Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

reducing cyences severity #589

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

reducing cyences severity #589

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion cyences_app_for_splunk/default/savedsearches.conf
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1963,7 +1963,7 @@ search = `cs_o365` _index_earliest=-61m@m _index_latest=-1m@m (sourcetype="o365:
| stats latest(Status) as Status latest(_time) as _time by Service host \
| search Status IN ("ExtendedRecovery","InformationUnavailable","Investigating*","RestoringService","ServiceDegradation","ServiceInterruption") \
| `cs_human_readable_time_format(_time, LastUpdatedTime)` \
| eval cyences_severity = "medium" \
| eval cyences_severity = "low" \
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have a concern from a security standspoint, is it really a low severity alert??

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can discuss it in our Soc meeting today before merging

| table LastUpdatedTime cyences_severity host Service Status \
| sort host Status | `cs_o365_service_not_operational_filter`
action.cyences_notable_event_action = 1
Expand Down