-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Extract cubewrite
fill value modifications
#114
Open
blimlim
wants to merge
11
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
99/fill-values
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
72c183f
Extract cubewrite fill value modifications into separate function
blimlim 239a69e
Add custom fill value type check
blimlim f3fbd44
More explicit custom_fill_val check to allow 0 values
blimlim 0a57c66
Split fill value modifications into two steps
blimlim f800a43
Add return value to fix_fill_value
blimlim 7a812be
clean up
blimlim a538df0
Merge branch '99/fill-values-split-functions-test' into 99/fill-values
blimlim 9fd827b
Restructure and add custom_fill_value argument
blimlim 014bd37
Typos
blimlim e0048d4
Clarifying comment on type conversion
blimlim e3b98f3
clean up comments
blimlim File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My linter (flake8) complains here, suggesting
do not compare types, for exact checks use "is" / "is not", for instance checks use "isinstance()"
I've had a play around, however neither
is
orisinstance
work as desired when usingcube.data.dtype
in the comparison. Would be keen to gather any suggestions!There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is
will fail if the instances are not the same object.The second aspect is
numpy
using internal types in place of Python's built in primitives:That affects comparison operations (more on that in another comment).