-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 178
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs(api): edit docstring for configure_nozzle_layout
#13997
docs(api): edit docstring for configure_nozzle_layout
#13997
Conversation
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## chore_release-7.1.0 #13997 +/- ##
====================================================
Coverage 70.46% 70.46%
====================================================
Files 2512 2512
Lines 71202 71202
Branches 8965 8965
====================================================
Hits 50169 50169
Misses 18841 18841
Partials 2192 2192
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Very good catch, thank you!
Fact check is correct, description is correct, merge conflicts are now fixed |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Few small comments but overall looks good to me!
``"A1"`` to have the pipette use its leftmost nozzles to pick up tips | ||
*left-to-right* from a tip rack. Use ``"A12"`` to have the pipette use its | ||
rightmost nozzles to pick up tips *right-to-left* from a tip rack. | ||
:type start: str or ``None`` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we're missing the tip_racks
parameter in this list? Unless the diff is being weird.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh yeah, because it just got merged an hour ago! 😅 I will get the stub that @sanni-t wrote back in, and follow up with her on anything more we want to say about it or the new active_channels
property.
Overview
Update the docstring for
configure_nozzle_layout
, first added in #13838. Goals for this PR:Test Plan
Reference entry in sandbox
Changelog
front_right
parameterReview requests
Make sure I've characterized features properly. I haven't been able to simulate protocols using this function yet, much less test them on hardware.
Fact check this claim:
If you try to perform partial tip pickup on a tip rack that is in an adapter, the API will raise an error.
Check that I didn't mess anything up when rebasing and resolving conflicts.
Risk assessment
low, docstrings + a comment hanging off the bottom of the docstring (can't comment within the string)