Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Work on smaller input size #31

Open
chiuhc opened this issue Dec 7, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Work on smaller input size #31

chiuhc opened this issue Dec 7, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@chiuhc
Copy link

chiuhc commented Dec 7, 2018

Hi,
I was trying to work on resized input images close to 256X256 rather than 50% of Raw camera image size (1020X680). Turns out the confidence matrix become quite small and hits the performance.

I was thinking about modifying squeeze_net structure. Your squeeze_net has 1 extra 2X2 max_pooling than squeeze_net v1.1. Did you retrain the squeeze_net model you provided on imagenet data?
I wonder if I can remove it such that the final confidence matrix resolution is larger?
Do I have to retrain squeezenet backbone on image_net data if I do so?
Any other suggestion? would you recommend doing upconvolution in FC1?

Many thanks,

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant