Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update infisical-secrets-check.yml #22

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 14, 2024
Merged

Update infisical-secrets-check.yml #22

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 14, 2024

Conversation

guibranco
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

korbit-ai bot commented Jul 14, 2024

My review is in progress 📖 - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

Copy link

👋 Hi there!

  1. Standardize tool installation method for better maintenance and readability.
  2. Enhance error handling and reporting logic for clarity and robustness.
  3. Ensure consistent formatting and proper file naming conventions for improved organization.

The description could be more helpful.


Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo.
Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at [email protected].

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 14, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@gstraccini[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 25 minutes and 58 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 263792e and 950905b.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

  1. /.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml
    • The condition syntax for the job Generate report is incorrect and will cause a syntax error. The if: failure() should be moved outside the shell key.
    • In the job Generate report, the script is dependent on the success of the previous step, but the condition should be if: success() instead of if: failure().
    • In the job Read secrets-result.md, the path should point to secrets-result.md instead of secrets-result.csv.
    • The second occurrence of the job Read secrets-result.log should be removed to avoid redundancy.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

  1. /.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml
    • Consider adding some error handling in the workflow steps to ensure that failures at any point are appropriately addressed.
    • Add comments to briefly describe the purpose of each job and step for better readability and maintenance.
    • Use consistent naming conventions for artifact names and paths in the upload artifacts steps.
    • Enclose the entire script block in the Generate report job within quotes to ensure the commands are executed correctly.
    • Utilize more descriptive artifact names to distinguish between different artifacts being uploaded.
    • Ensure clear and concise messaging in the comments and PR update to provide meaningful information to the users.

Copy link

@senior-dev-bot senior-dev-bot bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Feedback from Senior Dev Bot

Comment on lines 74 to 85
with:
path: secrets-result.log

- name: Read secrets-result.log
- name: Read secrets-result.md
uses: guibranco/[email protected]
if: failure()
id: report
with:
path: secrets-result.csv
path: secrets-result.md

- name: Update PR with comment
uses: mshick/add-pr-comment@v2

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CODE REVIEW

  1. The file extension changes from .log and .csv to .md should be consistent throughout the workflow. Great job maintaining that consistency across the changes.

  2. Consider renaming the variable path to something more descriptive, like file_path, for better readability.

Example:

      - name: Read secrets-result.md
        uses: guibranco/[email protected]
        if: failure()
        id: report
        with:
          file_path: secrets-result.md

Comment on lines 94 to 112
```
${{ steps.log.outputs.contents }}
```

message-failure: |
**Infisical secrets check:** :rotating_light: Secrets leaked!

**Scan results:**
```
${{ steps.log.outputs.contents }}
```
**Scan report:**
```
${{ steps.report.outputs.contents }}
```

<details>
<summary>🔎 Detected secrets in your GIT history</summary>

${{ steps.report.outputs.contents }}

</details>
message-cancelled: |
**Infisical secrets check:** :o: Secrets check cancelled!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CODE REVIEW

  1. Use consistent indentation for better readability.
  2. Ensure output under <details> uses proper code fencing for format consistency.

Refined code example:

message-failure: |
  **Infisical secrets check:** :rotating_light: Secrets leaked!     

  **Scan results:**

${{ steps.log.outputs.contents }}


<details>
<summary>🔎 Detected secrets in your GIT history</summary>

${{ steps.report.outputs.contents }}

</details>

message-cancelled: |
**Infisical secrets check:** :o: Secrets check cancelled!

Comment on lines 26 to 71
shell: bash
run: curl -1sLf 'https://dl.cloudsmith.io/public/infisical/infisical-cli/setup.deb.sh' | sudo -E bash

- name: Install Infisical
- name: Install tools
shell: bash
run: |
sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install -y infisical
pip install csvkit
npm install -g csv-to-markdown-table

- name: Run scan
shell: bash
run: infisical scan --redact -f csv -r secrets-result.csv 2>&1 | tee >(sed -r 's/\x1b\[[0-9;]*m//g' > secrets-result.log)
run: infisical scan --redact -f csv -r secrets-result-raw.csv 2>&1 | tee >(sed -r 's/\x1b\[[0-9;]*m//g' >secrets-result.log)

- name: Generate report
shell: bash
if: failure()
run: |
if [[ -s secrets-result-raw.csv ]]; then
csvformat -M $'\r' secrets-result-raw.csv | sed -e ':a' -e 'N;$!ba' -e 's/\n/\\n/g' | tr '\r' '\n' | head -n 11 >secrets-result.csv
csv-to-markdown-table --delim , --headers <secrets-result.csv >secrets-result.md
fi

