Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename PlayerAgeProperties #1256

Open
AngheloAlf opened this issue May 29, 2023 · 8 comments
Open

Rename PlayerAgeProperties #1256

AngheloAlf opened this issue May 29, 2023 · 8 comments

Comments

@AngheloAlf
Copy link
Collaborator

The PlayerAgeProperties name is a holdover from the OoT decomp project because it is used for the two ages in OoT, but it is used for each transformation (and Kafei) in MM.

It would be nice if we could rename it to something that better reflects what it represents in MM. We should also consider if we want to keep the name synced with OoT.

Currently there are two possible options:

  • PlayerTransformationProperties
  • PlayerFormProperties
@mzxrules
Copy link
Contributor

mzxrules commented May 29, 2023

I would prefer a name that both could use, and this Sakurai video makes me want to have it named PlayerParameters, or drop Age from the OoT name

@lachlanPaul
Copy link

Would this be as simple as a refactor of the name or would it require a bit more work?

@AngheloAlf
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Actually doing it would be just a refactor, the tricky part is actually deciding on a new name

@lachlanPaul
Copy link

I suppose some people would prefer it stay the same just for authenticity or something? I can't think of an exact reason but some people might prefer it stay the same for consistency or something like that, to keep engine differences minimal from OOT I suppose. I think it'd make sense to be changed but also I'm not sure if it should stay the same.

@lachlanPaul
Copy link

I think PlayerFormProperties would be a good name if it did get refactored though

@lachlanPaul
Copy link

What do you think about this @AngheloAlf? Would it be better off staying the same to keep consistent, or should it be changed? I'm still a bit mixed on it and want a definitive opinion from someone.

@AngheloAlf
Copy link
Collaborator Author

It is tempting, yes. The main issue is discussing with the rest of the contributors to decide and agree in a new name.
Since you seem to be really interested in this I suggest you to join our discord server where we have most of our discussions https://discord.zelda64.dev/

@lachlanPaul
Copy link

Yeah, I'm still learning C and programming in general, but I'd love to contribute in some way :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants