Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade rimraf from 6.0.0 to 6.0.1 #233

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 1, 2024

Conversation

guibranco
Copy link
Member

@guibranco guibranco commented Aug 1, 2024

User description

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade rimraf from 6.0.0 to 6.0.1.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 1 version ahead of your current version.

  • The recommended version was released on 21 days ago.

Release notes
Package name: rimraf from rimraf GitHub release notes

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:


Description

  • Upgraded rimraf dependency from version 6.0.0 to 6.0.1 to ensure the project uses the latest version.
  • This upgrade includes a new dependency package-json-from-dist.
  • Keeping dependencies up-to-date helps in fixing vulnerabilities and improving project stability.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Dependencies
package-lock.json
Upgrade rimraf dependency in package-lock.json                     

POCUploadStream/ClientApp/package-lock.json

  • Upgraded rimraf from version 6.0.0 to 6.0.1.
  • Updated the resolved URL and integrity hash for the new version.
  • Added package-json-from-dist as a new dependency.
  • +5/-4     
    package.json
    Update rimraf version in package.json                                       

    POCUploadStream/ClientApp/package.json

  • Updated rimraf version in dependencies from ^6.0.0 to ^6.0.1.
  • +1/-1     

    Description by Korbit AI

    Note

    This feature is in early access. You can enable or disable it in the Korbit Console.

    What change is being made?

    Upgrade the rimraf package from version 6.0.0 to 6.0.1 in package.json and package-lock.json.

    Why are these changes being made?

    This upgrade addresses minor bug fixes and improvements in the rimraf package. Ensuring dependencies are up-to-date helps maintain security and stability in the project.

    Summary by CodeRabbit

    • Chores
      • Updated the rimraf package to the latest patch version for improved performance and stability.

    Snyk has created this PR to upgrade rimraf from 6.0.0 to 6.0.1.
    
    See this package in npm:
    rimraf
    
    See this project in Snyk:
    https://app.snyk.io/org/guibranco/project/ef86983b-7361-4152-9f91-52cb7d4d1c37?utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&page=upgrade-pr
    Copy link

    semanticdiff-com bot commented Aug 1, 2024

    Review changes with SemanticDiff.

    Analyzed 2 of 2 files.

    Filename Status
    ✔️ POCUploadStream/ClientApp/package-lock.json 69.65% smaller
    ✔️ POCUploadStream/ClientApp/package.json Analyzed

    Copy link

    korbit-ai bot commented Aug 1, 2024

    My review is in progress 📖 - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

    Copy link

    coderabbitai bot commented Aug 1, 2024

    Walkthrough

    This update involves a minor version bump of the rimraf package from ^6.0.0 to ^6.0.1 in the POCUploadStream/ClientApp project. This change ensures that the project benefits from the latest bug fixes and improvements without introducing breaking changes. Overall, the package.json file remains unchanged aside from this dependency update.

    Changes

    File Change Summary
    POCUploadStream/ClientApp/package.json Updated rimraf from ^6.0.0 to ^6.0.1

    Poem

    In the garden, where code does bloom,
    A little change chased away the gloom.
    Rimraf's now fresh, it hops with glee,
    Fixes and tweaks, oh what a spree!
    With each little update, our project takes flight,
    A happy rabbit in the code's delight! 🐇✨


    Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

    Share
    Tips

    Chat

    There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

    • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
      • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
      • Generate unit testing code for this file.
      • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
    • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
      • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
    • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
      • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
      • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
      • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
      • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

    Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

    CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

    • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
    • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
    • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
    • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
    • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
    • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai help to get help.

    Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

    CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

    • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
    • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
    • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

    Documentation and Community

    • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
    • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
    • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

    Copy link

    pr-code-reviewer bot commented Aug 1, 2024

    👋 Hi there!

    Everything looks good!


    Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo.
    Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at [email protected].

    Copy link

    Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

    1. POCUploadStream/ClientApp/package-lock.json:
      • The change in the version of the "rimraf" package from "6.0.0" to "6.0.1" without thorough testing may introduce unforeseen issues or incompatibilities.

    Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

    1. POCUploadStream/ClientApp/package-lock.json:
      • When updating package versions, ensure to check for any breaking changes in dependencies and compatibility with other packages.
      • Consider updating the "requires" field with the correct version constraints if applicable to prevent dependency conflicts.
      • It's a good practice to run tests and verify compatibility after updating package versions to identify any regressions or issues early.
      • Regularly review package updates and changelogs to stay informed about changes that may affect the project.

    Copy link

    instapr bot commented Aug 1, 2024

    Feedback:

    • Update the rimraf package from 6.0.0 to 6.0.1.
    • Ensure changes won't impact the project.

    View latest project report


    Copy link

    senior-dev-bot bot commented Aug 1, 2024

    Hi there! 👋 Thanks for opening a PR. It looks like you've already reached the 5 review limit on our Basic Plan for the week. If you still want a review, feel free to upgrade your subscription in the Web App and then reopen the PR

    Copy link

    gooroo-dev bot commented Aug 1, 2024

    Please double check the following review of the pull request:

    Issues counts

    🐞Mistake 🤪Typo 🚨Security 🚀Performance 💪Best Practices 📖Readability ❓Others
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    Changes in the diff

    • ✅ Updated the version of rimraf from 6.0.0 to 6.0.1.
    • ➕ Added a new dependency package-json-from-dist with version ^1.0.0.
    • ✅ Updated the resolved URL and integrity hash for rimraf.