- name: Upload artifacts secrets-result.log
uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
if: always()
with:
name: report-log
path: secrets-result.log

- name: Upload artifacts secrets-result.csv
uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
if: failure()
with:
name: report-csv
path: secrets-result.csv

- name: Upload artifacts secrets-result.md
uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
if: failure()
with:
name: report-md
path: secrets-result.md

- name: Read secrets-result.log
uses: guibranco/[email protected]

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CODE REVIEW

  1. Combine Install Steps: Efficiency is improved by combining software installs under a single apt-get install command.
  2. Failure Condition Logic: Simplify the failure condition.
  3. Consistency: Ensure consistent indentation and log formatting.

Outlined changes:

   - name: Install tools
     shell: bash
     run: |
       sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install -y infisical csvkit
       pip install csvkit
       npm install -g csv-to-markdown-table

   - name: Generate report
     shell: bash
     if: failure()
     run: |
       if [[ -s secrets-result-raw.csv ]]; then
         csvformat -M $'\r' secrets-result-raw.csv | sed -e ':a' -e 'N;$!ba' -e 's/\n/\\n/g' | tr '\r' '\n' | head -n 11 > secrets-result.csv
         csv-to-markdown-table --delim , --headers < secrets-result.csv > secrets-result.md
       fi

   - name: Upload artifacts secrets-result.csv
     uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
     if: failure()
     with:
       name: report-csv
       path: secrets-result.csv
       
   - name: Upload artifacts secrets-result.md
     uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
     if: failure()
     with:
       name: report-md
       path: secrets-result.md

These suggestions make the code more efficient and maintainable.

Copy link

gooroo-dev bot commented Jul 14, 2024

Please double-check what I found in the pull request:

🐞Mistake 🤪Typo 🚨Security 🚀Performance 💪Best Practices 📖Readability ❓Others
0 0 0 0 0 1 0

Summary of Proposed Changes

  • ➕ Added installation of csvkit and csv-to-markdown-table tools.
  • ➕ Added a step to generate a markdown report from the CSV scan results.
  • ➕ Added steps to upload artifacts (secrets-result.log, secrets-result.csv, secrets-result.md).
  • 📖 Improved readability by changing the PR comment format to use a collapsible details section for the scan report.

Identified Issues

ID Type Details Severity Confidence
1 📖Readability The Generate report step uses a complex command that could be simplified. 🟠Medium 🟠Medium

Issue 1: Complex Command in Generate report Step

Details: The Generate report step uses a complex command that combines multiple operations into a single line. This can be difficult to read and maintain.
File Path: .github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml
Lines: 32-36

Proposed Fix:

      - name: Generate report
        shell: bash
        if: failure()
        run: |
          if [[ -s secrets-result-raw.csv ]]; then
            csvformat -M $'\r' secrets-result-raw.csv > formatted.csv
            sed -e ':a' -e 'N;$!ba' -e 's/\n/\\n/g' formatted.csv | tr '\r' '\n' | head -n 11 > secrets-result.csv
            csv-to-markdown-table --delim , --headers < secrets-result.csv > secrets-result.md
          fi

Explanation: This fix breaks down the complex command into multiple steps, making it easier to read and understand.

General Review

The proposed changes are well-structured and add valuable functionality to the workflow. The addition of tools for CSV and markdown processing enhances the reporting capabilities. The readability of the PR comment is improved by using a collapsible details section. The only notable issue is the complexity of the command in the Generate report step, which can be simplified for better readability. Overall, the code quality is good, and the changes are beneficial.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev
React or reply to let me know your thoughts!

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jul 14, 2024

Copy link

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

8:16PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
8:16PM INF 34 commits scanned.
8:16PM INF scan completed in 72.9ms
8:16PM INF no leaks found

@guibranco guibranco enabled auto-merge (squash) July 14, 2024 20:17
@gstraccini gstraccini bot added the ☑️ auto-merge Auto-merge enabled by gstraccini-bot label Jul 14, 2024
@guibranco guibranco merged commit 7ed1701 into main Jul 14, 2024
11 of 12 checks passed
@guibranco guibranco deleted the guibranco-patch-1 branch July 14, 2024 20:17
Copy link

@korbit-ai korbit-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have reviewed your code and did not find any issues!


Please note that I can make mistakes, and you should still encourage your team to review your code as well.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
☑️ auto-merge Auto-merge enabled by gstraccini-bot size/M
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant