Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add sort command for tutorial 2 #2

Conversation

nananakx-x
Copy link

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 28, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (379dbee) 75.26% compared to head (8a4817b) 75.33%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master       #2      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     75.26%   75.33%   +0.07%     
- Complexity      419      424       +5     
============================================
  Files            71       72       +1     
  Lines          1338     1350      +12     
  Branches        126      126              
============================================
+ Hits           1007     1017      +10     
- Misses          301      302       +1     
- Partials         30       31       +1     
Files Coverage Δ
...java/seedu/address/logic/commands/SortCommand.java 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/main/java/seedu/address/model/AddressBook.java 84.37% <100.00%> (+1.04%) ⬆️
src/main/java/seedu/address/model/Model.java 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...rc/main/java/seedu/address/model/ModelManager.java 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...a/seedu/address/model/person/UniquePersonList.java 87.50% <100.00%> (+0.54%) ⬆️
.../seedu/address/logic/parser/AddressBookParser.java 90.47% <0.00%> (-9.53%) ⬇️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@nananakx-x nananakx-x closed this Sep 28, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant