WIP: Fixing Julia tests #508
Conversation
seems to make no significant difference. So is this the correct handling for a thunk?
```
newframe = Frame(moduleof(frame), code)
if isa(recurse, Compiled)
JuliaInterpreter.finish!(recurse, newframe, true)
else
newframe.caller = frame
frame.callee = newframe
ret = limited_exec!(recurse, newframe, refnstmts, istoplevel)
isa(ret, Aborted) && return ret, refnstmts[]
frame.callee = nothing
end
```
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #508 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 82.76% 83.65% +0.89%
==========================================
Files 12 12
Lines 2443 2405 -38
==========================================
- Hits 2022 2012 -10
+ Misses 421 393 -28
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
|
These are the tests which seem to be most time consuming or not terminating: |
|
Nice to see this getting worked on again! |
|
The current critical problem with |
... and reasonable results without aborting
I'm not sure how to proceed with this patch. In its original form it intended to make the tests runnable on Windows (BTW, is the repository version working on other platforms?). I'd be willing to revert it to this initial form in order to keep the changes small and establish a baseline for further improvements regarding #13. Is this the way to go? |
This commit contains the changes needed to make the tests running locally against the installed Julia tests.