Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Blog: Arize comparison - added keywords #2624

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Blog: Arize comparison - added keywords #2624

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
71 changes: 54 additions & 17 deletions bifrost/app/blog/blogs/best-arize-alternatives/src.mdx
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
![Arize AI vs. Helicone, which one is better?](/static/blog/arize-alternatives/helicone-vs-arize.webp)

### Introduction
As the adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) continues to grow, the demand for robust observability tools has become paramount. These tools help developers and data scientists monitor, analyze, and optimize their LLM applications.

As the adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) continues to grow, the need for robust observability tools has become paramount. These tools help developers and data scientists monitor, analyze, and optimize their LLM applications. In this comparison, we'll explore two leading platforms in the LLM observability space: Helicone and Arize Phoenix. Both offer unique features and capabilities, but choosing the right tool can significantly impact your AI development workflow.
In this comparison, we'll delve into two leading LLM monitoring tools: **Helicone** and **Arize Phoenix**. Both offer unique features and capabilities, but selecting the right tool can significantly impact your AI development workflow and model performance.

### Overview: Helicone vs. Arize Phoenix

Expand All @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ As the adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) continues to grow, the need for

### Use Case Scenarios

Different tools excel in different scenarios. Here's a quick guide to help you choose the right tool for your specific needs:
Different tools excel in different scenarios. Here's a quick guide to help you choose the right LLM observability platform for your needs:

1. **Small Startup with Limited Budget**

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -74,10 +74,17 @@ Helicone is a comprehensive LLM observability platform designed for developers o
4. **User Tracking** - Gain insights into user interactions and behaviors within your LLM-powered applications.
5. **Cost Analysis** - Monitor and optimize your LLM usage costs with detailed analytics.

## How does Helicone compare to Arize Phoenix?
## How Does Helicone Compare to Arize Phoenix?

While both tools offer strong observability features, Helicone stands out with its user-friendly approach and comprehensive feature set. Unlike Arize Phoenix, Helicone provides self-hosting options, user tracking, and user feedback collection. Its flexible pricing model and free tier make it more accessible for smaller teams and individual developers.

## Why Companies Are Choosing Helicone Over Arize Phoenix?

* **Open-Source** and **Customizable**: Modify and extend the platform to suit your specific needs.
* **Scalability**: Capable of handling high-volume LLM usage without performance degradation.
* **Cost-Effective**: Flexible pricing with a generous free tier.
* **Comprehensive Analytics**: Deep insights into performance, costs, and user behavior.

---

# **2. Arize Phoenix**
Expand All @@ -100,31 +107,61 @@ Arize Phoenix is an open-source LLM observability tool that focuses on providing

Arize Phoenix excels in its evaluation capabilities and is well-suited for data scientists and ML engineers working on complex LLM projects. However, it lacks some of the developer-friendly features that Helicone offers, such as self-hosting options, user tracking, and user feedback collection. Arize Phoenix's pricing model may also be less flexible compared to Helicone's tiered approach.

## Why Companies Choose Arize Phoenix Over Helicone?

- **Robust Evaluation Capabilities**: Ideal for data scientists focused on model performance.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have evals too!

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

but is it the same type of eval as we do?

https://docs.arize.com/phoenix/evaluation/llm-evals

- **Integration with ML Workflows**: Seamlessly fits into existing machine learning pipelines.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe just keep this one


---

### So, which LLM observability tool suits you better?
## So, which LLM observability tool suits you better?

Both Helicone and Arize Phoenix offer powerful features for LLM observability, but they cater to slightly different audiences.

### Choose Helicone if you:
* Require self-hosting options for data control and compliance.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, we also have SOC2, the ability to omit storing bodies

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what do you suggest here?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If they're concerned about control and compliance, Helicone has SOC2, the ability to omit storing bodies and self-hosting options

* Prefer **developer-friendly** tools with easy integration.
* Need features like **user tracking, feedback collection, and image support.**
* Are looking for a **cost-effective** solution with flexible pricing.
* Want an all-in-one solution that scales with your needs.

