Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: bump keyring-api and eth-snap-keyring #25287

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 13, 2024

Conversation

montelaidev
Copy link
Contributor

@montelaidev montelaidev commented Jun 13, 2024

Description

This PR bumps @metamask/keyring-api to ^8.0.0 and @metamask/eth-snap-keyring to ^4.3.1

Related issues

Fixes:

Manual testing steps

Not applicable

Screenshots/Recordings

Not applicable

Pre-merge author checklist

Pre-merge reviewer checklist

  • I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed).
  • I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.

@montelaidev montelaidev self-assigned this Jun 13, 2024
@montelaidev montelaidev requested a review from a team as a code owner June 13, 2024 07:31
Copy link
Contributor

CLA Signature Action: All authors have signed the CLA. You may need to manually re-run the blocking PR check if it doesn't pass in a few minutes.

Copy link

socket-security bot commented Jun 13, 2024

New and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Package New capabilities Transitives Size Publisher
npm/@metamask/[email protected] None 0 0 B
npm/@metamask/[email protected] None +5 326 kB

🚮 Removed packages: npm/@metamask/[email protected]

View full report↗︎

@montelaidev
Copy link
Contributor Author

@metamaskbot update-policies

@metamaskbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Policies updated

@metamaskbot metamaskbot requested review from a team as code owners June 13, 2024 08:44
@metamaskbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Builds ready [8bee890]
Page Load Metrics (292 ± 343 ms)
PlatformPageMetricMin (ms)Max (ms)Average (ms)StandardDeviation (ms)MarginOfError (ms)
ChromeHomefirstPaint61169942914
domContentLoaded8241352
load402615292714343
domInteractive8241352
Bundle size diffs [🚨 Warning! Bundle size has increased!]
  • background: 72.41 KiB (2.17%)
  • ui: 0 Bytes (0.00%)
  • common: 192 Bytes (0.00%)

@metamaskbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Builds ready [f503284]
Page Load Metrics (51 ± 4 ms)
PlatformPageMetricMin (ms)Max (ms)Average (ms)StandardDeviation (ms)MarginOfError (ms)
ChromeHomefirstPaint72998484
domContentLoaded8231131
load40735184
domInteractive8231131
Bundle size diffs [🚨 Warning! Bundle size has increased!]
  • background: 72.41 KiB (2.17%)
  • ui: 0 Bytes (0.00%)
  • common: 192 Bytes (0.00%)

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 13, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 65.62%. Comparing base (453b2b5) to head (f503284).
Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop   #25287   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    65.62%   65.62%           
========================================
  Files         1373     1373           
  Lines        54532    54532           
  Branches     14285    14285           
========================================
  Hits         35783    35783           
  Misses       18749    18749           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@ccharly ccharly left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

Also, we could have avoid the policy changes (or part of them at least) if we had bump the accounts-controller at the same time.

I know it is coming in another PR here: #25291

This PR will probably undo the policy changes we made here, so that's ok

Copy link
Member

@gantunesr gantunesr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Will this PR need manual QA @montelaidev?

@montelaidev
Copy link
Contributor Author

LGTM. Will this PR need manual QA @montelaidev?

Checked with @ccharly we shouldn't need qa for this.

@montelaidev montelaidev merged commit 54823b9 into develop Jun 13, 2024
74 checks passed
@montelaidev montelaidev deleted the bump/keyring-api-and-eth-snap-keyring-13-06-2024 branch June 13, 2024 15:41
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 13, 2024
@metamaskbot metamaskbot added the release-12.1.0 Issue or pull request that will be included in release 12.1.0 label Jun 13, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
release-12.1.0 Issue or pull request that will be included in release 12.1.0 team-accounts
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants