This repository has been archived by the owner on May 6, 2024. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
feat: ✨ add new OutlineDevice API that uses Outline SDK #118
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
feat: ✨ add new OutlineDevice API that uses Outline SDK #118
Changes from all commits
63aae04
be55019
82b552e
804dc85
cc44584
dc5e4a6
3a9ff6a
393260e
0df72e5
3c9a2c8
c693adb
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you define a
legacyConfigFromFlags()
, and pass the config as a parameter?Making the config explicit in the function call will make the call more understandable.
Let's use "start tunnel" to be analogous to the new code.
I'm imagining
startLegacyShadowsocksTunnel(legacyConfigFromClient)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Move this back out. The connectivity test and the tunnel flows are separate. We need to clearly run one or the other like we had before.
Also, don't we need a check connectivity with json config, for the udp update?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We don't need any connectivity test for the new json config tunnel. I'd rather expose a public
OutlineTunnel.IsUDPSupported()
method so the caller can retrieve that info.