Both Helicone and Arize Phoenix offer powerful features for LLM observability, but they cater to slightly different audiences. Helicone's user-friendly approach, comprehensive feature set, and flexible pricing make it an excellent choice for a wide range of users, from solo developers to small and medium-sized teams. Its self-hosting options and advanced features like user tracking and feedback collection give it an edge in many scenarios.
### Choose Arize Phoenix if you:
* Are a data scientist or ML engineer focused on model evaluation.
* Need advanced tools for assessing LLM performance.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, we have evals too!

* Don't require self-hosting or user tracking features.
* Are integrating into existing complex ML workflows.

Arize Phoenix, on the other hand, shines in its evaluation capabilities and may be preferred by data scientists and ML engineers working on complex LLM projects. However, its lack of self-hosting options and more specialized focus might make it less suitable for smaller teams or individual developers.

Ultimately, the choice between Helicone and Arize Phoenix depends on your specific needs, team size, and the complexity of your LLM applications. For most users, especially those looking for an all-in-one solution with a gentle learning curve, Helicone appears to be the more versatile and accessible option.
**For most users**, especially those looking for an all-in-one solution with a gentle learning curve and features like self-hosting, user tracking, and flexible pricing, **[Helicone](https://www.helicone.ai/)** is the more versatile and accessible option.

**For data scientists and ML engineers** working on complex LLM projects who require advanced evaluation capabilities and integration into existing ML workflows, **[Arize Phoenix](https://phoenix.arize.com/)** is preferable.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same here with evals. we do that too!


---

### Frequently Asked Questions
## Frequently Asked Questions

### Q: What is the main difference between Helicone and Arize Phoenix?
A: The main difference lies in their target audience and feature set. Helicone is more developer-friendly with features like self-hosting and user tracking, while Arize Phoenix focuses on robust evaluation tools for data scientists and ML engineers but lacks some developer-centric features.

1. **Q: What is the main difference between Helicone and Arize Phoenix?**
A: The main difference lies in their target audience and feature set. Helicone is more developer-friendly with features like self-hosting and user tracking, while Arize Phoenix focuses on robust evaluation tools for data scientists and ML engineers.
### Q: Which tool is best for beginners?
A: Helicone is generally more beginner-friendly due to its one-line integration and comprehensive documentation. Its user-friendly interface makes it accessible for developers of all skill levels.

2. **Q: Which tool is best for beginners?**
A: Helicone is generally more beginner-friendly due to its one-line integration and comprehensive documentation.

3. **Q: Can I switch easily between these tools?**
### Q: Can I switch easily between these tools?
A: While both tools offer integration options, switching may require some adjustments to your workflow. Helicone's one-line integration might make the transition easier in many cases.

4. **Q: Are there any free options available?**
A: Helicone offers a free tier, making it accessible for small projects or individual developers. Arize Phoenix is open-source, but its hosted solution may not have a free tier.
### Q: Are there any free options available?
A: Helicone offers a generous free tier, making it accessible for small projects or individual developers. Arize Phoenix is open-source, but its hosted solution may require contacting sales for pricing details.


5. **Q: How do these tools handle data privacy and security?**
### Q: How do these tools handle data privacy and security?
A: Both tools take data privacy seriously. Helicone offers self-hosting options for complete data control, while Arize Phoenix, being open-source, allows for scrutiny of its security practices. Always review the latest security features and compliance certifications when making your decision.

### Q: Do these tools support image data?
A: Helicone supports both text and image inputs/outputs without payload limitations, making it versatile for various LLM applications. Arize Phoenix does not offer image support.

### Q: Which tool offers better scalability?
A: Both tools are scalable, but Helicone offers advanced caching and is designed to handle high-volume LLM usage efficiently.

### Q: Is there support for user feedback collection?
A: Helicone provides features for collecting and analyzing user feedback, which can be invaluable for improving your LLM applications. Arize Phoenix does not offer this feature.
Loading