You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
I was trying to work on resized input images close to 256X256 rather than 50% of Raw camera image size (1020X680). Turns out the confidence matrix become quite small and hits the performance.
I was thinking about modifying squeeze_net structure. Your squeeze_net has 1 extra 2X2 max_pooling than squeeze_net v1.1. Did you retrain the squeeze_net model you provided on imagenet data?
I wonder if I can remove it such that the final confidence matrix resolution is larger?
Do I have to retrain squeezenet backbone on image_net data if I do so?
Any other suggestion? would you recommend doing upconvolution in FC1?
Many thanks,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
I was trying to work on resized input images close to 256X256 rather than 50% of Raw camera image size (1020X680). Turns out the confidence matrix become quite small and hits the performance.
I was thinking about modifying squeeze_net structure. Your squeeze_net has 1 extra 2X2 max_pooling than squeeze_net v1.1. Did you retrain the squeeze_net model you provided on imagenet data?
I wonder if I can remove it such that the final confidence matrix resolution is larger?
Do I have to retrain squeezenet backbone on image_net data if I do so?
Any other suggestion? would you recommend doing upconvolution in FC1?
Many thanks,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: