Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

nixos/security.cyber-toolnix: add module #345300

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

D3vil0p3r
Copy link
Member

This module is used to install pentesting tools based on the chosen role. Options are:

  • blue (Blue Teamer),
  • bugbounty (Bug Bounty Hunter),
  • cracker (Cracker Specialist),
  • dos (DoS Tester),
  • forensic (Forensic Specialist),
  • malware (Malware Analyst),
  • mobile (Mobile Specialist),
  • network (Network Specialist),
  • osint (OSINT Specialist),
  • red (Red Teamer),
  • student (Student),
  • web (Web Pentester)

Description of changes

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

This module is used to install pentesting tools based on the chosen role. Options are:
* `blue` (Blue Teamer),
* `bugbounty` (Bug Bounty Hunter),
* `cracker` (Cracker Specialist),
* `dos` (DoS Tester),
* `forensic` (Forensic Specialist),
* `malware` (Malware Analyst),
* `mobile` (Mobile Specialist),
* `network` (Network Specialist),
* `osint` (OSINT Specialist),
* `red` (Red Teamer),
* `student` (Student),
* `web` (Web Pentester)
@bcdarwin
Copy link
Member

Is there any precedent for using nixos modules for what is essentially a package collection (similar to what Debian calls a 'metapackage')? (Versus, say, a standalone repo/flake which just provides the attrset of package lists supplied by this module?)

@Letgamer
Copy link

I would propose to deny this pull request, I am not familiar with the governance and RFC's in Nix, but apparently Meta-Packages are not official features Discourse and would add another layer of complexity/maintaining to the repository.
This is not the place to discuss the edition of such a big feature.
Maybe you would be so kind to share your opinion SuperSandro2000

@D3vil0p3r
Copy link
Member Author

How manage "metapackages"-like?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants