Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[TASK] add respond(d) daemon #157

Closed
wants to merge 28 commits into from
Closed

[TASK] add respond(d) daemon #157

wants to merge 28 commits into from

Conversation

genofire
Copy link
Member

@genofire genofire commented Jan 24, 2019

fix #156

a proof of concept


@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jan 24, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #157 into master will decrease coverage by 13.27%.
The diff coverage is 1.76%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #157       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   75.05%   61.78%   -13.28%     
===========================================
  Files          52       62       +10     
  Lines        1772     2151      +379     
===========================================
- Hits         1330     1329        -1     
- Misses        404      784      +380     
  Partials       38       38
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
respond/daemon/statistics.go 0% <0%> (ø)
respond/daemon/batman.go 0% <0%> (ø)
cmd/serve.go 9.09% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
respond/daemon/main.go 0% <0%> (ø)
respond/daemon/config.go 0% <0%> (ø)
respond/daemon/handler.go 0% <0%> (ø)
respond/daemon/nodeinfo.go 0% <0%> (ø)
cmd/import.go 12% <0%> (-1.05%) ⬇️
respond/daemon/neighbours.go 0% <0%> (ø)
respond/daemon/data.go 0% <0%> (ø)
... and 14 more

@belzebub40k
Copy link
Contributor

@genofire What do you think about an option to specify from which interface(s) to read the IP addresses? Currently only the IPs from the interface on which the request was received is listed for servers with interfaces in multiple meshes. It would be nice to have either the loopback addresses or all mesh IPs listed.

@genofire genofire force-pushed the respondd branch 4 times, most recently from d016969 to 0e32336 Compare May 21, 2019 08:05
@genofire genofire closed this Feb 17, 2021
@genofire genofire deleted the branch master February 17, 2021 21:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Should yanic be also a respondd daemon
4 participants