-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update README.md #3
Conversation
Review changes with SemanticDiff. |
My review is in progress 📖 - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes! |
Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:
Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:
|
👋 Hi there!Everything looks good!
|
### Feedback:
- Updated title in README.md ✅
- Added useful links section 🔗 |
WalkthroughThe repository has shifted its focus from being a general .NET Proof of Concept (PoC) template to specifically implementing PoC using EventStoreDb with .NET. The README.md file was updated to reflect this new direction and now includes a link to a Medium article detailing CRUD operations using EventStoreDb in .NET. Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Please double-check what I found in the pull request:Issue Counts Table
Summary of Proposed Changes
Identified IssuesNo issues were identified in the proposed changes. General ReviewThe proposed changes are straightforward and improve the specificity of the README file by focusing on EventStoreDb with .NET. The addition of a useful link is beneficial for users looking for more information on CRUD operations with EventStoreDb in .NET. The removal of the template-specific instructions is appropriate given the new focus of the repository. Overall, the changes enhance the clarity and usefulness of the README file. Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Feedback from Senior Dev Bot
# PoC EventStoreDb with .NET | ||
|
||
A template repository for .NET PoC (Proof of Concept) | ||
🔬 Proof of Concept of EventStoreDb with .NET | ||
|
||
--- | ||
|
||
- Create a new repository using this one as a template (click the green button at the top right of this page). | ||
- Edit [README.md](README.md) file to align with your PoC. | ||
- Change the solution and projects to suit your investigation/test/concept. | ||
## Useful links | ||
|
||
- https://medium.com/@abhinandkr56/crud-operations-using-eventstoredb-in-net-b851f65bd028 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
CODE REVIEW
The following suggestions can help improve clarity and add instructional detail:
- Add Purpose Section: Explain why EventStoreDb is being used.
- More Useful Links: Add links to official docs or tutorials.
# PoC EventStoreDb with .NET
🔬 Proof of Concept of EventStoreDb with .NET
---
## Purpose
This PoC demonstrates how to integrate EventStoreDb with a .NET application.
## Useful links
- [CRUD with EventStoreDb](https://medium.com/@abhinandkr56/crud-operations-using-eventstoredb-in-net-b851f65bd028)
- [EventStoreDb Official Docs](https://eventstore.com/docs/)
These additions improve the documentation context and provide more resources for the reader.
I have reviewed your code and did not find any issues! Please note that I can make mistakes, and you should still encourage your team to review your code as well. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
9-9
: Avoid using bare URLs.Markdown linting guidelines suggest avoiding bare URLs. Use a descriptive link text instead.
- https://medium.com/@abhinandkr56/crud-operations-using-eventstoredb-in-net-b851f65bd028 + [CRUD operations using EventStoreDb in .NET](https://medium.com/@abhinandkr56/crud-operations-using-eventstoredb-in-net-b851f65bd028)Tools
Markdownlint
9-9: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- README.md (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Markdownlint
README.md
9-9: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
Additional comments not posted (3)
README.md (3)
1-1
: Title update looks good.The title now accurately reflects the new focus on EventStoreDb with .NET.
3-3
: Description update looks good.The description now accurately reflects the new focus on EventStoreDb with .NET.
7-7
: Useful links section addition looks good.Adding a section for useful links is a helpful addition to the documentation.
Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked! Scan results:
|
Summary by CodeRabbit