Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create node.js.yml #43

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Create node.js.yml #43

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

csikb
Copy link
Contributor

@csikb csikb commented Apr 22, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Implemented a continuous integration workflow to enhance code quality and reliability by automatically building and testing the codebase across multiple Node.js versions.

Signed-off-by: Bence Csik <[email protected]>
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 22, 2024

Walkthrough

A Node.js CI workflow has been added to the project, automating tasks like dependency management, building, and testing across multiple Node.js versions to enhance code integrity and compatibility.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/workflows/node.js.yml Sets up a Node.js CI workflow for automating dependency installation, caching, source code building, and testing across different Node.js versions.

Poem

🐇💻🌟
In the garden of code, where the snippets do bloom,
A new workflow dances, dispelling the gloom.
With each push and pull, it gracefully tests,
Ensuring our code meets its very best.
Oh, how the bytes hop, in CI's sweet embrace!
🚀🌿🐰


Recent Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e204729 and 29bbae4.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/node.js.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
.github/workflows/node.js.yml (4)

6-10: Trigger setup for main branch looks good.

This setup ensures that the workflow runs for all pushes and pull requests to the main branch, which is a common practice for CI workflows.


13-15: Job setup on Ubuntu latest is appropriate.

Using the latest Ubuntu runner is standard and provides good compatibility for most Node.js projects.


22-28: Setup of Node.js and caching configurations are correctly implemented.

Using actions/checkout and actions/setup-node with npm caching is standard practice and enhances the efficiency of the workflow.


29-30: Commands for dependency installation and test execution are correctly set.

Using npm ci for clean dependency installation and npm run test:ci for running tests are best practices in CI environments.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Signed-off-by: Bence Csik <[email protected]>
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

.github/workflows/node.js.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 22, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (242e270) to head (29bbae4).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main       #43   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           11        11           
  Lines          140       140           
  Branches        10        10           
=========================================
  Hits           140       140           
Flag Coverage Δ
unit 100.00% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@csikb
Copy link
Contributor Author

csikb commented Apr 22, 2024

Slower than Circle CI :(

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Apr 29, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Out of diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/node.js.yml (2)

1-2: Ensure the workflow description is clear and concise.

Consider refining the workflow description to explicitly state its purpose and benefits in a concise manner.


17-20: Consider testing against multiple Node.js versions.

Testing against multiple versions of Node.js, such as the latest, LTS, and a minimum supported version, can help ensure broader compatibility of the application.

@csikb csikb closed this May 2, 2024
@csikb csikb deleted the add-action branch May 2, 2024 16:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant