Bugfix: Incorrect Decimal Precision in StatisticalResult.print_summary (No Style) #1635
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
print_summary
method in thelifelines.statistics.StatisticalResult
class was not correctly handling thedecimals
argument when no explicitstyle
was provided. This led to the output table displaying the default precision of 2 decimals, even if a different value was specified.self.decimals
so that the value is shared properly by all the methods of the class.For example, the issue was reproduced using the provided example with the results of the
logrank_test
without explicit 'style' argument, resulting in a incorrect table with a precision of 2 decimals (the default) instead of 10:This happened only without explicit 'style' was provided, as the following worked well:
With the correction, the call
results.print_summary(decimals=4)
now results in the expected table:Other fitters and regression tables (Cox PH, Weibull, etc.) were not affected by this bug and continue to function as expected.