Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump FluentAssertions from 6.12.0 to 6.12.1 #29

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 16, 2024

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Sep 16, 2024

Bumps FluentAssertions from 6.12.0 to 6.12.1.

Release notes

Sourced from FluentAssertions's releases.

6.12.1

What's Changed

Improvements

  • Improve BeEmpty() and BeNullOrEmpty() performance for IEnumerable<T>, by materializing only the first item - #2530

Fixes

  • Fixed formatting error when checking nullable DateTimeOffset with BeWithin(...).Before(...) - #2312
  • BeEquivalentTo will now find and can map subject properties that are implemented through an explicitly-implemented interface - #2152
  • Fixed that the because and becauseArgs were not passed down the equivalency tree - #2318
  • BeEquivalentTo can again compare a non-generic IDictionary with a generic one - #2358
  • Fixed that the FormattingOptions were not respected in inner AssertionScope - #2329
  • Capitalize true and false in failure messages and make them formattable to a custom BooleanFormatter - #2390, #2393
  • Improved the failure message for NotBeOfType when wrapped in an AssertionScope and the subject is null - #2399
  • Improved the failure message for BeWritable/BeReadable when wrapped in an AssertionScope and the subject is read-only/write-only - #2399
  • Improved the failure message for ThrowExactly[Async] when wrapped in an AssertionScope and no exception is thrown - #2398
  • Improved the failure message for [Not]HaveExplicitProperty when wrapped in an AssertionScope and not implementing the interface - #2403
  • Improved the failure message for [Not]HaveExplicitMethod when wrapped in an AssertionScope and not implementing the interface - #2403
  • Changed BeEquivalentTo to exclude private protected members from the comparison - #2417
  • Fixed using BeEquivalentTo on an empty ArraySegment - #2445, #2511
  • BeEquivalentTo with a custom comparer can now handle null values - #2489
  • Ensured that nested calls to AssertionScope(context) create a chained context - #2607
  • One overload of the AssertionScope constructor would not create an actual scope associated with the thread - #2607
  • Fixed ThrowWithinAsync not respecting OperationCanceledException - #2614
  • Fixed using BeEquivalentTo with an IEqualityComparer targeting nullable types - #2648

Full Changelog: fluentassertions/fluentassertions@6.12.0...6.12.1

Commits
  • a8e7f17 Update qodana
  • d58e0b5 Turn off RoslynAnalyzers in Qodana WF (#2504)
  • 2181217 Remove unused usings
  • 2c3a012 Make implicit usage more explicit
  • 1d5d64f Do not use UsingLineBreaks for [Not]BeSameAs
  • c30fc7a Fixed BeEquivalentTo when using a custom comparer targeting nullable types ...
  • f9b770b Make ThrowWithinAsync respect canceled tasks (#2614)
  • f204cf3 Simplify deferred allocation with local function
  • a3644b0 Only allocate Lazy<> and lambda when necessary
  • f3b4564 Ensured that nested assertion scopes produce a nested context (#2607)
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

Dependabot will merge this PR once CI passes on it, as requested by @guibranco.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Bumps [FluentAssertions](https://github.com/fluentassertions/fluentassertions) from 6.12.0 to 6.12.1.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/fluentassertions/fluentassertions/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/fluentassertions/fluentassertions/blob/develop/AcceptApiChanges.ps1)
- [Commits](fluentassertions/fluentassertions@6.12.0...6.12.1)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: FluentAssertions
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Sep 16, 2024

The following labels could not be found: nuget, .NET, packages, dependencies.

Copy link

korbit-ai bot commented Sep 16, 2024

By default, I don't review pull requests opened by bots. If you would like me to review this pull request anyway, you can request a review via the /korbit-review command in a comment.

Copy link

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

Copy link

gooroo-dev bot commented Sep 16, 2024

Please double check the following review of the pull request:

Issues counts

🐞Mistake 🤪Typo 🚨Security 🚀Performance 💪Best Practices 📖Readability ❓Others
0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Changes in the diff

  • 🛠️ No changes in the code.

Identified Issues

ID Type Details Severity Confidence

Since there are no changes in the code, there are no issues to address or tests to generate.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev
I'd love to hear your thoughts! React or reply.

Copy link

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

  1. Tests/POCEventStoreDb.Tests/POCEventStoreDb.Tests.csproj - Updating the FluentAssertions package to version 6.12.1 might introduce compatibility issues or breaking changes with the existing codebase that was designed and tested with version 6.12.0.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

  1. Tests/POCEventStoreDb.Tests/POCEventStoreDb.Tests.csproj - Before updating the FluentAssertions package to version 6.12.1, it's recommended to check the release notes or documentation for any breaking changes or migration steps required to update the version smoothly.

Copy link

pr-code-reviewer bot commented Sep 16, 2024

👋 Hi there!

Everything looks good!


Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo.
Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at [email protected].

Copy link

Hi there! 👋 Thanks for opening a PR. It looks like you've already reached the 5 review limit on our Basic Plan for the week. If you still want a review, feel free to upgrade your subscription in the Web App and then reopen the PR

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 16, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@guibranco guibranco enabled auto-merge (squash) September 16, 2024 02:17
@gstraccini gstraccini bot added the ☑️ auto-merge Auto-merge enabled by gstraccini-bot label Sep 16, 2024
Copy link

deepsource-io bot commented Sep 16, 2024

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 0076ced..7311953. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource Test coverage LogoTest coverage⚠️ Artifact not reportedTimed out: Artifact was never reportedView Check ↗
DeepSource Secrets LogoSecrets✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource C# LogoC#✅ SuccessView Check ↗

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

Copy link

instapr bot commented Sep 16, 2024

Feedback

The update from FluentAssertions 6.12.0 to 6.12.1 looks good. No further changes needed.

Copy link
Member

@guibranco guibranco left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Automatically approved by gstraccini[bot]

@gstraccini gstraccini bot added the 🤖 bot Issue/Pull request created by bot label Sep 16, 2024
@guibranco
Copy link
Member

@dependabot squash and merge

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Sep 16, 2024

Copy link

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

2:17AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
2:17AM INF 21 commits scanned.
2:17AM INF scan completed in 64.5ms
2:17AM INF no leaks found

Copy link
Contributor Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Sep 16, 2024

One of your CI runs failed on this pull request, so Dependabot won't merge it.

Dependabot will still automatically merge this pull request if you amend it and your tests pass.

@guibranco guibranco merged commit b579b16 into main Sep 16, 2024
13 of 16 checks passed
@guibranco guibranco deleted the dependabot/nuget/FluentAssertions-6.12.1 branch September 16, 2024 02:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
☑️ auto-merge Auto-merge enabled by gstraccini-bot 🤖 bot Issue/Pull request created by bot size/XS
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant