The sanic framework tests have recently started failing a single test:
`test_redirect_with_params`, which has a weird error relating to string
formatting: `"sanic%20test" != "sanic test"`.
This test's assertion was subtly changed in the most recent release of
sanic by altering the string formatting of the asserted string value,
and this only started failing once the new version of sanic (23.3.0) was
released, so we can consider skipping this test for now until we upgrade
to match the latest version of sanic.

- [x] Change(s) are motivated and described in the PR description.
- [x] Testing strategy is described if automated tests are not included
in the PR.
- [x] Risk is outlined (performance impact, potential for breakage,
maintainability, etc).
- [x] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation).
- [x] [Library release note
guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html)
are followed. If no release note is required, add label
`changelog/no-changelog`.
- [x] Documentation is included (in-code, generated user docs, [public
corp docs](https://github.com/DataDog/documentation/)).
- [x] Backport labels are set (if
[applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting))

- [ ] Title is accurate.
- [ ] No unnecessary changes are introduced.
- [ ] Description motivates each change.
- [ ] Avoids breaking
[API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces)
changes unless absolutely necessary.
- [ ] Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risk(s).
- [ ] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation).
- [ ] Release note makes sense to a user of the library.
- [ ] Reviewer has explicitly acknowledged and discussed the performance
implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment.
- [ ] Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the
[release branch maintenance
policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)

(cherry picked from commit d06ec2f)