Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding classVar and remove quiet_mode #6168

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

RNF24
Copy link

@RNF24 RNF24 commented Aug 5, 2024

PR fulfills these requirements

  • Commit message(s) and PR title follows the format [fix|feat|ci|chore|doc]: TICKET-ID: Short description of change made ex. fix: DEV-XXXX: Removed inconsistent code usage causing intermittent errors
  • Tests for the changes have been added/updated (for bug fixes/features)
  • Docs have been added/updated (for bug fixes/features)
  • Best efforts were made to ensure docs/code are concise and coherent (checked for spelling/grammatical errors, commented out code, debug logs etc.)
  • Self-reviewed and ran all changes on a local instance (for bug fixes/features)

Change has impacts in these area(s)

(check all that apply)

  • Product design
  • Backend (Database)
  • Backend (API)
  • Frontend

Describe the reason for change

(link to issue, supportive screenshots etc.)

What does this fix?

(if this is a bug fix)

What is the new behavior?

(if this is a breaking or feature change)

What is the current behavior?

(if this is a breaking or feature change)

What libraries were added/updated?

(list all with version changes)

Does this change affect performance?

(if so describe the impacts positive or negative)

Does this change affect security?

(if so describe the impacts positive or negative)

What alternative approaches were there?

(briefly list any if applicable)

What feature flags were used to cover this change?

(briefly list any if applicable)

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

(check only one)

  • Yes, and covered entirely by feature flag(s)
  • Yes, and covered partially by feature flag(s)
  • No
  • Not sure (briefly explain the situation below)

What level of testing was included in the change?

(check all that apply)

  • e2e
  • integration
  • unit

Which logical domain(s) does this change affect?

(for bug fixes/features, be as precise as possible. ex. Authentication, Annotation History, Review Stream etc.)

Copy link

netlify bot commented Aug 5, 2024

👷 Deploy request for label-studio-docs-new-theme pending review.

Visit the deploys page to approve it

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit c61b54b

Copy link

netlify bot commented Aug 5, 2024

👷 Deploy request for heartex-docs pending review.

Visit the deploys page to approve it

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit c61b54b

Copy link

sentry-io bot commented Aug 5, 2024

🔍 Existing Issues For Review

Your pull request is modifying functions with the following pre-existing issues:

📄 File: label_studio/server.py

Function Unhandled Issue
_create_user EOFError: EOF when reading a line label_studio.se...
Event Count: 1

Did you find this useful? React with a 👍 or 👎

@robot-ci-heartex
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR is stale because it has been open 45 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 10 days.

@robot-ci-heartex
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR was closed because it has been stalled for 10 days with no activity.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants