Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix sonar cloud report #30

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 18, 2024
Merged

Fix sonar cloud report #30

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 18, 2024

Conversation

guibranco
Copy link
Member

@guibranco guibranco commented Jul 18, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated build and analysis workflow to include project build and test commands.

Copy link

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

Copy link

korbit-ai bot commented Jul 18, 2024

My review is in progress 📖 - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

Copy link

pr-code-reviewer bot commented Jul 18, 2024

👋 Hi there!

Everything looks good!


Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo.
Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at [email protected].

Copy link

instapr bot commented Jul 18, 2024

Feedback

  • The changes in the .github/workflows/sonar-cloud.yml file seem appropriate.
  • It's good to see the addition of dotnet build and dotnet test commands.

Overall, the PR looks good.

Copy link

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

  1. sonar-cloud.yml:
    • In the GitHub workflow file, the commands dotnet build and dotnet test are added directly in the Build and analyze job without checking for the success of dotnet build before running dotnet test. This can lead to running tests on a potentially failing build, resulting in inaccurate test results.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

  1. sonar-cloud.yml:
    • Consider adding a conditional check after dotnet build to ensure the build is successful before proceeding with dotnet test. This can be achieved by checking the exit code of dotnet build before running dotnet test.
    • It's a good practice to separate the build and test steps in the workflow to ensure clear visibility and maintainability of the process. Consider splitting these into separate steps or jobs for better readability and maintainability.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 18, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The recent update to the .github/workflows/sonar-cloud.yml file focuses on enhancing the build and analysis job for a project. It involves adding commands to build and test the project using dotnet build and dotnet test, and includes setting up environment variables for GitHub and SonarCloud tokens.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/workflows/sonar-cloud.yml Added dotnet build and dotnet test commands; set up environment variables for GitHub and SonarCloud tokens.

Poem

In the realm of code so bright,
Builds and tests now take flight.
With tokens set and dotnet's might,
Sonar works through day and night.
Hopping smoothly, bugs in sight,
Our project's future, shining light. 🐰✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@guibranco guibranco enabled auto-merge (squash) July 18, 2024 00:29
@gstraccini gstraccini bot added the ☑️ auto-merge Automatic merging of pull requests (gstraccini-bot) label Jul 18, 2024
Copy link

@senior-dev-bot senior-dev-bot bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Feedback from Senior Dev Bot

Comment on lines 47 to 57

- name: Build and analyze
env:
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} # Needed to get PR information, if any
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
SONAR_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.SONAR_TOKEN }}
shell: powershell
run: |
.\.sonar\scanner\dotnet-sonarscanner begin /k:"${{ github.repository_owner }}_${{ github.event.repository.name }}" /o:"${{ vars.SONAR_ORG }}" /d:sonar.login="${{ secrets.SONAR_TOKEN }}" /d:sonar.host.url="https://sonarcloud.io"

dotnet build
dotnet test
.\.sonar\scanner\dotnet-sonarscanner end /d:sonar.login="${{ secrets.SONAR_TOKEN }}"

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CODE REVIEW

  1. Code Segregation: Segregate the build and test commands for readability and potential future modular changes.

  2. Error Handling: Add error handling to ensure the build step halts on failure.

  3. Comments: Maintain descriptive comments for clarity.

- name: Build and analyze
  env:
    GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
    SONAR_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.SONAR_TOKEN }}
  shell: powershell
  run: |
    # Start SonarQube scan
    .\.sonar\scanner\dotnet-sonarscanner begin /k:"${{ github.repository_owner }}_${{ github.event.repository.name }}" /o:"${{ vars.SONAR_ORG }}" /d:sonar.login="${{ secrets.SONAR_TOKEN }}" /d:sonar.host.url="https://sonarcloud.io"
    
    # Build project
    dotnet build || exit 1
    
    # Run tests
    dotnet test || exit 1
    
    # End SonarQube scan
    .\.sonar\scanner\dotnet-sonarscanner end /d:sonar.login="${{ secrets.SONAR_TOKEN }}"

Copy link

gooroo-dev bot commented Jul 18, 2024

Please double-check what I found in the pull request:

Issue Counts

🐞Mistake 🤪Typo 🚨Security 🚀Performance 💪Best Practices 📖Readability ❓Others
0 0 0 0 0 1 0

Summary of Proposed Changes

  • ✅ Removed unnecessary comment about the GITHUB_TOKEN.
  • ➕ Added dotnet build and dotnet test commands to the workflow.

Identified Issues

ID Type Details Severity Confidence
1 📖Readability The comment # Needed to get PR information, if any was removed, which might reduce clarity. 🟡Low 🟡Low

Issue 1: Comment Removal

Explanation

The comment # Needed to get PR information, if any was removed from the GITHUB_TOKEN line. While this does not affect functionality, it might reduce clarity for future maintainers who may not immediately understand the purpose of the GITHUB_TOKEN.

Suggested Code

         env:
           GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}  # Needed to get PR information, if any
           SONAR_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.SONAR_TOKEN }}

Explanation of Fix

Re-adding the comment will help maintain clarity and understanding of the purpose of the GITHUB_TOKEN for future developers.

General Review

The proposed changes are generally good and improve the functionality of the workflow by adding build and test steps. However, the removal of the comment might slightly reduce readability. Re-adding the comment would maintain clarity without affecting functionality.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev
Add a reaction or reply to share your feedback!

@github-actions github-actions bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 18, 2024
Copy link

codeclimate bot commented Jul 18, 2024

Code Climate has analyzed commit 0f6f9d4 and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

View more on Code Climate.

Copy link

korbit-ai bot commented Jul 18, 2024

I have reviewed your code and did not find any issues!


Please note that I can make mistakes, and you should still encourage your team to review your code as well.

Copy link

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

12:30AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
12:30AM INF 29 commits scanned.
12:30AM INF scan completed in 66.6ms
12:30AM INF no leaks found

@guibranco guibranco merged commit 180c42f into main Jul 18, 2024
16 of 18 checks passed
@guibranco guibranco deleted the feature/fix-sonar branch July 18, 2024 00:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
☑️ auto-merge Automatic merging of pull requests (gstraccini-bot) korbit-code-analysis size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant