-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature/3672 autocheck none value #2362
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some changes required to the form declarations, and one JS code change.
The form declarations need to be fixed before this can go to test, so will hold off on passing it through until the next round
"contexts": { | ||
"admin": { | ||
"widgets": [ | ||
"autocheck", # ~~^-> Autocheck:FormWidget~~ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The context
fields overwrite the base fields, so in this case this would remove the trim_whitespace
and multiple_field
widgets, and replace them with just the autocheck
field. Instead, this should list all 3 required widgets.
"contexts": { | ||
"admin": { | ||
"widgets": [ | ||
"autocheck", # ~~^-> Autocheck:FormWidget~~ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same comment as above
"contexts": { | ||
"admin": { | ||
"widgets": [ | ||
"autocheck", # ~~^-> Autocheck:FormWidget~~ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same comment as above
"contexts": { | ||
"admin": { | ||
"widgets": [ | ||
"autocheck", # ~~^-> Autocheck:FormWidget~~ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same comment as above
portality/static/js/autochecks.js
Outdated
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
function drawIconMessage(autocheck, message, icon, style) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Functions shouldn't be declared in the global namespace, they should be attached to the doaj
global. So if you want this here it should be
doaj.autocheckers.drawIconMessage = function(autocheck, message, icon, style) { ... }
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me, ready for test
[3672] Autocheck for when entry boxes have the value "None"
Please don't delete any sections when completing this PR template; instead enter N/A for checkboxes or sections which are not applicable, unless otherwise stated below
See #
Describe the scope/purpose of the PR here in as much detail as you like
Categorisation
This PR...
Basic PR Checklist
Instructions for developers:
Instructions for reviewers:
Code Style
No deprecated methods are used
No magic strings/numbers - all strings are in
constants
ormessages
filesES queries are wrapped in a Query object rather than inlined in the code
Where possible our common library functions have been used (e.g. dates manipulated via
dates
)Cleaned up commented out code, etc
Urls are constructed with
url_for
not hard-codedTesting
Unit tests have been added/modified
Functional tests have been added/modified
Code has been run manually in development, and functional tests followed locally
Have CSS/style changes been implemented? If they are of a global scope (e.g. on base HTML elements) have the downstream impacts of the change in other areas of the system been considered?
Documentation
FeatureMap annotations have been added
Documentation updates - if needed - have been identified and prepared for inclusion into main documentation (e.g. added and highlighted/commented as appropriate to this PR)
Core model documentation has been added to if needed: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lun2S9vwGbyfy3WjIjgXBm05D-3wWDZ4bp8xiIYfImM/edit
Events and consumers documentation has been added if needed: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1oIeG5vg-blm2MZCE-7YhwulUlSz6TOUeY8jAftdP9JE/edit
The docs for this branch have been generated and pushed to the doc site (see docs/README.md for details)
Release Readiness
If needed, migration has been created and tested locally
Release sheet has been created, and completed as far as is possible https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Bqx23J1MwXzjrmAygbqlU3YHxN1Wf7zkkRv14eTVLZQ/edit
There has been a recent merge up from
develop
(or other base branch). List the dates of the merges up from develop belowTesting
List the Functional Tests that must be run to confirm this feature
The functional test here: https://doaj.github.io/doaj-docs/feature/3672_autocheck_none_value/testbook/index.html#autocheck/autocheck
This test requires you to run the autocheck testdrive which will set up the records as needed.
Deployment
What deployment considerations are there? (delete any sections you don't need)
Configuration changes
What configuration changes are included in this PR, and do we need to set specific values for production
Scripts
What scripts need to be run from the PR (e.g. if this is a report generating feature), and when (once, regularly, etc).
Migrations
What migrations need to be run to deploy this
Monitoring
What additional monitoring is required of the application as a result of this feature
New Infrastructure
What new infrastructure does this PR require (e.g. new services that need to run on the back-end).
Continuous Integration
What CI changes are required for this