    Identified Issues

    ID Type Details Severity Confidence
    1 🚨Security The new version of rimraf (6.0.1) should be reviewed for vulnerabilities. 🟠Medium 🟡Low

    Issue 1

    Explanation

    The new version of rimraf (6.0.1) should be reviewed for vulnerabilities. While the update is minor, it is important to ensure that no new security issues have been introduced. This is particularly relevant given that rimraf is a widely used package for file system operations.

    Code to Address the Issue

    No specific code change is required, but it is recommended to run security audits using tools like npm audit or snyk to check for vulnerabilities in the updated package.

    Explanation of the Fix

    The fix involves performing a security audit on the updated package to ensure that it does not introduce any vulnerabilities. This is a best practice when updating dependencies.

    Missing Tests

    To ensure the functionality of the updated package, the following tests should be added:

    1. Test for rimraf functionality:

      • Verify that rimraf can successfully delete files and directories as expected.
      • Check edge cases, such as attempting to delete non-existent files or directories.
    2. Security Test:

      • Run a security audit on the project after the update to ensure that no vulnerabilities are present.
    3. Dependency Test:

      • Ensure that the new dependency package-json-from-dist is functioning correctly and does not interfere with existing functionality.

    By implementing these tests, we can ensure that the changes made in the pull request do not negatively impact the application.

    Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev
    React or reply to give your feedback!

    @guibranco guibranco enabled auto-merge (squash) August 1, 2024 03:19
    @gstraccini gstraccini bot added the ☑️ auto-merge Auto-merge enabled by gstraccini-bot label Aug 1, 2024
    @github-actions github-actions bot added the size/S label Aug 1, 2024
    @penify-dev penify-dev bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 1, 2024
    @penify-dev penify-dev bot changed the title [Snyk] Upgrade rimraf from 6.0.0 to 6.0.1 Upgrade rimraf from 6.0.0 to 6.0.1 Aug 1, 2024
    Copy link
    Contributor

    penify-dev bot commented Aug 1, 2024

    PR Review 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

    1, because this PR only updates the version of a dependency with no significant changes in the code.

    🧪 Relevant tests

    No

    ⚡ Possible issues

    No

    🔒 Security concerns

    No

    Copy link

    @korbit-ai korbit-ai bot left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    I have reviewed your code and did not find any issues!


    Please note that I can make mistakes, and you should still encourage your team to review your code as well.

    Copy link
    Contributor

    penify-dev bot commented Aug 1, 2024

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Security
    Verify and correct the integrity hash for the updated package version

    Ensure that the integrity hash for the new version of rimraf is correct and matches the
    expected value from the npm registry.

    POCUploadStream/ClientApp/package-lock.json [72]

    -"integrity": "sha512-9dkvaxAsk/xNXSJzMgFqqMCuFgt2+KsOFek3TMLfo8NCPfWpBmqwyNn5Y+NX56QUYfCtsyhF3ayiboEoUmJk/A=="
    +"integrity": "sha512-<corrected_hash_value>"
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: Verifying the integrity hash is important for security, but the suggestion lacks the actual correct hash value for comparison.

    8
    Maintainability
    Assess the necessity of newly added dependencies for the updated package

    Verify that the new dependencies added under rimraf are necessary and do not introduce
    unnecessary bloat.

    POCUploadStream/ClientApp/package-lock.json [75]

    -"package-json-from-dist": "^1.0.0"
    +// "package-json-from-dist": "^1.0.0" // Verify necessity
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: Assessing the necessity of new dependencies is important for project health, and this suggestion addresses a valid concern, but it lacks specific context on the impact of these dependencies.

    7
    Check for compatibility of the new version with existing dependencies

    Ensure that the version constraint for rimraf is compatible with other dependencies in the
    project to avoid potential conflicts.

    POCUploadStream/ClientApp/package.json [14]

    -"rimraf": "^6.0.1"
    +"rimraf": "^6.0.1" // Ensure compatibility with other dependencies
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

    Why: Checking for compatibility is important for maintainability, but the suggestion does not provide specific guidance on how to verify compatibility.

    6
    Best practice
    Evaluate the necessity of the resolved field for the updated package

    Consider removing the resolved field if the package is being installed from a registry, as
    it may not be necessary.

    POCUploadStream/ClientApp/package-lock.json [71]

    -"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/rimraf/-/rimraf-6.0.1.tgz",
    +// "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/rimraf/-/rimraf-6.0.1.tgz",
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5

    Why: While it is a good practice to evaluate the necessity of the resolved field, it is not critical, and the suggestion does not provide a clear rationale for its removal.

    5

    Copy link

    github-actions bot commented Aug 1, 2024

    Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

    Scan results:

    3:20AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
    3:20AM INF 229 commits scanned.
    3:20AM INF scan completed in 909ms
    3:20AM INF no leaks found
    
    

    Copy link

    New dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

    Package New capabilities Transitives Size Publisher
    npm/[email protected] None 0 4.47 kB iansu

    View full report↗︎

    Copy link

    sonarcloud bot commented Aug 1, 2024

    @guibranco guibranco merged commit eadf8e5 into main Aug 1, 2024
    16 of 17 checks passed
    @guibranco guibranco deleted the snyk-upgrade-c669e1818e4c4d2b0d2463a37a328f15 branch August 1, 2024 03:21
    Copy link

    @coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Actionable comments posted: 0

    Review details

    Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
    Review profile: CHILL

    Commits

    Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0c4d3ed and cb0ab5e.

    Files ignored due to path filters (1)
    • POCUploadStream/ClientApp/package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
    Files selected for processing (1)
    • POCUploadStream/ClientApp/package.json (1 hunks)
    Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
    • POCUploadStream/ClientApp/package.json

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants