Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 3040 - parameterized namespace include - #3172

Merged

Conversation

niekraaijmakers
Copy link
Contributor

add possibility to exclude children from certain resource types

Fixing bug 3040

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 29, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #3172 (40011ab) into master (87a1216) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 78.26%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #3172      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     55.18%   55.20%   +0.01%     
- Complexity     5410     5419       +9     
============================================
  Files           711      711              
  Lines         29011    29030      +19     
  Branches       3752     3759       +7     
============================================
+ Hits          16010    16026      +16     
  Misses        11496    11496              
- Partials       1505     1508       +3     
Files Changed Coverage Δ
...ude/NamespacedTransformedResourceProviderImpl.java 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...nents/impl/include/IncludeDecoratorFilterImpl.java 71.73% <75.00%> (+3.16%) ⬆️
...mpl/include/NamespaceDecoratedValueMapBuilder.java 82.05% <88.88%> (+0.62%) ⬆️
...ponents/impl/include/NamespaceResourceWrapper.java 62.50% <100.00%> (ø)

@davidjgonzalez davidjgonzalez merged commit 4be29a1 into Adobe-Consulting-Services:master Aug 30, 2023
21 checks passed
YegorKozlov pushed a commit to YegorKozlov/acs-aem-commons that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2023
…es#3172)

* Bug 3040 - parameterized namespace include - add possibility to exclude children from certain resource types

---------

Co-authored-by: Niek Raaijmakers <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants