/browse/RABR-23?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ
Overview
closes RSS-169.
append internal error to analysis errors list in case a un expected error occured.
Test Plan
Tested this by adding a raise in the
runner.run
method. made sure that the analysis is not stuck in a pending state.Can do the same test on a robot.
Make sure analysis completed with "NOT_OK" result and that the error appears.
Changelog
analyze
.Risk assessment
low.