Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NMS-15663: spring security backport #6393

Merged

Conversation

RangerRick
Copy link
Contributor

@RangerRick RangerRick commented Jul 18, 2023

This PR is almost entirely different from how I went about this last time.

The biggest change is that I created new "servicemix" jars with proper OSGi metadata, which made things quite a bit less weird as far as handling startup safely.

I will also make a foundation-2023 version of this before merging, to make sure nothing goes strange moving forward to a newer Karaf.

Fixes:

External References

@RangerRick RangerRick changed the title NMS-15663: spring security backport smoke NMS-15663: spring security backport Jul 18, 2023
This reverts commit 76dca7a.

Fixes:
  * CVE-2022-22976: BCrypt skips salt rounds for work factor of 31
  * CVE-2022-22978: Authorization Bypass in RegexRequestMatcher
@RangerRick RangerRick force-pushed the jira/NMS-15663-spring-security-backport-smoke branch from e18cb22 to 6f05921 Compare July 18, 2023 19:04
@RangerRick
Copy link
Contributor Author

I will also make a foundation-2023 version of this before merging, to make sure nothing goes strange moving forward to a newer Karaf.

It passed!

Copy link
Contributor

@christianpape christianpape left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@RangerRick RangerRick merged commit 06af3ec into foundation-2020 Jul 19, 2023
3 checks passed
@RangerRick RangerRick deleted the jira/NMS-15663-spring-security-backport-smoke branch July 19, 2023 14:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants