-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement save for scenebridge #949
Conversation
95628c3
to
f0b525f
Compare
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Clang-Tidy
found issue(s) with the introduced code (1/5)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Clang-Tidy
found issue(s) with the introduced code (2/5)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Clang-Tidy
found issue(s) with the introduced code (3/5)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Clang-Tidy
found issue(s) with the introduced code (4/5)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Clang-Tidy
found issue(s) with the introduced code (5/5)
Codecov ReportAttention:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #949 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 35.38% 35.36% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 287 289 +2
Lines 23872 24022 +150
==========================================
+ Hits 8447 8496 +49
- Misses 15425 15526 +101 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
No Clang-Tidy warnings found so I assume my comments were addressed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for working on this! Overall LGTM, will approve, but make sure to resolve the comments I wrote before merging. Also: regarding the blueprint realation serialization change (to use '@'), make sure that docs match the new format. IIRC i wrote some stuff explaining the previous format, not sure where (perhaps in the bridge docs or sample)
Description
Include a summary of the changes here.
Checklist